USSOUTHCOM awards $77.4M IT services contract to ManTech for enterprise cyber and data-informed IT support

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $77,416,388 ($77.4M)

Contractor: Mantech Advanced Systems International, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2025-08-08

End Date: 2026-04-24

Contract Duration: 259 days

Daily Burn Rate: $298.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: IT

Official Description: THE UNITED STATES SOUTHERN COMMAND (USSOUTHCOM) CYBER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) ENTERPRISE SERVICES 2 (SCITES 2) TASK ORDER PROVIDES COMPREHENSIVE ENTERPRISE-LEVEL CYBER AND DATA-INFORMED IT SERVICES FOR USSOUTHCOM AND MISSION PARTNERS.

Place of Performance

Location: DORAL, MIAMI-DADE County, FLORIDA, 33172

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $77.4 million to MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. for work described as: THE UNITED STATES SOUTHERN COMMAND (USSOUTHCOM) CYBER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) ENTERPRISE SERVICES 2 (SCITES 2) TASK ORDER PROVIDES COMPREHENSIVE ENTERPRISE-LEVEL CYBER AND DATA-INFORMED IT SERVICES FOR USSOUTHCOM AND MISSION PARTNERS. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on comprehensive enterprise-level cyber and data-informed IT services. 2. Awarded via full and open competition, indicating broad market engagement. 3. Task order structure suggests a specific project within a larger IT framework. 4. Performance period spans approximately 20 months, from August 2025 to April 2026. 5. Contract type is Cost Plus Award Fee, incentivizing performance and cost control. 6. The IT services sector is critical for modern military operations and intelligence. 7. This contract supports USSOUTHCOM's mission partners, extending its reach. 8. No small business set-aside was utilized for this specific award.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure allows for performance incentives, which can drive value if managed effectively. Benchmarking the specific IT services against similar GSA schedules or other agency contracts would provide a clearer picture of value for money. The total award amount of $77.4 million for a 20-month period for enterprise-level cyber and IT services appears within a reasonable range for complex government IT support, though detailed cost breakdowns are needed for a precise assessment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This task order was awarded under a full and open competition, suggesting that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The presence of 7 bidders indicates a healthy level of competition for this IT services requirement. A competitive process like this generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government compared to sole-source or limited competition awards.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are being used efficiently by leveraging market forces to obtain competitive pricing and innovative solutions for essential IT services.

Public Impact

USSOUTHCOM and its mission partners will benefit from enhanced cyber and IT capabilities. Services delivered include comprehensive enterprise-level cyber defense and data-informed IT solutions. The geographic impact is primarily within USSOUTHCOM's operational area, supporting its global mission. Workforce implications may include the need for specialized IT and cybersecurity personnel, potentially sourced by the contractor.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Cost Plus Award Fee contracts require diligent oversight to ensure costs are reasonable and award fees are justified.
The scope of 'enterprise-level' services can be broad, necessitating clear performance metrics and deliverables to avoid scope creep.
Cybersecurity services are inherently high-risk; continuous monitoring and robust security protocols are essential.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive marketplace.
The CPAF structure incentivizes contractor performance and potentially cost savings.
Focus on cyber and data-informed IT aligns with critical national security needs.
Task order structure allows for focused execution of specific IT requirements.

Sector Analysis

The IT services sector for the federal government is vast and highly competitive, encompassing a wide range of capabilities from basic infrastructure support to advanced cybersecurity and cloud solutions. This contract falls within the 'Computer Systems Design Services' NAICS code (541512), a segment that supports the design, development, and integration of complex IT systems. Spending in this area is consistently high across defense and civilian agencies, reflecting the increasing reliance on technology for mission execution. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within GSA IT Schedule contracts or other large enterprise IT service vehicles.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting goals explicitly mentioned in the provided data. This suggests that the primary award went to a large business. While large contracts can sometimes include subcontracting opportunities for small businesses, the absence of a set-aside indicates that the primary focus was on obtaining the best overall solution through open competition, rather than specifically targeting small business participation for the prime contract.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the contracting officer and the contracting officer's representative (COR) within the General Services Administration (GSA) Federal Acquisition Service, in coordination with USSOUTHCOM. The Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure necessitates robust performance monitoring and evaluation to ensure that award fees are earned based on objective performance metrics. Transparency is typically maintained through contract reporting mechanisms and agency procurement databases. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any issues of fraud, waste, or abuse arise.

Related Government Programs

USSOUTHCOM IT Enterprise Services
DoD Cyber Command Services
GSA IT Schedule Contracts
Enterprise IT Modernization Programs
Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns in CPAF contracts if not closely managed.
Cybersecurity risks inherent in providing IT services to a military command.
Dependence on contractor performance for critical IT and cyber functions.
Scope creep risk in broad 'enterprise-level' service definitions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $77.4 million to MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.. THE UNITED STATES SOUTHERN COMMAND (USSOUTHCOM) CYBER INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) ENTERPRISE SERVICES 2 (SCITES 2) TASK ORDER PROVIDES COMPREHENSIVE ENTERPRISE-LEVEL CYBER AND DATA-INFORMED IT SERVICES FOR USSOUTHCOM AND MISSION PARTNERS.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $77.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-08-08. End: 2026-04-24.

What is ManTech Advanced Systems International, Inc.'s track record with similar large-scale IT and cybersecurity contracts for the Department of Defense?

ManTech Advanced Systems International, Inc. has a significant history of performing large-scale IT and cybersecurity contracts, particularly for the Department of Defense and intelligence agencies. They are a well-established government contractor known for providing a wide array of services including software development, systems engineering, cybersecurity, and enterprise IT support. Their portfolio often includes complex programs requiring high levels of security clearance and technical expertise. Reviewing their past performance on contracts with agencies like the Air Force, Navy, and Army, as well as other combatant commands, would reveal their capabilities in managing similar scope, complexity, and security requirements. Specific examples of past successful task orders or prime contracts in enterprise IT modernization, network security, and data analytics would be relevant indicators of their ability to execute the SCITES 2 task order effectively.

How does the Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure compare to other contract types for similar IT services, and what are the implications for value?

The Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract type is often used for complex services where performance is difficult to define precisely upfront or where innovation is encouraged. Unlike Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) contracts, CPAF reimburses the contractor for allowable costs and includes a base fee plus an award fee determined by the government based on performance against defined criteria. This structure incentivizes the contractor to exceed minimum performance standards to earn higher award fees, potentially leading to better service quality and innovation. However, it also requires robust government oversight to ensure costs are reasonable and that award fees are justified. Compared to Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) or FFP, CPAF offers a balance between flexibility and performance incentives, but it can lead to higher overall costs if not managed diligently, as the government pays for both costs and performance-based incentives.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) likely to be used to evaluate ManTech's performance under this CPAF contract?

For the SCITES 2 task order, key performance indicators (KPIs) under a CPAF structure would likely focus on critical aspects of enterprise IT and cybersecurity service delivery. These could include metrics related to system uptime and availability, network performance, response times for IT support tickets, cybersecurity incident detection and response times, successful patch management rates, and the effectiveness of data security measures. KPIs might also address project management effectiveness, such as adherence to schedules and budgets for specific task order objectives, and the successful implementation of new IT solutions or upgrades. Furthermore, customer satisfaction surveys from USSOUTHCOM and its mission partners would likely be incorporated to gauge the quality and impact of the services provided. The specific KPIs would be detailed in the contract's Performance Work Statement (PWS).

What is the historical spending trend for enterprise IT services at USSOUTHCOM or similar combatant commands?

Historical spending on enterprise IT services at USSOUTHCOM and similar combatant commands has generally shown a consistent upward trend, driven by the increasing digitization of military operations, the need for advanced cybersecurity capabilities, and the expansion of data analytics for intelligence and mission planning. Combatant commands require robust, secure, and reliable IT infrastructure to support global operations, command and control, and communication. Spending often encompasses network infrastructure, cybersecurity solutions, cloud services, software development, and end-user support. While specific figures for USSOUTHCOM's IT spending prior to this award would require detailed analysis of historical contract databases, it's common for such commands to allocate tens to hundreds of millions of dollars annually towards IT services to maintain operational readiness and technological superiority in their respective areas of responsibility.

How does the 'Computer Systems Design Services' NAICS code (541512) typically encompass the scope of 'enterprise-level cyber and data-informed IT services' mentioned in the award?

The 'Computer Systems Design Services' NAICS code (541512) is a broad category that well encompasses the scope of 'enterprise-level cyber and data-informed IT services' described for the SCITES 2 task order. This NAICS code covers establishments primarily engaged in planning and designing computer systems that integrate hardware, software, and communication technologies. This includes activities such as systems analysis, systems integration design, implementation of software, and IT consulting. 'Enterprise-level' implies a comprehensive, organization-wide approach, which aligns with designing and integrating systems across an entire command like USSOUTHCOM. 'Cyber' services fall under the security aspects of system design and integration, while 'data-informed IT services' relate to the design of systems that can effectively collect, process, analyze, and leverage data for decision-making, all of which are core components addressed by this classification.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › IT AND TELECOM - APLLICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QFCA25R0008

Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Mantech International Corporation

Address: 2251 CORPORATE PARK DRIVE, HERNDON, VA, 20171

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $909,904,525

Exercised Options: $100,450,000

Current Obligation: $77,416,388

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 51

Total Subaward Amount: $167,107,725

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QTCK18D0031

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline