GSA awards $9.2M custodial and O&M services contract to Pundir Group, Inc. for 3 years

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $9,213,719 ($9.2M)

Contractor: Pundir Group, Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2024-02-01

End Date: 2027-01-31

Contract Duration: 1,095 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: EXERCISE OPTION YEAR 1 - CUSTODIAL, GROUNDS, O&M, VTE, & TRASH SERVICES- BAKERSFIELD / COYLE

Place of Performance

Location: FRESNO, FRESNO County, CALIFORNIA, 93721

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $9.2 million to PUNDIR GROUP, INC for work described as: EXERCISE OPTION YEAR 1 - CUSTODIAL, GROUNDS, O&M, VTE, & TRASH SERVICES- BAKERSFIELD / COYLE Key points: 1. Contract awarded through a GSA BPA Call, indicating a pre-competed framework. 2. The contract covers custodial, grounds, operations & maintenance, and trash services. 3. Services are for facilities in Bakersfield and Coyle, California. 4. The contract has a firm-fixed-price structure, providing cost certainty. 5. Option Year 1 exercise suggests initial performance was satisfactory. 6. No small business set-aside was utilized for this award.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's value of $9.2 million over three years for custodial and O&M services appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar GSA contracts for facilities maintenance in California would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price nature helps control costs, but detailed performance metrics would be needed to fully evaluate efficiency.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a full and open competition via a GSA BPA Call. This implies that multiple vendors were likely considered or competed for the underlying BPA, and then this specific call was also competed. The use of a BPA generally signifies a competitive process at the BPA award stage, and subsequent calls are often streamlined but still competitive.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition, especially through a GSA schedule or BPA, generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for taxpayers compared to sole-source or limited competition awards.

Public Impact

Federal employees and visitors to GSA facilities in Bakersfield and Coyle, California, will benefit from maintained and clean environments. The contract ensures the operational readiness and upkeep of government buildings. Services include essential groundskeeping and waste management, contributing to facility functionality. The contract supports jobs within the custodial, maintenance, and operations sectors in the local California economy.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for price creep if contract scope expands beyond initial expectations.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical facility services could pose a risk if performance issues arise.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost predictability.
Award through a GSA BPA suggests a level of pre-qualification and competition.
Option year exercise indicates satisfactory performance in the initial period.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader facilities management and government contracting sector. The General Services Administration (GSA) is a major procurer of such services, utilizing various contract vehicles like Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs) to streamline procurement for common needs. Spending on custodial, O&M, and grounds services is a consistent requirement across federal agencies for maintaining government property.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside. While the BPA Call mechanism can sometimes include subcontracting opportunities for small businesses, the primary awardee is not a small business. Further review of the BPA's subcontracting plan would be necessary to determine the extent of small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) typically has robust oversight mechanisms for its contracts, including performance monitoring and quality assurance. As this is a BPA Call, oversight may be managed by the issuing GSA office. The firm-fixed-price nature provides some financial oversight. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases.

Related Government Programs

GSA Facilities Maintenance Contracts
Federal Building Operations and Maintenance
Custodial Services Contracts
Grounds Maintenance Contracts

Risk Flags

NAICS code mismatch: 541690 (Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services) does not align with the described services (custodial, O&M, grounds, trash).

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $9.2 million to PUNDIR GROUP, INC. EXERCISE OPTION YEAR 1 - CUSTODIAL, GROUNDS, O&M, VTE, & TRASH SERVICES- BAKERSFIELD / COYLE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PUNDIR GROUP, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $9.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-02-01. End: 2027-01-31.

What is the historical spending pattern for custodial and O&M services by the GSA in California?

Analyzing historical spending by the GSA for similar services in California requires access to detailed procurement data beyond this single contract. Generally, GSA spends billions annually on facilities management across the nation. Factors influencing spending include the number of federal buildings managed, their size and condition, geographic location (which impacts labor and material costs), and the specific services required. Contracts like this one, often awarded through BPAs or schedules, represent a portion of that overall expenditure. To understand the specific pattern for Bakersfield/Coyle, one would need to examine prior contracts for those facilities or similar ones in the region, looking at award amounts, durations, and contractor performance over time.

How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar custodial and O&M services in the Bakersfield/Coyle region?

A precise comparison requires detailed market research on prevailing wages, material costs, and typical service provider markups in the Bakersfield/Coyle area. However, GSA contracts, especially those awarded through competitive processes like BPA Calls, are generally expected to be at or below market rates due to volume purchasing power and established procurement procedures. The firm-fixed-price structure further aims to lock in costs. Without specific local benchmarks for comparable private sector contracts of similar scope and quality, it's difficult to definitively state if this price is high or low. However, the competitive nature of the award suggests a reasonable price was achieved.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to evaluate Pundir Group, Inc.'s performance under this contract?

The specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract are not detailed in the provided data. However, for custodial, grounds, and O&M services, typical KPIs often include response times for service requests, cleanliness standards (e.g., cleanliness scores based on inspections), preventative maintenance completion rates, waste removal efficiency, and adherence to safety protocols. The exercise of the Option Year 1 suggests that Pundir Group, Inc. met or exceeded the performance expectations set forth in the initial contract period, implying satisfactory performance against its defined KPIs.

What is Pundir Group, Inc.'s track record with the federal government, particularly with the GSA?

Pundir Group, Inc. has a history of federal contracting, as evidenced by this award and potentially others. To assess their track record thoroughly, one would need to examine their contract history in federal databases like SAM.gov or FPDS. This would reveal past performance ratings, any past performance issues or disputes, the types and values of contracts previously held, and their experience with similar services (custodial, O&M). A positive track record with the GSA, especially on similar service contracts, would increase confidence in their ability to perform this current contract successfully.

Are there any specific risks associated with the 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services' NAICS code for this type of facilities contract?

The NAICS code '541690 - Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services' appears to be a mismatch for a contract primarily focused on custodial, grounds, O&M, and trash services. Typically, such services would fall under different NAICS codes related to facilities support, building maintenance, or janitorial services (e.g., 561210 - Facilities Support Services, 561720 - Janitorial Services). This discrepancy raises a potential risk flag regarding the accuracy of the classification, which could impact reporting, analysis, and potentially the procurement process itself if it led to an inappropriate solicitation strategy. It's possible the 'consulting' aspect relates to a minor component or a broader BPA framework, but the core services described are operational.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 615 10TH ST, SACRAMENTO, CA, 95814

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $42,401,013

Exercised Options: $9,213,719

Current Obligation: $9,213,719

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PK0223A0004

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline