GSA awards $24.9M engineering services contract to CACI NSS, LLC for Florida-based support

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $24,926,189 ($24.9M)

Contractor: CACI NSS, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2024-09-30

End Date: 2026-03-31

Contract Duration: 547 days

Daily Burn Rate: $45.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: Other

Official Description: THE PURPOSE OF THIS ACTION IS TO AWARD THE SCOPES BASE CONTRACT.

Place of Performance

Location: DORAL, MIAMI-DADE County, FLORIDA, 33172

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $24.9 million to CACI NSS, LLC for work described as: THE PURPOSE OF THIS ACTION IS TO AWARD THE SCOPES BASE CONTRACT. Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract type is Cost Plus Award Fee, which incentivizes performance but requires careful oversight. 3. The duration of 547 days indicates a medium-term engagement for engineering services. 4. The contract is for engineering services, a critical sector for government operations. 5. The awardee, CACI NSS, LLC, is a significant player in the federal contracting space. 6. The contract is not set aside for small businesses, implying larger prime contractors are expected. 7. The contract is a delivery order against a base contract, suggesting it's part of a larger framework.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract's value of $24.9 million over approximately 18 months requires benchmarking against similar engineering service contracts. The Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure means the final cost can vary based on performance, making direct price comparisons challenging without knowing the award fee achieved. However, the base contract value provides a starting point for assessing value for money. Further analysis would involve comparing the proposed labor rates and overhead to industry standards for similar engineering services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The presence of 4 bidders suggests a moderate level of competition for this specific delivery order. While full and open competition is generally preferred for maximizing price discovery and achieving best value, the actual level of competition can be influenced by the specific technical requirements and the number of capable contractors in the market.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from the potential for competitive pricing and the assurance that the government sought the best available solution through an open process. This approach aims to prevent inflated costs and ensure that public funds are used efficiently.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely federal agencies requiring specialized engineering services, potentially within the General Services Administration's Federal Acquisition Service. The contract will deliver engineering services, which could encompass a wide range of technical support, design, analysis, or project management. The geographic impact is specified as Florida (ST: FL, SN: FLORIDA), indicating services will be performed or managed from this location. Workforce implications include the potential for employment opportunities for engineers and technical staff within CACI NSS, LLC and its potential subcontractors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract type requires diligent oversight to ensure award fees are justified and not merely awarded to meet targets.
The lack of specific details on the engineering services to be performed makes it difficult to assess the true value and potential risks.
The contract is a delivery order, which could indicate a need for rapid or flexible support, potentially increasing the risk of scope creep if not managed tightly.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust process for selecting the contractor.
The contractor, CACI NSS, LLC, is an established entity with experience in federal contracting.
The contract has defined start and end dates, providing a clear timeframe for service delivery and performance evaluation.

Sector Analysis

Engineering services represent a significant segment of the federal contracting market, encompassing a broad range of technical expertise. This contract falls under the Engineering Services (NAICS 541330) category. Spending in this sector is driven by the government's need for technical support across various agencies, from infrastructure development and defense systems to IT modernization and scientific research. Benchmarking this contract's value would involve comparing it to other federal contracts for similar engineering disciplines and scopes of work, considering factors like duration, complexity, and geographic location.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses (SB: false). The prime contractor, CACI NSS, LLC, is a large business. This implies that subcontracting opportunities may exist for small businesses, but there is no explicit requirement for a small business set-aside. The absence of a set-aside suggests the scope of work may require capabilities typically found in larger firms or that the competition was structured to attract a wider range of bidders, including large businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the contracting officer and the contract administration office within the General Services Administration (GSA). The Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure necessitates performance monitoring to ensure award fees are earned based on objective criteria. Transparency will depend on GSA's reporting practices and the availability of contract details. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

General Services Administration (GSA) - Federal Acquisition Service
Engineering Services Contracts
Cost Plus Award Fee Contracts
Defense Engineering Services
Infrastructure Engineering Support

Risk Flags

Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) requires diligent performance monitoring.
Potential for scope creep if requirements are not clearly defined.
Need to benchmark award fee criteria against industry standards.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $24.9 million to CACI NSS, LLC. THE PURPOSE OF THIS ACTION IS TO AWARD THE SCOPES BASE CONTRACT.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CACI NSS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $24.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-09-30. End: 2026-03-31.

What is CACI NSS, LLC's track record with the General Services Administration and similar engineering service contracts?

CACI NSS, LLC is a significant federal contractor with a substantial history of performing various services for government agencies, including the GSA. Analyzing their past performance on similar engineering service contracts, particularly those with a Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure, would provide insight into their ability to manage costs, meet performance targets, and deliver quality engineering solutions. A review of past performance evaluations and any contract disputes or awards would be crucial. Their extensive experience suggests a capacity to handle complex engineering requirements, but specific performance metrics on comparable GSA contracts would offer a more precise assessment of their reliability and value proposition in this context.

How does the $24.9 million value compare to similar engineering service contracts awarded by GSA or other agencies?

The $24.9 million value for approximately 18 months of engineering services needs to be benchmarked against comparable contracts. Factors such as the specific engineering disciplines required (e.g., civil, mechanical, electrical, software), the complexity of the tasks, the level of security clearance needed, and the geographic location of service delivery all influence pricing. Contracts for similar services awarded by GSA or other agencies like the Department of Defense or Department of Transportation over the past few years would serve as benchmarks. Without detailed task order information, a precise comparison is difficult, but the value appears to be within a typical range for medium-term, specialized engineering support engagements for a large federal agency.

What are the primary risks associated with a Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract for engineering services?

The primary risks with a CPAF contract for engineering services revolve around cost control and performance measurement. While CPAF incentivizes performance through award fees, there's a risk that the government may overpay if award fee criteria are not sufficiently stringent or if contractor performance is not rigorously monitored. Conversely, contractors might focus on achieving award fee targets at the expense of other critical, but less measurable, aspects of performance. Effective oversight, clear and objective performance metrics, and robust communication between the government and contractor are essential to mitigate these risks and ensure the government receives good value for its investment in engineering services.

What is the typical duration and value range for engineering service contracts of this nature?

Engineering service contracts awarded by federal agencies can vary widely in duration and value depending on the scope and complexity. Contracts can range from short-term, project-specific engagements lasting a few months to long-term, indefinite-delivery indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) vehicles spanning several years. Values can range from tens of thousands to hundreds of millions of dollars. A contract valued at $24.9 million with a duration of 547 days (approximately 18 months) falls into the medium-term, medium-value category for specialized engineering support. This duration suggests a significant project or a sustained need for technical expertise rather than a quick, ad-hoc requirement.

How does the 'full and open competition' designation impact potential cost savings for taxpayers?

The 'full and open competition' designation is intended to maximize cost savings for taxpayers by ensuring that the government solicits offers from all responsible sources. This broad competition increases the likelihood of receiving multiple proposals, which drives down prices as contractors vie for the award. It also allows the government to compare a wider range of technical solutions and pricing structures, enabling selection of the best value. While competition is a key driver of savings, the actual cost-effectiveness also depends on the clarity of the requirements, the effectiveness of the evaluation process, and the negotiation of fair and reasonable prices. In this case, with 4 bidders, a competitive environment was established.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QFCA24R0035

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: CACI International Inc

Address: 12021 SUNSET HILLS RD, RESTON, VA, 20190

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $225,926,545

Exercised Options: $103,669,746

Current Obligation: $24,926,189

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 12

Total Subaward Amount: $19,361,863

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS00Q14OADU121

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline