GSA awards $30.7M facilities support contract to Fedcap Rehabilitation Services, Inc. for Brooklyn building

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $30,668,135 ($30.7M)

Contractor: Fedcap Rehabilitation Services, Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2022-08-01

End Date: 2026-07-31

Contract Duration: 1,460 days

Daily Burn Rate: $21.0K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: CFM FOR 271 AND 225 CADMAN PLAZA EAST.

Place of Performance

Location: BROOKLYN, KINGS County, NEW YORK, 11201

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $30.7 million to FEDCAP REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC for work described as: CFM FOR 271 AND 225 CADMAN PLAZA EAST. Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a firm-fixed-price basis, indicating predictable costs for the government. 2. The contract was not competed under simplified acquisition procedures, suggesting potential for higher costs. 3. Fedcap Rehabilitation Services, Inc. is the sole awardee, raising questions about competition. 4. The contract duration of 1460 days (4 years) provides long-term service stability. 5. Services are concentrated in New York, NY, with specific focus on facilities support. 6. The award is a BPA Call, indicating it's part of a larger pre-negotiated agreement.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without more detailed service descriptions and comparable contract data. The firm-fixed-price structure helps control costs, but the lack of competition may have led to a higher price than if it had been competed. The total value of $30.7 million over four years averages to approximately $7.67 million annually, which needs to be assessed against the specific scope of facilities support services provided.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded as a sole-source BPA Call, meaning it was not openly competed. While the data indicates it was not competed under simplified acquisition procedures, the specific justification for a sole-source award is not provided. This approach limits the opportunity for multiple vendors to bid, potentially reducing price discovery and innovation.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards can result in higher costs for taxpayers as competition is absent, potentially leading to less favorable pricing compared to a fully competed contract.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the General Services Administration (GSA) and the federal employees working in the building at 271 and 225 Cadman Plaza East, Brooklyn, NY. The contract delivers essential facilities support services, ensuring the operational integrity and maintenance of the federal building. Geographic impact is localized to New York City, specifically Brooklyn. Workforce implications may include employment opportunities for individuals employed by Fedcap Rehabilitation Services, Inc. and its subcontractors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition may lead to higher costs for taxpayers.
Sole-source award requires strong justification to ensure fair pricing.
Limited transparency into the specific services and performance metrics without further data.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Long contract duration ensures service continuity.
Fedcap Rehabilitation Services, Inc. is an established provider, potentially bringing expertise.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services fall under the broader commercial real estate and building management sector. This contract represents a significant investment in maintaining federal property infrastructure. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other GSA contracts for similar building sizes and service scopes within major metropolitan areas. The market for these services is competitive, but specific government contracts can sometimes be awarded non-competitively.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a small business set-aside. The primary contractor, Fedcap Rehabilitation Services, Inc., may engage small businesses as subcontractors, but this is not mandated by the contract terms as presented.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the purview of the General Services Administration's Public Buildings Service. Accountability measures are usually embedded within the contract's performance standards and reporting requirements. Transparency is dependent on GSA's public disclosure policies regarding contract awards and performance. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building Maintenance Contracts
GSA Facilities Management
Public Buildings Service Contracts
Building Operations and Maintenance

Risk Flags

Sole-source award lacks competition
Potential for above-market pricing
Requires robust performance monitoring

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $30.7 million to FEDCAP REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC. CFM FOR 271 AND 225 CADMAN PLAZA EAST.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is FEDCAP REHABILITATION SERVICES, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $30.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-08-01. End: 2026-07-31.

What specific facilities support services are included under this contract?

The provided data categorizes this contract under NAICS code 561210, which corresponds to Facilities Support Services. This typically encompasses a range of activities such as building operations, maintenance, cleaning, security, groundskeeping, and potentially specialized services like pest control or waste management. However, the exact scope of services for this specific $30.7 million contract with Fedcap Rehabilitation Services, Inc. is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive understanding would require reviewing the contract's statement of work (SOW) or performance work statement (PWS), which outlines the precise deliverables, performance standards, and reporting requirements.

What is the justification for this contract being awarded on a sole-source basis?

The data indicates the contract was awarded as a 'BPA CALL' and 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP'. While 'SAP' refers to Simplified Acquisition Procedures (typically for contracts under $250,000), the 'NOT COMPETED' designation alongside 'sole-source' implies that a full and open competition was not conducted. Government agencies must have a documented justification for sole-source awards, often citing reasons such as urgency, unique capabilities of a single provider, or when only one source is reasonably available. Without access to the contract file or justification documentation, the specific rationale for this sole-source award to Fedcap Rehabilitation Services, Inc. remains unclear. This lack of competition is a key area for scrutiny regarding potential value for money.

How does the annual cost of this contract compare to similar facilities support contracts managed by GSA?

The total contract value is $30,668,134.52 over 1460 days (4 years), averaging approximately $7,667,033.63 per year. Benchmarking this annual cost requires comparing it to similar facilities support contracts managed by GSA for buildings of comparable size, age, and location in New York City. Factors such as the specific services included (e.g., janitorial, HVAC maintenance, security, landscaping), service levels, and prevailing market rates for labor and materials in the region are critical. Without access to GSA's internal contract database or publicly available data on comparable contracts, a precise benchmark is difficult. However, the sole-source nature of this award raises a flag that the price might be higher than if it had been competitively bid.

What is Fedcap Rehabilitation Services, Inc.'s track record with federal contracts, particularly with GSA?

Fedcap Rehabilitation Services, Inc. has a history of receiving federal contracts, often related to providing employment and rehabilitation services, including those for individuals with disabilities. Their involvement in facilities support services, as indicated by this award, suggests an expansion or specialization in this area. To assess their track record specifically for GSA facilities contracts, one would need to examine past performance evaluations, contract completion history, and any reported issues or successes on similar government contracts. Information on their past performance, including adherence to schedules, quality of service, and financial management, would be crucial for a thorough assessment. A review of federal procurement databases and GSA's contract performance management systems would provide more insight.

What are the potential risks associated with a sole-source award for essential facilities support?

The primary risk associated with a sole-source award for essential facilities support is the potential for inflated costs due to the absence of competition. Without competing bids, the government may not achieve the most favorable pricing. Additionally, there's a risk of complacency from the sole provider, potentially leading to a decline in service quality over time if robust performance monitoring is not in place. Another risk is vendor lock-in, making it difficult and costly to switch providers if performance issues arise or if market conditions change. Ensuring strong contract management, clear performance metrics, and regular price reviews are critical to mitigate these risks.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 633 3RD AVE 6TH FL, NEW YORK, NY, 10017

Business Categories: AbilityOne Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $49,708,454

Exercised Options: $30,668,135

Current Obligation: $30,668,135

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 13

Total Subaward Amount: $4,406,419

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PC0722A0005

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline