HII Mission Technologies Corp. awarded $4.2M for Live Virtual Constructive Technology Support by GSA

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $4,213,013 ($4.2M)

Contractor: HII Mission Technologies Corp

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2020-09-08

End Date: 2021-05-09

Contract Duration: 243 days

Daily Burn Rate: $17.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: IT

Official Description: LIVE VIRTUAL CONSTRUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: DAYTON, GREENE County, OHIO, 45433

State: Ohio Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $4.2 million to HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP for work described as: LIVE VIRTUAL CONSTRUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract value represents a moderate investment in specialized simulation and training technology. 2. Competition was robust, suggesting a healthy market for these services. 3. Performance timeline of 243 days indicates a focused, short-term project. 4. The contract type (Time and Materials) allows for flexibility but requires careful monitoring of labor costs. 5. This award falls within the broader category of management consulting services, highlighting the administrative support aspect of advanced technology deployment.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $4.2 million for 243 days of support is within a reasonable range for specialized technology services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for LVC technology support would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The Time and Materials pricing structure, while flexible, necessitates close oversight to ensure costs remain aligned with project scope and market labor rates. Without specific performance metrics or detailed cost breakdowns, a definitive value assessment is challenging, but the award amount itself does not appear excessive for the described services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The presence of a single award suggests that HII Mission Technologies Corp. was selected as the most advantageous offer. The level of competition is a positive sign for price discovery and ensures that the government is likely receiving competitive pricing. Further details on the number of bids received would offer a clearer picture of the competitive landscape.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by driving down prices through market forces and encouraging a wider pool of qualified contractors to participate, leading to potentially better value.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely military or defense personnel who will utilize the Live Virtual Constructive (LVC) training environment. The services delivered are crucial for enhancing training realism and effectiveness in complex operational scenarios. The geographic impact is centered in Ohio, where the services are being performed or supported. Workforce implications include the potential for skilled technical personnel to be engaged in the development, implementation, and support of this advanced training technology.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The contract falls within the Information Technology and Professional Services sector, specifically focusing on simulation and training technologies. The market for LVC solutions is growing, driven by the need for realistic and cost-effective training environments in defense and other sectors. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other government contracts for simulation, virtual training, and related IT support services. The $4.2 million award is a moderate investment within this specialized niche.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses arising from a set-aside requirement. The prime contractor, HII Mission Technologies Corp., may still engage small businesses as subcontractors, but this is not mandated by the contract's structure. The impact on the small business ecosystem is neutral in terms of direct set-aside benefits.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the contract administration team within the General Services Administration (GSA). Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Accountability measures are inherent in the contract terms, including performance expectations and payment schedules. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

it, professional-services, general-services-administration, hii-mission-technologies-corp, full-and-open-competition, time-and-materials, delivery-order, simulation-and-training, defense, ohio, administrative-management, consulting-services

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $4.2 million to HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. LIVE VIRTUAL CONSTRUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $4.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-09-08. End: 2021-05-09.

What is the track record of HII Mission Technologies Corp. in delivering similar Live Virtual Constructive (LVC) technology support services?

HII Mission Technologies Corp. has a significant presence in the defense and aerospace sectors, often involved in complex technology integration, simulation, and training solutions. While specific details on their LVC support for this particular contract are not provided, their broader portfolio suggests experience with advanced simulation environments. Analyzing past performance on similar government contracts, including customer satisfaction ratings and any documented performance issues, would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their capabilities and reliability in delivering LVC technology support. Their history often includes work on large-scale simulation and training programs, indicating a capacity to handle such requirements.

How does the $4.2 million award compare to the average cost of similar LVC technology support contracts?

Benchmarking the $4.2 million award against similar LVC technology support contracts requires access to a broader dataset of comparable awards. Factors such as contract duration, scope of services, specific technologies involved, and the level of expertise required significantly influence pricing. Given the 243-day duration, this award represents a moderate investment. Contracts for more extensive, multi-year LVC system development or sustainment could range from tens to hundreds of millions of dollars. Conversely, smaller, more focused support tasks might be awarded for less. Without more granular data on comparable contracts, it's difficult to definitively state if this award is high or low, but it appears reasonable for a defined period of specialized support.

What are the primary risks associated with the Time and Materials (T&M) contract type for this LVC technology support?

The primary risk associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract for LVC technology support is the potential for cost overruns. T&M contracts allow the contractor to bill for direct labor hours at specified hourly rates and for the actual cost of materials. If the scope of work is not clearly defined, or if project management is weak, labor hours can escalate beyond initial estimates, driving up the total cost. For the government, this necessitates robust oversight to ensure that the labor is necessary, efficient, and that the rates are fair market value. Uncontrolled scope creep is a significant risk factor that can inflate costs unpredictably under a T&M arrangement.

How effective is the GSA's Federal Acquisition Service in managing and overseeing contracts for specialized IT services like LVC technology support?

The General Services Administration's Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) is a major provider of acquisition solutions for the federal government, including IT services. FAS manages a vast number of contracts and has established processes for procurement and oversight. For specialized IT services like LVC technology support, FAS leverages various contract vehicles and expertise to ensure compliance and value. Effectiveness can vary depending on the specific contracting team, the complexity of the requirement, and the level of government oversight applied. While FAS generally provides a structured framework, the ultimate effectiveness relies on diligent contract administration, clear performance metrics, and proactive risk management by the assigned contracting officers and technical representatives.

What is the historical spending trend for Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services (NAICS 541611) by the General Services Administration?

The General Services Administration (GSA) consistently awards significant amounts for Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services (NAICS 541611), reflecting its role in providing shared services and support across the government. Historical spending data indicates a substantial and often increasing trend in this category as agencies increasingly rely on external expertise for management, operational efficiency, and strategic planning. GSA's own operational needs and its role in facilitating government-wide procurements contribute to this high spending volume. Analyzing specific year-over-year data for GSA's spending under 541611 would reveal the magnitude and growth trajectory of these investments.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc

Address: 8350 BROAD ST STE 1400, MC LEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $4,213,013

Exercised Options: $4,213,013

Current Obligation: $4,213,013

Actual Outlays: $-66,754

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS00F064CA

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline

Start Date: 2020-09-08

Current End Date: 2021-05-09

Potential End Date: 2021-05-09 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-02-03

More Contracts from HII Mission Technologies Corp

View all HII Mission Technologies Corp federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending