GSA awards $26.2M for Abernethy Federal Building modernization and mold remediation in Mississippi

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $26,247,917 ($26.2M)

Contractor: Brasfield & Gorrie LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2021-08-18

End Date: 2024-07-31

Contract Duration: 1,078 days

Daily Burn Rate: $24.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: DESIGN BUILD SERVICES FOR INFRASTRUCTURE MODERNIZATIONS AND MOLD REMEDIATION AT THE ABERNETHY FEDERAL BUILDING, ABERDEEN, MS

Place of Performance

Location: ABERDEEN, MONROE County, MISSISSIPPI, 39730

State: Mississippi Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $26.2 million to BRASFIELD & GORRIE LLC for work described as: DESIGN BUILD SERVICES FOR INFRASTRUCTURE MODERNIZATIONS AND MOLD REMEDIATION AT THE ABERNETHY FEDERAL BUILDING, ABERDEEN, MS Key points: 1. Contract value of $26.2 million for design-build services. 2. Full and open competition was utilized for this award. 3. The contract has a duration of 1078 days. 4. The project involves infrastructure modernization and mold remediation. 5. The award was made by the General Services Administration (GSA). 6. The contractor is Brasfield & Gorrie LLC. 7. The project is located in Aberdeen, Mississippi.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $26.2 million appears reasonable for a comprehensive design-build project involving infrastructure modernization and mold remediation for a federal building. Benchmarking against similar GSA projects for building construction and renovation would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure suggests that cost risks are largely borne by the contractor, which can be beneficial for the government if managed effectively.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. With 5 bids received, the competition level suggests a healthy market interest and provides the government with a basis for price discovery. The presence of multiple bidders generally leads to more competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are likely being used efficiently by fostering a competitive environment that drives down costs.

Public Impact

Federal employees and visitors to the Abernethy Federal Building will benefit from improved facilities and a healthier environment. The project delivers essential infrastructure modernization and critical mold remediation services. The geographic impact is focused on Aberdeen, Mississippi. The project will likely create or sustain jobs in the construction sector within Mississippi.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen complexities arise during modernization or remediation.
Ensuring timely completion within the 1078-day duration is crucial for operational continuity.
Quality control for both design and construction aspects needs rigorous oversight.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive pricing environment.
Experienced contractor, Brasfield & Gorrie LLC, likely brings significant expertise to the project.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, specifically for federal infrastructure modernization and remediation. The GSA is a major procurer of construction services for federal facilities. The market for federal building construction is substantial, with significant spending allocated annually for maintenance, repair, and new construction. This project aligns with the government's ongoing efforts to maintain and upgrade its real property assets.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting goals for small businesses. Further review of the contract details would be needed to ascertain any subcontracting requirements or their impact on the small business ecosystem. Without specific set-aside provisions, large businesses are the primary recipients of the prime contract.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) typically employs robust oversight mechanisms for construction projects, including regular site inspections, progress reviews, and quality assurance checks. The firm-fixed-price contract structure places a significant portion of the risk on the contractor, incentivizing them to manage costs and schedules effectively. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and public reporting, though specific project-level oversight details may vary.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Modernization Projects
Infrastructure Repair and Maintenance
Environmental Remediation Contracts
GSA Construction Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for unforeseen conditions during mold remediation.
Schedule adherence is critical for building occupancy.
Ensuring quality of both design and construction.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $26.2 million to BRASFIELD & GORRIE LLC. DESIGN BUILD SERVICES FOR INFRASTRUCTURE MODERNIZATIONS AND MOLD REMEDIATION AT THE ABERNETHY FEDERAL BUILDING, ABERDEEN, MS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BRASFIELD & GORRIE LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $26.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-08-18. End: 2024-07-31.

What is the track record of Brasfield & Gorrie LLC with the federal government, particularly on similar GSA projects?

Brasfield & Gorrie LLC is a large, well-established construction firm with a significant history of working on federal projects, including those managed by the General Services Administration. Their portfolio often includes complex infrastructure, healthcare, and institutional building projects. A detailed review of their past performance on federal contracts, including any past performance evaluations or disputes, would be necessary to fully assess their suitability and reliability for this specific project. Their experience with design-build delivery methods and federal building standards is likely extensive, given their market presence.

How does the awarded price compare to similar GSA infrastructure modernization and mold remediation projects?

Direct comparison of the $26.2 million award requires access to a database of similar GSA projects with detailed scope, size, and location. However, for a comprehensive design-build project involving both modernization and significant mold remediation at a federal facility, this value appears within a reasonable range. Factors such as the building's size, complexity of the infrastructure upgrades, extent of mold contamination, and local labor costs in Mississippi would influence the final price. Benchmarking against projects of similar scale and complexity would provide a more definitive assessment of value for money.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Key risks include potential cost overruns due to unforeseen conditions during mold remediation or infrastructure upgrades, schedule delays impacting building occupancy, and quality control issues. The firm-fixed-price contract mitigates cost overrun risk for the government by placing it on the contractor. Mitigation for schedule delays and quality issues relies on robust project management by both the contractor and GSA oversight, including detailed scheduling, regular progress monitoring, and stringent quality assurance protocols. The contractor's experience and bonding capacity also serve as risk mitigation factors.

What is the expected impact of this project on the operational effectiveness and safety of the Abernethy Federal Building?

The project is expected to significantly enhance the operational effectiveness and safety of the Abernethy Federal Building. Infrastructure modernization will likely improve the building's systems (e.g., HVAC, electrical, plumbing), leading to greater efficiency, reliability, and reduced maintenance costs. Critically, the mold remediation will address potential health hazards for occupants, improving indoor air quality and ensuring a safe working environment. These improvements are essential for maintaining the building's functionality and supporting the agencies housed within.

How has federal spending on building construction and renovation by the GSA trended in recent years, and how does this contract fit?

Federal spending on building construction and renovation by the GSA has historically been substantial, driven by the need to maintain and upgrade a vast portfolio of federal properties. Spending levels can fluctuate based on budget appropriations, infrastructure initiatives, and the condition of existing assets. This $26.2 million contract for modernization and remediation fits within the GSA's ongoing capital investment and asset management programs. It represents a specific investment in a particular facility, contributing to the broader goal of ensuring federal buildings are safe, efficient, and functional.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: EQ7PCA-21-0006

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3021 7TH AVE S, BIRMINGHAM, AL, 35233

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $26,247,917

Exercised Options: $26,247,917

Current Obligation: $26,247,917

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PH0821D0004

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline