GSA awards $241K contract for courthouse bird control netting installation and cleaning services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $24,176 ($24.2K)

Contractor: Fedcap Rehabilitation Services, Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-09

End Date: 2026-08-09

Contract Duration: 122 days

Daily Burn Rate: $198/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE LABOR AND MATERIALS TO DISINFECT AND CLEAN SILLS IN COURTYARD AREA BEFORE INSTALLING BIRD CONTROL NETTING IN THE COURTYARD AREA OF 271 CADMAN PLAZA EAST, DUBERSTEIN COURTHOUSE.

Place of Performance

Location: BROOKLYN, KINGS County, NEW YORK, 11201

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $24,175.8 to FEDCAP REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC for work described as: CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE LABOR AND MATERIALS TO DISINFECT AND CLEAN SILLS IN COURTYARD AREA BEFORE INSTALLING BIRD CONTROL NETTING IN THE COURTYARD AREA OF 271 CADMAN PLAZA EAST, DUBERSTEIN COURTHOUSE. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on specialized facilities maintenance for a specific courthouse location. 2. Limited competition due to the specialized nature of the services required. 3. Performance period is relatively short, indicating a project-specific need. 4. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, providing cost certainty. 5. Contractor has a history of providing services to government agencies. 6. Geographic focus is on New York City.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $241,755.80 for a 122-day period appears reasonable for specialized facilities maintenance involving cleaning and installation of bird control netting. Benchmarking against similar, smaller-scale pest control or specialized cleaning contracts suggests this price is within an expected range for the scope of work. However, without more detailed cost breakdowns or comparisons to industry-standard pricing for such niche services, a definitive value-for-money assessment is challenging. The General Services Administration (GSA) typically aims for competitive pricing, but the limited competition may have influenced the final cost.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

This contract was not competed under the Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), suggesting it may have been awarded through a limited competition or a pre-existing agreement like a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call. The data indicates it was 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP', which implies a less open bidding process than full and open competition. The specific details of how this limited competition was conducted are not provided, but it suggests that only a select number of vendors were solicited or that it leveraged an existing contract vehicle. This approach can expedite service delivery but may reduce opportunities for broader price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: For taxpayers, limited competition can sometimes lead to higher prices compared to a fully open bidding process where multiple vendors vie for the contract. While it can ensure specialized needs are met efficiently, it reduces the downward pressure on costs that robust competition provides.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the occupants and visitors of the Duberstein Courthouse, who will experience a cleaner and more pest-free environment. Services delivered include specialized cleaning of sills and installation of bird control netting. The geographic impact is localized to the 271 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn, NY location. Workforce implications are minimal, likely involving a small team for the specific task.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed cost breakdown makes it difficult to fully assess value for money.
Limited competition may have resulted in a higher price than a fully open bid.
The specific nature of 'disinfect and clean sills' could be subject to interpretation and scope creep if not clearly defined.

Positive Signals

Firm Fixed Price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Contractor (FEDCAP REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC) has experience with government contracts.
Clear end date ensures project completion within a defined timeframe.

Sector Analysis

The Facilities Support Services sector encompasses a wide range of services aimed at maintaining and operating buildings and grounds. This contract falls within a niche segment of this sector, focusing on specialized cleaning and pest/bird control measures. The market for such services can be fragmented, with many small to medium-sized businesses offering specialized solutions. Government spending in this area is consistent, driven by the need to maintain federal properties. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish without more granular data on the specific materials and labor involved in bird netting installation and specialized disinfection.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded to FEDCAP REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC. The data indicates that small business set-aside was not utilized (sb: false) and the contract was not competed under SAP, which often includes provisions for small businesses. Therefore, this specific award does not appear to directly benefit small businesses through a set-aside. However, the prime contractor may engage small businesses as subcontractors, though this is not specified in the provided data. The impact on the broader small business ecosystem is likely minimal for this particular contract.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Public Buildings Service (PBS). The Firm Fixed Price contract type provides a degree of financial oversight by fixing the total cost. Performance monitoring would likely involve site inspections and verification of completed work against the contract's scope. Transparency is moderate, as contract awards are generally public, but the details of the limited competition process and cost justification may not be fully accessible. There is no specific mention of Inspector General jurisdiction for this particular task order, but the GSA OIG has broad authority over GSA contracts.

Related Government Programs

Federal Facilities Maintenance Contracts
Pest and Wildlife Control Services
Building Cleaning Services
GSA Multiple Award Schedule (MAS) Contracts (potential vehicle)
Architectural Barriers Act Compliance

Risk Flags

Limited Competition
Potential for Cost Overruns if Scope is Not Well-Defined
Reliance on Contractor's Specialized Expertise

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $24,175.8 to FEDCAP REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE LABOR AND MATERIALS TO DISINFECT AND CLEAN SILLS IN COURTYARD AREA BEFORE INSTALLING BIRD CONTROL NETTING IN THE COURTYARD AREA OF 271 CADMAN PLAZA EAST, DUBERSTEIN COURTHOUSE.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is FEDCAP REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $24,175.8.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-09. End: 2026-08-09.

What is the track record of FEDCAP REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC. in performing similar government contracts?

FEDCAP REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC. has a history of performing government contracts, including those with agencies like the General Services Administration (GSA). Their experience often spans various service areas, potentially including facilities maintenance and support. While specific details on past performance for bird control netting or specialized disinfection are not provided in this data snippet, their general presence in the government contracting space suggests familiarity with federal procurement processes and requirements. A deeper dive into their contract history, past performance evaluations (e.g., CPARS), and any reported issues would be necessary for a comprehensive assessment of their suitability and reliability for this specific task.

How does the cost of this contract compare to industry benchmarks for similar specialized cleaning and netting installation services?

Benchmarking the cost of this $241,755.80 contract for 122 days is challenging without specific industry data for 'disinfecting and cleaning sills' coupled with 'bird control netting installation' in a courthouse setting. These are niche services. Generally, specialized cleaning can be labor-intensive and require specific materials or expertise, driving up costs. Bird control netting installation also requires skilled labor and appropriate materials to be effective and durable. Given the limited competition indicated, the price might be at the higher end of a typical range. A more precise comparison would require accessing databases of similar government or commercial contracts, factoring in geographic location (New York City), and the specific scope of work.

What are the potential risks associated with the limited competition for this contract?

The primary risk associated with limited competition is the potential for reduced price savings for the government. When fewer bidders are involved, there is less pressure to offer the most competitive pricing. This could lead to the government paying more than it might in a fully open and competitive environment. Additionally, limited competition might restrict the pool of available expertise, potentially leading to a less optimal solution if the chosen contractor is not the best fit for the specific requirements. There's also a risk that the government may not be aware of all qualified vendors capable of performing the work effectively.

How effective are GSA's oversight mechanisms in ensuring value and performance for contracts like this?

GSA employs several oversight mechanisms to ensure value and performance. For contracts like this, the use of a Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract provides cost certainty. Performance monitoring typically involves contract officers' representatives (CORs) or contracting officers (COs) who oversee the contractor's work, conduct site visits, and verify deliverables against the contract statement of work. GSA also maintains performance evaluation systems (like CPARS) for contractors. Transparency is generally supported through public contract databases. However, the effectiveness can vary based on the resources allocated to oversight, the clarity of the contract requirements, and the diligence of the contracting personnel involved in monitoring the specific task.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services at the Duberstein Courthouse or similar GSA-managed courthouses?

Historical spending patterns for facilities support services at the Duberstein Courthouse or similar GSA-managed courthouses would typically show consistent investment in maintenance, repair, and operational needs. This includes routine cleaning, groundskeeping, HVAC maintenance, and security systems. Specialized services like pest control or specific installations (like bird netting) might appear less frequently, often driven by specific issues or capital improvement projects. Analyzing past GSA spending data for this specific courthouse or a cohort of similar facilities could reveal trends in the types and costs of services procured, helping to contextualize the current $241K award. Without access to that specific historical data, it's difficult to provide precise figures.

What are the implications of using a BPA Call for this type of specialized service?

Using a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call for specialized services like this can offer several advantages. BPAs are established vehicles that allow agencies to streamline the procurement of recurring or anticipated needs. A BPA Call, specifically, is an order placed against an existing BPA. This method can significantly reduce administrative burden and lead time compared to initiating a new procurement from scratch. It often leverages pre-negotiated terms and pricing, potentially offering better value. However, the effectiveness relies on the quality of the underlying BPA and the competition conducted during its establishment. If the BPA itself was not competitively established or if the call is not properly competed among BPA holders, it could limit price discovery.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Solicitation ID: EQPMAG-26-0253

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 633 3RD AVE 6TH FL, NEW YORK, NY, 10017

Business Categories: AbilityOne Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $24,176

Exercised Options: $24,176

Current Obligation: $24,176

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PC0722A0005

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline