Flooring replacement at Sioux Falls Courthouse awarded to BHI Construction for $12,376.37

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,376 ($12.4K)

Contractor: BHI Construction, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-03-26

End Date: 2026-05-25

Contract Duration: 60 days

Daily Burn Rate: $206/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: THIS CONTRACT IS REMOVE AND REPLACE FLOORING IN THE KITCHENETTE AT THE SIOUX FALLS, SOUTH DAKOTA FEDERAL COURTHOUSE LOCATED AT 400 SOUTH PHILLIS STREET, SIOUX FALLS, SOUTH DAKOTA 57104.

Place of Performance

Location: SIOUX FALLS, MINNEHAHA County, SOUTH DAKOTA, 57104

State: South Dakota Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $12,376.37 to BHI CONSTRUCTION, LLC for work described as: THIS CONTRACT IS REMOVE AND REPLACE FLOORING IN THE KITCHENETTE AT THE SIOUX FALLS, SOUTH DAKOTA FEDERAL COURTHOUSE LOCATED AT 400 SOUTH PHILLIS STREET, SIOUX FALLS, SOUTH DAKOTA 57104. Key points: 1. Contract value is relatively small, suggesting a focused scope of work. 2. Awarded to BHI Construction, LLC, a single entity. 3. Competition details are limited, but noted as 'COMPETED UNDER SAP'. 4. Fixed-price contract type aims to control costs. 5. Performance period is short, indicating a quick turnaround project. 6. Geographic focus is specific to Sioux Falls, South Dakota.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $12,376.37 for flooring replacement appears reasonable for a small-scale renovation project. Without specific benchmarks for similar courthouse kitchenette flooring projects, a direct value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the firm-fixed-price structure suggests an attempt to manage costs upfront. The limited scope likely contributes to the modest overall cost.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The contract was 'COMPETED UNDER SAP' (Simplified Acquisition Procedures), which typically involves a less formal bidding process than full and open competition. The number of bidders is not specified, making it difficult to assess the level of competition. SAP is generally used for acquisitions below certain dollar thresholds, and while it allows for competition, it may not always yield the same price discovery as larger, more open solicitations.

Taxpayer Impact: For taxpayers, competition under SAP can still offer value, but the potential for lower prices might be reduced compared to broader solicitations with more bidders.

Public Impact

Federal courthouse staff in Sioux Falls will benefit from an updated kitchenette. The service delivered is the removal and replacement of flooring. The geographic impact is localized to the federal courthouse in Sioux Falls, South Dakota. Workforce implications are minimal, likely involving a small construction crew for a short duration.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed competition data hinders full assessment of price competitiveness.
Scope is narrow, potentially limiting broader economic impact.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Short performance period suggests efficient project execution.
Specific location identified for clear project delivery.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, specifically focusing on interior renovation. The General Services Administration (GSA) frequently procures such services to maintain federal facilities. While the dollar amount is small, it represents a typical expenditure for localized facility upkeep within the broader construction market, which encompasses a vast range of project sizes and values.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor is there an indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. This suggests that the primary awardee, BHI Construction, LLC, is either a large business or a small business that did not require a specific set-aside to win the contract. The impact on the broader small business ecosystem is likely negligible given the contract's size and lack of specific small business provisions.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the General Services Administration's Public Buildings Service. As a firm-fixed-price contract awarded under SAP, the primary accountability measure is adherence to the contract terms and completion within the specified timeframe and budget. Transparency is limited by the nature of SAP, but basic award information is publicly available. There is no specific mention of an Inspector General's direct involvement for a contract of this scale, though GSA OIG has broad jurisdiction.

Related Government Programs

Federal Courthouse Maintenance
GSA Facility Renovations
Commercial Building Construction Services

Risk Flags

Limited competition data
Potential for unforeseen site conditions

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $12,376.37 to BHI CONSTRUCTION, LLC. THIS CONTRACT IS REMOVE AND REPLACE FLOORING IN THE KITCHENETTE AT THE SIOUX FALLS, SOUTH DAKOTA FEDERAL COURTHOUSE LOCATED AT 400 SOUTH PHILLIS STREET, SIOUX FALLS, SOUTH DAKOTA 57104.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BHI CONSTRUCTION, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12,376.37.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-03-26. End: 2026-05-25.

What is the track record of BHI Construction, LLC with federal contracts?

Information regarding BHI Construction, LLC's specific track record with federal contracts is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive analysis would require searching federal procurement databases like SAM.gov or FPDS to identify past performance, contract types, agencies served, and any history of performance issues or awards. Without this external data, it's impossible to assess their reliability or experience level beyond this single award.

How does the price compare to similar flooring replacement contracts?

Benchmarking this $12,376.37 contract against similar flooring replacement projects is difficult without more specific data on the scope, materials, and location of comparable contracts. Flooring projects can vary significantly in cost based on square footage, type of flooring (e.g., vinyl, tile, carpet), preparation work required, and labor rates in the specific geographic area. Given the small value and specific location (kitchenette), it's likely priced for a contained area, making direct comparison to larger renovation projects unreliable.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract?

The primary risks for this contract are relatively low due to its small size and defined scope. Potential risks include minor delays in material delivery or contractor scheduling, unforeseen issues with the existing subfloor requiring additional work (though the fixed-price nature limits cost impact unless a change order is issued), and ensuring the quality of the finished flooring meets GSA standards. The short duration and specific task minimize complex integration or performance risks.

How effective is this contract in meeting the agency's needs?

The effectiveness of this contract hinges on its ability to successfully replace the kitchenette flooring within the specified timeframe and budget, thereby improving the facility's condition and usability. Assuming BHI Construction, LLC performs as contracted, the agency's need for updated flooring will be met. The limited scope suggests this is a routine maintenance or minor upgrade task, likely contributing positively to the overall facility management objectives of the GSA.

What are historical spending patterns for flooring at this specific courthouse?

Historical spending data for flooring at the Sioux Falls Federal Courthouse is not provided. To analyze this, one would need to examine past GSA procurement records for this specific facility, looking for similar contracts related to flooring, renovations, or general maintenance over previous years. Understanding historical spending could reveal patterns of deferred maintenance, frequency of upgrades, or changes in contract values over time.

What is the potential impact of 'COMPETED UNDER SAP' on the final price?

Competing under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) generally means the acquisition process is less formal and may involve fewer bidders than full and open competition. While SAP is intended to promote competition for smaller purchases, the reduced number of potential bidders and less stringent solicitation requirements can sometimes lead to prices that are not as aggressively negotiated as those resulting from broader, more competitive processes. However, for smaller contracts, the administrative savings of SAP can also contribute to overall efficiency.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 27240 SD HIGHWAY 115, HARRISBURG, SD, 57032

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $12,376

Exercised Options: $12,376

Current Obligation: $12,376

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED

Timeline