GSA awards $24.5K for courthouse window replacement, highlighting facilities support needs

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $24,476 ($24.5K)

Contractor: Fedcap Rehabilitation Services, Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-02

End Date: 2026-08-02

Contract Duration: 122 days

Daily Burn Rate: $201/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE LABOR AND MATERIALS TO REPLACE BROKEN WINDOWS ON 1ST FLOOR TILLARY IN ROOSEVELT COURTHOUSE @ 225 CADMAN PLAZA EAST. TWO BALLISTIC WINDOWS TOTAL AND ONE BOX DESIGN WINDOW.

Place of Performance

Location: BROOKLYN, KINGS County, NEW YORK, 11201

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $24,475.5 to FEDCAP REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC for work described as: CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE LABOR AND MATERIALS TO REPLACE BROKEN WINDOWS ON 1ST FLOOR TILLARY IN ROOSEVELT COURTHOUSE @ 225 CADMAN PLAZA EAST. TWO BALLISTIC WINDOWS TOTAL AND ONE BOX DESIGN WINDOW. Key points: 1. Contract addresses critical infrastructure repair for public safety. 2. Limited competition suggests potential for higher costs. 3. Single award indicates specific contractor capability or urgency. 4. Fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government. 5. Project duration is short, focusing on immediate repair needs. 6. Geographic focus on New York highlights regional facility maintenance.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $24,575.50 for replacing three windows, including two ballistic windows, appears reasonable for specialized repair work. However, without specific details on the type and complexity of the windows, a direct comparison to similar contracts is difficult. The firm fixed-price nature of the award provides cost predictability, but the lack of competition may have prevented a more competitive price discovery process. Benchmarking against market rates for ballistic window installation would offer further insight into value for money.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed under the Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) and was awarded as a sole-source BPA Call. This indicates that the General Services Administration (GSA) likely identified a specific need that could only be met by FEDCAP REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC., or that the procurement process was streamlined due to the low dollar value. The lack of competition means that taxpayers did not benefit from a bidding process that could have potentially driven down the price.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards limit the opportunity for multiple vendors to compete, potentially leading to higher prices than if the contract had been openly competed. This can result in less optimal use of taxpayer funds for this specific repair.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the occupants and visitors of the Roosevelt Courthouse, who will have enhanced security and functionality with new windows. The services delivered include the replacement of two ballistic windows and one box design window, crucial for security and building integrity. The geographic impact is localized to the Roosevelt Courthouse located at 225 Cadman Plaza East in New York. The contract supports the facilities maintenance workforce, potentially through FEDCAP REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC.'s employment of skilled labor for installation.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition may lead to inflated pricing.
Sole-source award limits transparency in price negotiation.
Reliance on a single vendor could pose future supply chain risks.

Positive Signals

Addresses immediate and critical infrastructure need.
Firm fixed-price contract provides budget certainty.
Contractor is likely experienced in facilities support services.

Sector Analysis

The facilities support services sector encompasses a broad range of activities, including maintenance, repair, and operations for government buildings. This contract falls within the niche of specialized building repair, specifically window replacement, which can include security features like ballistic glass. The market for such services is competitive, but specialized requirements can lead to limited vendor pools. The General Services Administration (GSA) is a major procurer of these services to maintain its vast portfolio of federal buildings.

Small Business Impact

This contract was awarded to FEDCAP REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC. and was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses mentioned. FEDCAP REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC. is a non-profit organization that provides employment and training for people with barriers to employment, including individuals with disabilities. While not a traditional small business set-aside, the award aligns with supporting organizations that have a social mission, which can indirectly benefit the small business ecosystem through partnerships or by demonstrating successful models.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Public Buildings Service. As a sole-source award under a BPA Call, the oversight would focus on ensuring the work is completed according to the specifications and within the fixed price. Transparency is limited due to the non-competitive nature, but contract performance would be monitored. There is no explicit mention of an Inspector General's jurisdiction for this specific small award, but GSA's OIG generally oversees GSA contracts.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Maintenance Contracts
General Services Administration Facilities Management
Courthouse Security Upgrades
Ballistic Window Procurement
Facilities Support Services

Risk Flags

Sole-source award
Lack of competition
Potential for uncompetitive pricing

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $24,475.5 to FEDCAP REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE LABOR AND MATERIALS TO REPLACE BROKEN WINDOWS ON 1ST FLOOR TILLARY IN ROOSEVELT COURTHOUSE @ 225 CADMAN PLAZA EAST. TWO BALLISTIC WINDOWS TOTAL AND ONE BOX DESIGN WINDOW.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is FEDCAP REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $24,475.5.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-02. End: 2026-08-02.

What is the track record of FEDCAP REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC. in performing similar facilities maintenance and repair contracts for the federal government?

FEDCAP REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC. has a history of performing various services for the federal government, often related to their mission of providing employment and training for individuals with barriers. While specific details on their track record for complex window replacements, particularly ballistic ones, are not immediately available from this data, their designation as a provider suggests experience in service delivery. Further investigation into their past performance reports (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS) would be necessary to fully assess their capabilities and reliability for this specific type of work. Their broader experience in facilities support and rehabilitation suggests a capacity to manage such projects, though the specialized nature of ballistic windows warrants closer scrutiny.

How does the price of $24,575.50 for three windows compare to market rates for similar installations, especially considering the ballistic requirement?

Benchmarking the price of $24,575.50 for three windows, including two ballistic ones, against market rates is challenging without detailed specifications of the windows (size, thickness, threat level for ballistic glass) and labor costs in New York. Ballistic windows are significantly more expensive than standard glass due to their specialized manufacturing and testing. A single ballistic window can range from several hundred to several thousand dollars depending on its rating. Given this, the total cost for three windows, with two being ballistic, might be within a reasonable range if the ballistic specifications are high. However, the lack of competition means there's no direct market comparison from this specific procurement to confirm optimal value for money.

What are the specific risks associated with awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and how are they mitigated?

The primary risk of a sole-source award is the potential for paying a higher price than would be achieved through competition, as the contractor faces less pressure to offer their best price. There's also a risk that the chosen contractor may not be the most capable or innovative, although in this case, FEDCAP REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC. is a known entity. Mitigation strategies for this contract would involve rigorous negotiation of the fixed price, clear definition of scope and deliverables, and close monitoring of performance to ensure quality and timely completion. The GSA's oversight mechanisms are crucial here to ensure the government receives fair value despite the lack of competitive bidding.

What is the expected impact of this contract on the security and functionality of the Roosevelt Courthouse?

This contract is expected to significantly enhance the security and functionality of the Roosevelt Courthouse by replacing damaged or outdated windows with new ones, including two ballistic windows. Ballistic windows are designed to withstand forced entry and projectile impacts, thereby improving the physical security of the facility and protecting its occupants. The replacement of any broken windows also addresses immediate safety concerns and maintains the building's structural integrity and weatherproofing. Overall, the project contributes to a safer and more secure working environment within the courthouse.

What is the historical spending pattern for facilities support services at the Roosevelt Courthouse or similar GSA-managed facilities in New York?

Historical spending patterns for facilities support services at the Roosevelt Courthouse or similar GSA-managed facilities in New York would typically involve recurring costs for maintenance, repairs, cleaning, and potentially upgrades. This specific contract for window replacement represents a capital repair expenditure rather than routine maintenance. Analyzing past GSA spending data for this courthouse or comparable buildings in the region would reveal the frequency and cost of similar repair projects. Without access to that specific historical data, it's difficult to contextualize this $24.5K expenditure within a broader trend, but it highlights the ongoing need for infrastructure upkeep in federal buildings.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Solicitation ID: EQ2PSEB-26-0050

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 633 3RD AVE 6TH FL, NEW YORK, NY, 10017

Business Categories: AbilityOne Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $24,476

Exercised Options: $24,476

Current Obligation: $24,476

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PC0722A0005

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline