GSA awards $123.8M contract to Life Science Logistics for managed services of medical supplies and equipment

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $123,818,689 ($123.8M)

Contractor: Life Science Logistics LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2021-11-05

End Date: 2026-11-04

Contract Duration: 1,825 days

Daily Burn Rate: $67.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: EO14042 MANAGED SERVICES SUPPORT FOR GOVERNMENT-OWNED PHARMACEUTICAL MEDICAL SUPPLIES AND MEDICAL EQUIPMENT SITE M

Place of Performance

Location: IRVING, DALLAS County, TEXAS, 75038

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $123.8 million to LIFE SCIENCE LOGISTICS LLC for work described as: EO14042 MANAGED SERVICES SUPPORT FOR GOVERNMENT-OWNED PHARMACEUTICAL MEDICAL SUPPLIES AND MEDICAL EQUIPMENT SITE M Key points: 1. Contract value of $123.8M over five years suggests significant demand for specialized logistics. 2. The firm fixed-price contract type indicates predictable costs for the government. 3. Awarded under full and open competition, implying a robust bidding process. 4. The contract duration of 1825 days (5 years) allows for long-term planning and stability. 5. Focus on government-owned pharmaceutical, medical supplies, and equipment highlights critical infrastructure support. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 493120 points to specialized warehousing and storage needs.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $123.8M over five years for managed services of medical supplies and equipment appears reasonable given the specialized nature of handling pharmaceuticals and medical devices. Benchmarking against similar government contracts for logistics and warehousing of sensitive materials would provide a more precise value assessment. The firm fixed-price structure helps control costs, but the overall value depends on the efficiency and effectiveness of the services provided by Life Science Logistics.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The number of bidders is not specified, but this method generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service offerings for the government. The agency likely sought to maximize value by allowing a wide range of qualified contractors to participate.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it typically drives down prices and encourages innovation, ensuring the government receives the best possible value for its investment in critical medical supply chain management.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are federal agencies relying on a consistent and secure supply of pharmaceuticals, medical supplies, and equipment. Services delivered include managed logistics, warehousing, and potentially distribution of critical medical items. The contract is based in Texas (TX), suggesting a significant operational footprint in that region. This contract supports the healthcare sector's supply chain, ensuring readiness and operational capability for government medical facilities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader logistics and warehousing sector, specifically focusing on the specialized needs of the healthcare and pharmaceutical industries. The market for medical logistics is substantial, driven by the need for temperature-controlled storage, strict regulatory compliance, and efficient distribution of sensitive products. Government spending in this area is critical for maintaining national health security and operational readiness.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Life Science Logistics LLC is likely a large business. There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses, which could be a missed opportunity to engage the small business ecosystem. Further investigation into subcontracting requirements would be necessary to assess the impact on small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Federal Acquisition Service. Mechanisms for oversight would include performance reviews, contract compliance checks, and potentially audits. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

healthcare, logistics, warehousing, medical-supplies, pharmaceuticals, managed-services, general-services-administration, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, texas, large-business

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $123.8 million to LIFE SCIENCE LOGISTICS LLC. EO14042 MANAGED SERVICES SUPPORT FOR GOVERNMENT-OWNED PHARMACEUTICAL MEDICAL SUPPLIES AND MEDICAL EQUIPMENT SITE M

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LIFE SCIENCE LOGISTICS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $123.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-11-05. End: 2026-11-04.

What is the track record of Life Science Logistics LLC in managing federal contracts, particularly those involving pharmaceuticals and medical equipment?

Life Science Logistics LLC has a history of performing government contracts, including those related to medical supplies and logistics. While specific details on past performance for this exact type of managed service are not provided in the summary data, their ability to secure a significant contract like this from the GSA suggests they have demonstrated capability and met the requirements of federal procurement. A deeper dive into their contract history, including past performance evaluations and any reported issues on previous federal awards, would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their track record. This includes examining their experience with similar regulatory environments and the scale of operations required for managing government-owned medical assets.

How does the awarded value of $123.8 million compare to similar managed services contracts for medical supplies and equipment in the federal government?

The $123.8 million contract value over five years equates to approximately $24.76 million per year. This figure needs to be benchmarked against comparable federal contracts for managed logistics, warehousing, and distribution of pharmaceuticals and medical equipment. Factors such as the volume of goods managed, the complexity of inventory, temperature control requirements, and the geographic scope of services will influence cost. Without specific data on similar contracts, it's challenging to definitively state if this represents a high, low, or average value. However, given the specialized nature and regulatory demands of medical supplies, this annual figure appears within a plausible range for comprehensive managed services.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Key risks include potential disruptions to the medical supply chain due to contractor performance issues, data security breaches related to sensitive inventory information, and failure to maintain strict regulatory compliance (e.g., temperature control for pharmaceuticals). Mitigation strategies likely involve robust performance monitoring by the GSA, clearly defined service level agreements (SLAs), contingency planning by the contractor, and adherence to strict quality assurance protocols. The firm fixed-price nature also carries a risk of the contractor cutting corners to maintain profitability, which necessitates vigilant oversight to ensure service quality is not compromised. The contract's duration also presents a risk of vendor lock-in if not managed carefully.

How effective is the firm fixed-price (FFP) contract type in ensuring value for money for this specific service?

The Firm Fixed-Price (FFP) contract type is generally effective in ensuring value for money when the scope of work is well-defined and the risks of cost overruns are manageable. For managed services of medical supplies and equipment, FFP provides cost certainty for the government, as the contractor assumes the risk of cost increases. This incentivizes the contractor to operate efficiently. However, if the scope is not precisely defined or unforeseen challenges arise, the contractor might be disincentivized from performing additional necessary work, or conversely, may have sought a higher price upfront to buffer against unknown risks. Effective management and clear performance metrics are crucial to ensure the FFP structure truly delivers value without compromising service quality.

What are the historical spending patterns for similar managed logistics services within the General Services Administration or other relevant agencies?

Historical spending patterns for managed logistics services within the GSA and other agencies supporting medical supplies and equipment are substantial and have likely seen an increase due to heightened awareness of supply chain resilience. Agencies like the Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and Veterans Affairs frequently contract for warehousing, distribution, and inventory management of medical materiel. Spending can fluctuate based on national health emergencies, strategic stockpiling initiatives, and routine operational needs. Analyzing past GSA Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) spending or specific solicitations for similar services would reveal trends in contract values, durations, and the types of services procured, providing context for the current $123.8M award.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Transportation and WarehousingWarehousing and StorageRefrigerated Warehousing and Storage

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: 47QFCA21R0069

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Life Science Logistics, LLC

Address: 2600 REGENT BLVD, DFW AIRPORT, TX, 75261

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $198,892,241

Exercised Options: $127,818,189

Current Obligation: $123,818,689

Actual Outlays: $103,156,280

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2021-11-05

Current End Date: 2026-11-04

Potential End Date: 2031-11-04 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2025-10-28

More Contracts from Life Science Logistics LLC

View all Life Science Logistics LLC federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending