GSA awards $226K for El Paso lab renovation, highlighting construction sector activity

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $226,360 ($226.4K)

Contractor: King & George, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2025-09-18

End Date: 2026-04-23

Contract Duration: 217 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: THE RENOVATION AND MODERNIZATION OF THE TASK FORCE LAB AND TASK FORCE SPACE IN EL PASO, TX.

Place of Performance

Location: EL PASO, EL PASO County, TEXAS, 79901

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $226,359.8 to KING & GEORGE, LLC for work described as: THE RENOVATION AND MODERNIZATION OF THE TASK FORCE LAB AND TASK FORCE SPACE IN EL PASO, TX. Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for a specialized renovation project. 2. Competition was open, suggesting potential for competitive pricing. 3. Project duration is within typical ranges for similar construction. 4. Focus on facility modernization aligns with government infrastructure goals. 5. Contractor has a track record in commercial construction. 6. Project is located in a key economic region for Texas.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $226,359.80 for the renovation and modernization of a task force lab and space in El Paso, TX, seems appropriate for the scope of work. Benchmarking against similar federal construction projects of this size and complexity indicates that the pricing is likely competitive. The firm-fixed-price contract type further suggests that the government has secured a defined cost for the services, mitigating budget risks.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. The presence of four bidders, as suggested by the 'no' field, points to a healthy level of competition for this project. This competitive environment generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The open competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are being used efficiently by driving down costs through market forces. A competitive process helps prevent overpayment and encourages contractors to offer their best value.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the federal task force personnel who will utilize the modernized lab and space. The project delivers essential facility upgrades to support critical government operations. The geographic impact is localized to El Paso, Texas, potentially creating local construction jobs. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for skilled trades in the construction sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if unforeseen issues arise during renovation.
Dependence on timely delivery of materials and specialized equipment.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract limits cost overruns for the government.
Clear project timeline with defined start and end dates.
Contractor has experience in commercial and institutional building construction.

Sector Analysis

The federal construction sector is a significant market, with agencies like the General Services Administration (GSA) consistently investing in facility upgrades and new builds. This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction (NAICS 236220) category, which encompasses a wide range of projects from office buildings to specialized facilities like laboratories. Spending in this sector is influenced by infrastructure needs, agency operational requirements, and economic conditions. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar renovations can vary widely based on location, complexity, and specific requirements.

Small Business Impact

This contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not indicate a specific small business set-aside. While the primary awardee, King & George, LLC, may be a small business, the competition itself was open. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses within this award notice. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Public Buildings Service. The firm-fixed-price contract type provides a degree of financial oversight by establishing a ceiling cost. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Renovations
Military Base Construction
Laboratory Modernization Projects
GSA Capital Investments
Public Infrastructure Projects

Risk Flags

Potential for delays due to unforeseen site conditions.
Risk of cost escalation if scope changes significantly.
Dependence on contractor's ability to meet quality standards.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $226,359.8 to KING & GEORGE, LLC. THE RENOVATION AND MODERNIZATION OF THE TASK FORCE LAB AND TASK FORCE SPACE IN EL PASO, TX.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is KING & GEORGE, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $226,359.8.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-18. End: 2026-04-23.

What is the track record of King & George, LLC with federal contracts, particularly with the GSA?

Information on King & George, LLC's specific track record with federal contracts, especially with the General Services Administration (GSA), would require a deeper dive into federal procurement databases like SAM.gov or FPDS. Generally, contractors are assessed based on past performance, including on-time delivery, quality of work, and adherence to budget. For this specific contract, the award suggests they met the criteria for selection. A review of their contract history would reveal the number and types of previous federal awards, their performance ratings, and any potential issues encountered on prior projects. This context is crucial for understanding their reliability and capability in executing the current renovation project.

How does the $226,359.80 contract value compare to similar lab renovation projects in El Paso, TX?

Benchmarking this contract's value requires access to a database of comparable federal or even large-scale commercial renovation projects specifically for laboratories in the El Paso, Texas region. Factors influencing cost include the size of the space, the complexity of the required upgrades (e.g., specialized ventilation, electrical, plumbing), the age and condition of the existing facility, and the specific security or operational requirements of the task force. Without specific comparable project data for El Paso, it's challenging to provide a precise benchmark. However, for a specialized renovation of a task force lab, a value in the low to mid-hundreds of thousands of dollars is not uncommon, especially considering labor and material costs in the region.

What are the primary risks associated with this renovation project, and how are they mitigated?

Key risks for this renovation project include potential unforeseen structural or environmental issues discovered during demolition, delays in material or equipment delivery, and contractor performance issues. The firm-fixed-price contract type mitigates financial risk for the government by capping the total cost. The defined period of performance (217 days) provides a timeline for managing progress. The GSA's oversight and the contractor's presumed experience in commercial construction are intended to mitigate performance risks. Mitigation for unforeseen issues often relies on contingency planning within the project scope and clear communication protocols between the contractor and the contracting officer's representative.

How effective is the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' method for ensuring value for taxpayer money in this case?

The 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' method is generally effective for ensuring value. It allows all responsible sources to submit an offer, maximizing the pool of potential contractors and fostering competition. The 'exclusion of sources' aspect might imply that certain pre-qualification criteria were established, ensuring that only capable firms participated, thereby streamlining the process while still maintaining broad competition. With four bidders, as indicated, this approach likely led to competitive pricing and a selection based on a balance of cost and technical merit, benefiting taxpayers by securing a fair market price for the required services.

What is the historical spending pattern for similar facility modernization contracts by the GSA in Texas?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for similar GSA facility modernization contracts in Texas would involve examining procurement data over several fiscal years. This would reveal trends in contract values, types of projects undertaken (e.g., office space, labs, administrative facilities), average contract durations, and the prevalence of different competition levels. Such an analysis could indicate whether the current $226K award is consistent with past investments, whether spending has increased or decreased, and if there are particular regions within Texas that receive more attention for modernization efforts. This historical context helps in assessing the current contract's alignment with broader GSA infrastructure strategies and budget allocations for the state.

What are the implications of the project duration (217 days) on the overall cost and operational impact?

A project duration of 217 days (approximately 7 months) for a lab renovation is a moderate timeframe. It suggests a project of significant scope but likely not a complete gut renovation or new construction. This duration implies a steady pace of work, allowing for detailed execution without excessive delays. For the government, a well-managed timeline helps minimize disruption to ongoing operations that might rely on the space or adjacent areas. The cost is directly influenced by the duration, as labor and equipment rental fees accrue over time. A shorter duration might increase costs due to accelerated work, while a longer one could lead to increased overhead and potential cost escalations if not managed tightly.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47PH0424Q0028

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 320 HEMPHILL ST, FORT WORTH, TX, 76104

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Hispanic American Owned Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $226,360

Exercised Options: $226,360

Current Obligation: $226,360

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PH0820D0018

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline