GSA awards $19.9M for engineering services to Modern Technology Solutions, Inc. under BPA Call

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $19,932,156 ($19.9M)

Contractor: Modern Technology Solutions, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2020-01-10

End Date: 2025-07-14

Contract Duration: 2,012 days

Daily Burn Rate: $9.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: Other

Official Description: AFLCMC XZZ PROGRAM OFFICE SUPPORT TASK ORDER

Place of Performance

Location: DAYTON, GREENE County, OHIO, 45433

State: Ohio Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $19.9 million to MODERN TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC. for work described as: AFLCMC XZZ PROGRAM OFFICE SUPPORT TASK ORDER Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in engineering support services. 2. The award was made under a full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The duration of the contract, spanning over five years, indicates a long-term need for these services. 4. The use of a BPA Call suggests a streamlined procurement process for a pre-established agreement. 5. The contract is for labor hours, implying a focus on personnel expertise rather than fixed deliverables. 6. The geographic location of the contractor in Ohio may have implications for local economic impact.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $19.9 million over approximately five years for engineering services appears reasonable given the scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar engineering support contracts awarded by GSA or other agencies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The use of labor hours necessitates careful monitoring of productivity and efficiency to ensure fair pricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation generally suggests a robust competitive environment, which is favorable for price discovery and achieving competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process is beneficial for taxpayers as it maximizes the pool of potential offerors, thereby increasing the likelihood of receiving competitive bids and potentially lowering the overall cost to the government.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely federal agencies requiring specialized engineering expertise, particularly within the AFLCMC XZZ Program Office. The services delivered will support critical program management and technical functions. The geographic impact is primarily centered in Ohio, where the contractor is located, potentially creating or sustaining local jobs. Workforce implications include the employment of skilled engineers and technical personnel by Modern Technology Solutions, Inc.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if task orders are not clearly defined.
Reliance on labor hours can lead to cost overruns if not managed diligently.
Ensuring consistent quality of engineering services across all task orders.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing.
Long-term contract duration indicates a stable need and potential for ongoing support.
Contractor's location in Ohio may align with specific regional support needs.

Sector Analysis

Engineering services represent a significant segment of the federal contracting market, encompassing a wide range of specialized technical support. This contract, valued at approximately $19.9 million, falls within the typical range for complex engineering support tasks. The market is characterized by a mix of large defense contractors and specialized engineering firms, with competition often driven by technical expertise and past performance.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). While Modern Technology Solutions, Inc. may be a small business itself, the contract was not formally set aside for small businesses. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses, which could be a missed opportunity to engage the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program office at the awarding agency (General Services Administration, Federal Acquisition Service). Accountability measures are embedded in the contract terms, performance work statements, and invoicing procedures. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific task order details might be less public.

Related Government Programs

Engineering Services
Program Management Support
Federal Acquisition Service Contracts
BPA Call Awards

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to labor-hour contract type.
Need for robust oversight to ensure quality and efficiency of services.
Scope definition critical to prevent uncontrolled expansion.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $19.9 million to MODERN TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC.. AFLCMC XZZ PROGRAM OFFICE SUPPORT TASK ORDER

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MODERN TECHNOLOGY SOLUTIONS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $19.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-01-10. End: 2025-07-14.

What is the historical spending pattern for engineering services under similar BPA Calls awarded by GSA?

Analyzing historical spending for similar engineering services procured via BPA Calls by GSA requires access to detailed contract databases. Generally, BPA Calls are used to procure services under pre-negotiated agreements, allowing for quicker acquisition. Spending patterns can vary significantly based on agency needs, specific engineering disciplines required, and the overall economic climate. However, agencies often leverage BPA Calls to achieve cost savings through pre-competed rates and streamlined ordering processes. For engineering services, spending can fluctuate based on defense spending, infrastructure projects, and research and development initiatives. Without specific data on comparable BPA Calls, it's difficult to provide precise historical benchmarks, but the trend is towards efficient procurement of specialized services.

How does the awarded amount compare to the estimated value or ceiling of the underlying BPA?

The provided data does not include the ceiling value of the underlying Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) from which this task order was called. Therefore, a direct comparison between the awarded amount ($19.9 million) and the BPA's ceiling cannot be made. However, the fact that this task order reached $19.9 million suggests that either the BPA had a substantial ceiling, or this represents a significant portion of the BPA's total potential value. Task orders under BPAs are typically capped by the BPA's overall ceiling. If this task order represents a large percentage of the BPA's potential, it indicates a substantial requirement for the engineering services outlined.

What specific engineering disciplines or services are covered under this contract?

The contract is categorized under NAICS code 541330, which denotes 'Engineering Services.' This is a broad category that can encompass a wide array of specialized engineering disciplines. Given the context of AFLCMC (Air Force Life Cycle Management Center), these services likely include areas such as aerospace engineering, systems engineering, software engineering, electrical engineering, mechanical engineering, and potentially specialized fields like cybersecurity engineering or test and evaluation engineering. The specific task orders issued under this contract would detail the precise nature of the engineering support required, but the general classification points to technical and analytical engineering expertise.

What is the track record of Modern Technology Solutions, Inc. in performing similar government contracts?

Modern Technology Solutions, Inc. (MTSI) has a documented history of performing government contracts, particularly within the defense and aerospace sectors. Publicly available contract databases often show MTSI as a recipient of numerous awards for engineering, technical, and program management support services. Their performance record typically includes work with various Department of Defense agencies, including the Air Force. While specific performance metrics for this particular contract are not yet available due to its start date, MTSI is generally recognized as an experienced contractor in this domain. A deeper dive into past performance reviews and contract close-out data would provide a more granular assessment.

Are there any identified risks associated with the contractor or the nature of the services provided?

Risks associated with this contract are generally related to the nature of engineering services procured on a labor-hour basis. Potential risks include cost overruns if labor hours are not efficiently utilized or if the scope of work expands beyond initial estimates without proper change control. There's also a risk related to ensuring the consistent quality and expertise of the personnel assigned to the contract. For the contractor, Modern Technology Solutions, Inc., risks might involve maintaining a competitive edge in a dynamic market, retaining skilled personnel, and adapting to evolving technological requirements. However, the use of full and open competition and the established nature of GSA's contracting vehicles generally mitigate some of the higher-level acquisition risks.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: ID05190001004

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4725B EISENHOWER AVE, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 22304

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $24,096,910

Exercised Options: $21,334,094

Current Obligation: $19,932,156

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QFLA20A0005

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline