GSA awards $4.96M contract for IRS parking lot lighting in Memphis, TN to Wright Bros LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $4,960,674 ($5.0M)

Contractor: Wright Bros LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2024-08-05

End Date: 2026-04-09

Contract Duration: 612 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: DESIGN BUILD IRS PARKING LOT LIGHTING PROJECT, IRS FACILITY MEMPHIS, TN. PROJECT LOCATED AT BUILDING TN0005ZZ.

Place of Performance

Location: MEMPHIS, SHELBY County, TENNESSEE, 38118

State: Tennessee Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $5.0 million to WRIGHT BROS LLC for work described as: DESIGN BUILD IRS PARKING LOT LIGHTING PROJECT, IRS FACILITY MEMPHIS, TN. PROJECT LOCATED AT BUILDING TN0005ZZ. Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The project involves construction services for IRS facilities, indicating infrastructure investment. 3. The firm-fixed-price contract type aims to control costs for the government. 4. The duration of 612 days suggests a significant scope for the lighting project. 5. The contract is a delivery order, likely part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) vehicle. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 236220 points to commercial and institutional building construction.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of approximately $4.96 million for a parking lot lighting project appears to be within a reasonable range for a project of this scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar federal construction projects for lighting and site improvements would provide a more precise assessment of value for money. The firm-fixed-price structure helps mitigate cost overruns, but the final value is dependent on the contractor's efficiency and material costs over the project's 612-day timeline.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources,' which is a specific type of competitive procurement. While it indicates competition, the 'exclusion of sources' clause suggests that certain pre-qualified or previously vetted sources may have been considered, or that specific requirements limited the pool of eligible bidders. The presence of 4 bids (no: 4) indicates some level of competition, but the exact nature of the exclusion needs further review to understand its impact on price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive process, even with exclusions, generally benefits taxpayers by encouraging multiple firms to offer their best pricing. However, the extent of competition directly influences the downward pressure on prices. More bidders typically lead to better deals for the government.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), which will receive improved lighting and security at its Memphis, TN facility. The project will deliver construction services focused on upgrading parking lot lighting infrastructure. The geographic impact is localized to Memphis, Tennessee, specifically at IRS Facility TN0005ZZ. The project will likely involve a workforce of construction laborers, electricians, and project managers, contributing to local employment in the skilled trades.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The 'exclusion of sources' in the competition type warrants further investigation to ensure it did not unduly limit competition and potentially increase costs.
The project duration of 612 days is substantial for a lighting project; efficiency and timely completion will be key to cost-effectiveness.
The firm-fixed-price contract, while good for cost control, places the risk of cost overruns on the contractor, which could lead to quality compromises if not managed closely.

Positive Signals

Awarded through a competitive process, indicating multiple bids were considered.
The firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
The project addresses necessary infrastructure improvements for a federal facility.

Sector Analysis

The construction sector, particularly commercial and institutional building construction (NAICS 236220), is a significant area of federal spending. This contract falls within the broader category of facilities maintenance and upgrade projects. Federal spending in this sector often involves a mix of new construction, renovations, and specialized upgrades like lighting systems. Comparable projects can range widely in cost depending on scale, location, and specific requirements, but projects in the multi-million dollar range are common for significant facility improvements.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses arising from a small business set-aside. The primary contractor, Wright Bros LLC, is responsible for managing the project, and any subcontracting decisions would be at their discretion, potentially offering opportunities to small businesses if Wright Bros LLC chooses to engage them.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Public Buildings Service, which oversees federal real estate and facilities. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract terms, requiring Wright Bros LLC to deliver the specified lighting improvements within the agreed-upon price and timeline. Transparency is facilitated through federal contract databases where this award is reported. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building and Facilities Construction
Infrastructure Improvement Projects
Public Lighting Systems
IRS Facility Maintenance

Risk Flags

Potential for limited competition due to 'exclusion of sources'
Risk of project delays impacting schedule and cost
Need for diligent oversight to ensure quality under fixed-price contract

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $5.0 million to WRIGHT BROS LLC. DESIGN BUILD IRS PARKING LOT LIGHTING PROJECT, IRS FACILITY MEMPHIS, TN. PROJECT LOCATED AT BUILDING TN0005ZZ.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is WRIGHT BROS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $5.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-08-05. End: 2026-04-09.

What is the track record of Wright Bros LLC in completing federal construction contracts of similar size and scope?

A review of federal contract databases would be necessary to fully assess Wright Bros LLC's track record. Information such as past performance ratings, history of contract modifications, on-time completion rates, and any past disputes or litigation would provide insight into their reliability and capability. For a $4.96 million project with a 612-day duration, it is important to understand if they have successfully managed projects of comparable complexity and value. Without specific historical data on Wright Bros LLC's performance on similar federal contracts, it is difficult to definitively assess their suitability beyond the fact that they were awarded this contract through a competitive process.

How does the awarded price of $4.96 million compare to similar federal parking lot lighting projects?

Benchmarking this $4.96 million contract against similar federal parking lot lighting projects requires access to a database of comparable contracts, including their scope, size, location, and duration. Factors such as the number of fixtures, type of lighting technology (e.g., LED vs. traditional), complexity of the site (e.g., underground wiring, existing infrastructure), and prevailing labor and material costs in Memphis, TN, would influence the price. Generally, projects of this magnitude for infrastructure upgrades at federal facilities are substantial investments. A detailed cost breakdown from the contractor, if available, would allow for a more granular comparison of unit costs (e.g., cost per fixture, cost per linear foot of wiring).

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Key risks include potential delays due to weather, unforeseen site conditions, material availability issues, or labor shortages, all of which could impact the 612-day schedule. Cost risks are mitigated by the firm-fixed-price contract, which shifts cost overrun responsibility to Wright Bros LLC. However, this could incentivize cutting corners on quality if not properly monitored. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust project management by GSA, clear communication channels, regular site inspections, and adherence to contract specifications. The 'exclusion of sources' in the competition type also presents a potential risk if it limited the competitive pool too severely, potentially leading to a less optimal price.

How effective is the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' procurement method in ensuring value for taxpayers?

This procurement method aims to balance competition with specific requirements that might necessitate excluding certain types of sources. While 'full and open' implies broad solicitation, the 'exclusion of sources' clause suggests that only a subset of potential offerors were eligible. The effectiveness in ensuring value for taxpayers depends heavily on the justification for the exclusion and the number of remaining eligible bidders. If the exclusion was narrowly tailored and still resulted in robust competition (e.g., 4 bidders), it could be effective. However, if the exclusion significantly narrowed the field, it might have reduced price competition, potentially leading to higher costs than a truly unrestricted full and open competition. The number of bids (4) suggests some competition, but the impact of the exclusion needs further analysis.

What is the historical spending pattern for IRS parking lot lighting projects or similar infrastructure upgrades at federal facilities?

Historical spending on IRS parking lot lighting or similar infrastructure upgrades at federal facilities can vary significantly based on the agency's real estate portfolio, age of facilities, and modernization priorities. Agencies like the IRS often manage numerous facilities across the country, requiring ongoing investment in maintenance and upgrades. Spending patterns are influenced by budget allocations, infrastructure condition assessments, and security requirements. Analyzing past GSA or IRS contracts for similar projects would reveal trends in contract values, durations, and types of services procured. This specific $4.96 million contract represents a single investment in one facility, and its context within broader federal infrastructure spending would require a larger dataset analysis.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47PE0124R0003

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 110 MANHATTAN DR, ANDALUSIA, AL, 36420

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, HUBZone Firm, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $4,960,674

Exercised Options: $4,960,674

Current Obligation: $4,960,674

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PE1921D0013

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline