GSA awards $3.6M construction management contract for Calais Ferry Point project to Amentum Technology

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,579,136 ($3.6M)

Contractor: Amentum Technology, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2023-09-14

End Date: 2027-06-30

Contract Duration: 1,385 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: THIS AWARD IS FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AS AGENT (CMA) AND COMMISSIONING AUTHORITY (CXA) SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF THE CALAIS FERRY POINT LPOE PROJECT.

Place of Performance

Location: TULLAHOMA, COFFEE County, TENNESSEE, 37388

State: Tennessee Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $3.6 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC. for work described as: THIS AWARD IS FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AS AGENT (CMA) AND COMMISSIONING AUTHORITY (CXA) SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF THE CALAIS FERRY POINT LPOE PROJECT. Key points: 1. Contract awarded under a BPA Call, indicating a pre-negotiated agreement for services. 2. The contract is for Construction Manager as Agent (CMA) and Commissioning Authority (CXA) services. 3. Services are for the Calais Ferry Point project, managed by the General Services Administration (GSA). 4. The contract duration is 1385 days, ending June 30, 2027. 5. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, providing cost certainty. 6. Amentum Technology, Inc. is the selected contractor. 7. The award was made under full and open competition. 8. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 541330 for Engineering Services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $3.6 million for CMA and CXA services over approximately 3.8 years appears reasonable for a federal construction management project of this nature. Benchmarking against similar GSA projects for ferry terminal or port infrastructure would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure helps control costs, but the total cost will depend on the project's final scope and execution. Without detailed cost breakdowns or comparisons to other bids, a definitive value assessment is challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. The presence of 5 bids indicates a moderate level of competition for these specialized services. A higher number of bidders typically leads to more competitive pricing and a wider selection of qualified contractors. The specific details of the bidding process and the evaluation criteria used would further illuminate the effectiveness of the competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by driving down prices and ensuring the government receives the best value through a robust selection process.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the General Services Administration and potentially the Department of Homeland Security or other agencies utilizing the Calais Ferry Point. The services delivered include construction management and commissioning authority, crucial for the successful execution and operational readiness of the ferry point. The geographic impact is localized to the Calais Ferry Point, likely in Maine, given the context of ferry operations. The contract supports specialized engineering and construction management roles, potentially impacting the workforce in these fields.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, specifically related to construction management and commissioning for infrastructure projects. The federal government, through agencies like GSA, is a significant client for these services, particularly for high-value, complex projects such as port facilities. Market size for federal construction management services is substantial, driven by ongoing infrastructure modernization and new construction needs across various agencies. This award represents a specific instance of federal investment in critical infrastructure.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the contractor, Amentum Technology, Inc., is likely a large business. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses within this award. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities exist and if they are being utilized to engage the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) Public Buildings Service is responsible for overseeing this contract. Oversight mechanisms would typically include regular progress reports, site inspections, and performance reviews. Accountability is ensured through the firm fixed-price contract terms and the potential for contract modifications or termination for non-performance. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific performance details may be internal.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

construction, engineering-services, general-services-administration, bpa-call, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, calais-ferry-point, amentum-technology-inc, infrastructure, port-facility, commissioning-authority, construction-management

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $3.6 million to AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC.. THIS AWARD IS FOR CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AS AGENT (CMA) AND COMMISSIONING AUTHORITY (CXA) SERVICES IN SUPPORT OF THE CALAIS FERRY POINT LPOE PROJECT.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AMENTUM TECHNOLOGY, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Public Buildings Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-09-14. End: 2027-06-30.

What is Amentum Technology, Inc.'s track record with the GSA on similar construction management projects?

Amentum Technology, Inc. has a history of performing various services for the federal government, including engineering and technical support. To assess their specific track record with GSA on similar construction management projects, one would need to analyze past contract awards, performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any documented issues or successes. Without direct access to GSA's internal performance data for Amentum on comparable projects, it's difficult to provide a detailed assessment. However, their selection for this BPA Call suggests they met GSA's pre-qualification criteria and demonstrated capability in relevant areas.

How does the $3.6 million contract value compare to similar construction management contracts for ferry points or port facilities?

The $3.6 million contract value for Construction Manager as Agent (CMA) and Commissioning Authority (CXA) services for the Calais Ferry Point project needs to be benchmarked against similar federal or large-scale infrastructure projects. Factors influencing cost include project complexity, size, duration, and geographic location. A contract of this value over approximately 3.8 years suggests a moderate scale of services. To provide a precise comparison, data on other ferry terminal or port construction management contracts awarded by GSA or other agencies like the Army Corps of Engineers would be necessary. Such data would reveal if this award represents a competitive price point or if it is on the higher or lower end for comparable services.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Primary risks for this contract include potential scope creep leading to cost increases, delays in project schedule impacting operational readiness, and performance issues from the contractor (Amentum Technology, Inc.). Mitigation strategies are embedded within the contract structure. The Firm Fixed Price (FFP) nature of the award helps control costs, assuming the scope is well-defined. The contract duration (1385 days) allows for phased execution and oversight. GSA's standard oversight mechanisms, including progress monitoring, site inspections, and performance reviews, are crucial for identifying and addressing risks proactively. Clear communication channels and defined deliverables also contribute to risk mitigation.

How effective is the 'full and open competition' approach likely to be in ensuring value for taxpayer money on this contract?

The 'full and open competition' approach is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring value for taxpayer money, as it allows all responsible sources to submit bids. With 5 bids received, there was a degree of competition, which typically drives down prices and encourages contractors to offer their best value proposition. The effectiveness hinges on the clarity of the solicitation requirements, the fairness of the evaluation process, and the actual competitiveness among the bidders. If the solicitation was well-defined and the evaluation criteria were robust, this approach increases the likelihood that the GSA secured competitive pricing and the most capable contractor for the job.

What is the historical spending pattern for CMA and CXA services by the GSA or related agencies?

Historical spending patterns for Construction Manager as Agent (CMA) and Commissioning Authority (CXA) services by the GSA and related agencies can vary significantly based on infrastructure investment cycles, agency priorities, and the types of projects undertaken. GSA, as the primary civilian real estate agency, frequently awards contracts for construction management and related services for federal buildings and facilities. Analyzing historical data would involve examining contract databases (like FPDS or SAM.gov) for similar NAICS codes (e.g., 541330) and contract types (e.g., FFP, BPA Calls) awarded by GSA over several fiscal years. This analysis would reveal trends in contract values, average durations, and the prevalence of specific service types like CMA and CXA.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesArchitectural, Engineering, and Related ServicesEngineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 5

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Pae-Parsons Global Logistics Services, LLC

Address: 600 WILLIAM NORTHERN BLVD, TULLAHOMA, TN, 37388

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,579,136

Exercised Options: $3,579,136

Current Obligation: $3,579,136

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 7

Total Subaward Amount: $553,475

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47PB0023A0001

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2023-09-14

Current End Date: 2027-06-30

Potential End Date: 2027-08-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-02-27

More Contracts from Amentum Technology, Inc.

View all Amentum Technology, Inc. federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending