GSA awards $338,774 renovation contract to LEO A. DALY LLC for Minneapolis federal building

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $338,774 ($338.8K)

Contractor: LEO a. Daly LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2021-12-17

End Date: 2025-08-08

Contract Duration: 1,330 days

Daily Burn Rate: $255/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: AE DESIGN SERVICES WORK ORDER NO. 101 FOR THE USCH MN 2ND FLOOR RENOVATIONS AT 300 S. 4TH STREET, MINNEAPOLIS MN, 55401 (MN0092ZZ)

Place of Performance

Location: MINNEAPOLIS, HENNEPIN County, MINNESOTA, 55402

State: Minnesota Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $338,773.96 to LEO A. DALY LLC for work described as: AE DESIGN SERVICES WORK ORDER NO. 101 FOR THE USCH MN 2ND FLOOR RENOVATIONS AT 300 S. 4TH STREET, MINNEAPOLIS MN, 55401 (MN0092ZZ) Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract is a delivery order under a larger agreement, indicating potential for future task orders. 3. The fixed-price nature of the contract shifts performance risk to the contractor. 4. The contract duration of 1330 days (approx. 3.6 years) suggests a significant scope of work. 5. The award to LEO A. DALY LLC, a single contractor, warrants examination of their capacity and past performance. 6. The contract is for architectural services, a critical component of public building renovations.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $338,774 for architectural services for a federal building renovation appears reasonable for the scope. However, without specific details on the renovation's complexity, square footage, or the specific services rendered (e.g., design, project management, oversight), a direct comparison to similar contracts is challenging. Benchmarking would require more granular data on the services provided and the scale of the renovation. The fixed-price contract type suggests that the contractor has priced the work to include their anticipated costs and profit.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The presence of 7 bidders (as indicated by 'no': 7) suggests a healthy level of competition for this architectural services contract. A competitive process generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more innovative solutions as contractors vie for the award.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process is beneficial for taxpayers as it helps ensure that the government receives fair market value for the services rendered, preventing potential overpayment that could occur with less competitive solicitations.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are federal agencies and employees who will utilize the renovated facilities at the U.S. Courthouse in Minneapolis. The contract delivers architectural design and potentially related services for the renovation of the 2nd floor of the federal building. The geographic impact is localized to Minneapolis, Minnesota, specifically at 300 S. 4th Street. The contract supports the architecture and design industry workforce, including architects, engineers, and related professionals employed by LEO A. DALY LLC and potentially its subcontractors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if renovation requirements are not clearly defined and managed.
Reliance on a single contractor for a multi-year project could pose risks if performance issues arise.
The fixed-price nature, while shifting risk, could lead to change orders if unforeseen conditions are encountered during renovation.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust selection process.
The fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
The contract is a delivery order under a larger agreement, suggesting a pre-vetted contractor and established relationship.

Sector Analysis

The contract falls within the Architectural Services sector (NAICS code 541310), a segment of the broader professional, scientific, and technical services industry. This sector is crucial for the planning, design, and oversight of construction and renovation projects. Federal spending in this area is often driven by infrastructure needs, facility modernization, and new construction requirements. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found in analyses of federal construction and facilities management budgets, looking at average costs per square foot for similar renovation projects or average contract values for architectural design services.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). LEO A. DALY LLC is likely a large business. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses within this specific delivery order. The absence of a small business set-aside means that opportunities for small business participation would depend on the prime contractor's own subcontracting initiatives or requirements stipulated in the parent contract.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Public Buildings Service, which manages federal real estate. Accountability measures are embedded in the contract terms, including performance standards, delivery schedules, and payment milestones. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS. The GSA's Office of Inspector General (OIG) would have jurisdiction to investigate any allegations of fraud, waste, or abuse related to this contract.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Renovations
Architectural and Engineering Services
General Services Administration Contracts
Public Buildings Service Projects
Minneapolis Federal Facilities

Risk Flags

Potential for unforeseen conditions during renovation
Contractor performance risk
Scope creep risk
Reliance on single contractor for extended duration

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $338,773.96 to LEO A. DALY LLC. AE DESIGN SERVICES WORK ORDER NO. 101 FOR THE USCH MN 2ND FLOOR RENOVATIONS AT 300 S. 4TH STREET, MINNEAPOLIS MN, 55401 (MN0092ZZ)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LEO A. DALY LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $338,773.96.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-12-17. End: 2025-08-08.

What is the track record of LEO A. DALY LLC with the federal government, particularly with the GSA?

LEO A. DALY LLC has a history of contracting with the federal government. Analyzing their past performance with the General Services Administration (GSA) and other agencies is crucial. This would involve reviewing contract databases for previous awards, performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any documented issues or successes. A strong track record with similar renovation projects, adherence to schedules and budgets, and positive client feedback would indicate lower risk. Conversely, a history of performance issues, disputes, or cost overruns on prior federal contracts could signal potential risks for this current project. Further investigation would require accessing detailed performance data beyond the basic award information.

How does the awarded amount compare to the estimated cost or budget for this renovation project?

The awarded amount of $338,774 represents the contract value agreed upon between the GSA and LEO A. DALY LLC. To assess value for money, this amount should be compared against the government's independent government cost estimate (IGCE) for the renovation. If the awarded amount is significantly lower than the IGCE, it suggests potential savings for taxpayers. However, if it is substantially higher, it could indicate an issue with the bidding process, the estimate, or the contractor's pricing strategy. Without access to the IGCE or detailed project scope, it's difficult to definitively state if this is a good value. The number of bidders (7) suggests competitive pressure, which typically drives prices down towards the market rate.

What are the specific architectural services included in this delivery order, and what is the scope of the renovation?

The provided data identifies the contract as being for 'Architectural Services' related to 'USCH MN 2ND FLOOR RENOVATIONS.' However, the specific deliverables and the precise scope of work are not detailed. Architectural services can encompass a wide range of activities, including schematic design, design development, construction documents, bidding assistance, construction administration, and interior design. The renovation scope could range from minor cosmetic upgrades to a complete gut and remodel. Understanding these specifics is vital for assessing the contract's value, risks, and potential impact. For instance, a comprehensive renovation requiring extensive structural or MEP (mechanical, electrical, plumbing) design would justify a higher contract value than a simple interior refresh.

What is the historical spending pattern for architectural services at the Minneapolis federal building or similar GSA facilities?

Analyzing historical spending for architectural services at this specific Minneapolis federal building, or comparable GSA-managed facilities in similar geographic locations, would provide valuable context. This involves examining past contracts for design, renovation, or facility upgrades awarded by the GSA or other agencies for similar building types and sizes. Trends in contract values, duration, and competition levels over time can reveal patterns. For example, consistent high spending might indicate ongoing facility needs or deferred maintenance. Conversely, a sudden increase in spending could signal a major modernization effort. Benchmarking against historical data helps determine if the current $338,774 award is within expected ranges or represents an anomaly.

Are there any known risks associated with renovating federal buildings, particularly older ones like the U.S. Courthouse in Minneapolis?

Renovating federal buildings, especially older ones like the U.S. Courthouse in Minneapolis, carries inherent risks. These can include the discovery of unforeseen conditions such as hazardous materials (e.g., asbestos, lead paint), structural issues, outdated electrical or plumbing systems, or accessibility deficiencies not apparent during initial assessments. Such discoveries can lead to significant scope changes, cost overruns, and schedule delays. Furthermore, working within occupied federal facilities presents logistical challenges related to security, noise, dust control, and maintaining essential services for ongoing operations. The GSA's experience and the contractor's expertise in managing these risks are critical factors for project success.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Architectural Services

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - CONSTRUCTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 7

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 730 2ND AVE S STE 1300, MINNEAPOLIS, MN, 55402

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $338,774

Exercised Options: $338,774

Current Obligation: $338,774

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PF0020D0031

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline