VA awards $58M contract for HVAC upgrades, highlighting need for facility modernization

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $58,092,738 ($58.1M)

Contractor: ESA South, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs

Start Date: 2022-10-10

End Date: 2028-01-26

Contract Duration: 1,934 days

Daily Burn Rate: $30.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: REPLACE AIR HANDING UNIT NO. 2 AND 3

Place of Performance

Location: GAINESVILLE, ALACHUA County, FLORIDA, 32608

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Veterans Affairs obligated $58.1 million to ESA SOUTH, INC. for work described as: REPLACE AIR HANDING UNIT NO. 2 AND 3 Key points: 1. Contract addresses critical infrastructure needs at a VA facility. 2. The award was made under full and open competition. 3. The contract duration extends over several years, indicating a phased approach to upgrades. 4. The fixed-price nature of the contract provides cost certainty. 5. The contractor, ESA SOUTH, INC., has experience in construction services. 6. This spending supports the maintenance and improvement of essential government facilities.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $58.1 million for HVAC upgrades appears reasonable given the scope of replacing two major units and the multi-year duration. Benchmarking against similar large-scale HVAC replacement projects in institutional settings would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, the fixed-price contract structure suggests a degree of cost control and risk transfer to the contractor. The absence of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes a detailed assessment of efficiency challenging, but the project's necessity for facility operation is clear.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' indicating that while the competition was broad, certain sources may have been excluded prior to the final award. This suggests a competitive process was initiated, but the specifics of the exclusion criteria are not detailed. The presence of two bids (no: 2) is relatively low for a contract of this magnitude, which could potentially limit price discovery and optimal value. Further information on the bidding process and the rationale for excluding sources would be beneficial.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive process, even with exclusions, is generally favorable for taxpayers as it aims to secure the best possible price. However, the limited number of bidders warrants scrutiny to ensure that the final price reflects true market value and that taxpayer funds are used efficiently.

Public Impact

Veterans receiving care at the affected VA facility will benefit from improved environmental conditions. The contract ensures the continued operational capacity of critical healthcare infrastructure. The project is geographically focused within Florida, supporting the local economy through construction activities. The successful completion of this project will support jobs in the construction sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a vital part of the broader construction industry. This sector encompasses a wide range of projects, from new builds to major renovations of public and private facilities. Spending on infrastructure upgrades like HVAC systems is crucial for maintaining the operational integrity and efficiency of government buildings, particularly those serving public needs like healthcare. Comparable spending benchmarks for large-scale HVAC replacements in federal facilities would typically range from tens to hundreds of millions of dollars, depending on the size and complexity of the building.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate any specific small business set-aside or subcontracting requirements for this contract (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary focus of this large contract is likely on larger, established construction firms capable of handling complex infrastructure projects. While this contract may not directly benefit small businesses through set-asides, the prime contractor could potentially engage small businesses as subcontractors for specialized services, though this is not explicitly detailed.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Veterans Affairs' contracting officer and program management teams. The contract's fixed-price nature provides a degree of accountability by shifting cost overrun risks to the contractor. Transparency is facilitated through public contract databases where award details are published. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract is suspected or reported.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

construction, department-of-veterans-affairs, florida, definitive-contract, large-contract, full-and-open-competition, firm-fixed-price, hvac, facility-maintenance, infrastructure

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Veterans Affairs awarded $58.1 million to ESA SOUTH, INC.. REPLACE AIR HANDING UNIT NO. 2 AND 3

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ESA SOUTH, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Veterans Affairs (Department of Veterans Affairs).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $58.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-10-10. End: 2028-01-26.

What is the track record of ESA SOUTH, INC. with the Department of Veterans Affairs and similar federal agencies?

A review of federal procurement data indicates that ESA SOUTH, INC. has been awarded multiple contracts across various federal agencies, including the Department of Veterans Affairs. Their contract history suggests experience in construction, renovation, and facility maintenance services. Specific to the VA, they have likely undertaken projects related to building infrastructure. To fully assess their track record for this specific HVAC upgrade, a deeper dive into their past performance on similar-sized projects, their on-time and on-budget completion rates, and any past performance issues or commendations would be necessary. This would provide context on their capability to successfully execute this $58 million contract.

How does the awarded price of $58.1 million compare to similar HVAC upgrade projects at other federal facilities?

Benchmarking this $58.1 million contract against similar HVAC upgrade projects at other federal facilities requires access to detailed cost data for comparable projects. Factors such as the size and age of the facility, the specific HVAC systems being replaced (e.g., chillers, boilers, air handlers), the complexity of the installation (e.g., accessibility, structural modifications), and the prevailing market rates for labor and materials in the project's geographic location (Florida) significantly influence costs. Without specific comparable project data, it's difficult to definitively state if this price is high or low. However, for replacing two major HVAC units in a large institutional building, a multi-million dollar expenditure is expected, and the fixed-price nature aims to control these costs.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Key risks for this contract include potential cost overruns due to unforeseen site conditions or material price escalations (though mitigated by the fixed-price structure), delays in project completion impacting facility operations, and contractor performance issues. The fixed-price contract shifts significant financial risk to ESA SOUTH, INC. Mitigation strategies likely involve detailed project planning, phased execution, clear performance milestones, and robust government oversight. The multi-year duration also allows for a more manageable implementation schedule. The VA's contracting officers would have established procedures for risk management, including contingency planning and performance monitoring.

What is the expected impact of these HVAC upgrades on the VA facility's operational efficiency and energy consumption?

Modernizing HVAC systems, especially replacing aging units like 'REPLACE AIR HANDLING UNIT NO. 2 AND 3,' is typically driven by the need to improve operational efficiency and reduce energy consumption. Newer systems are generally more energy-efficient, leading to lower utility costs for the facility over their lifespan. They also tend to be more reliable, reducing the frequency of breakdowns and associated repair costs, thereby enhancing operational continuity. While the exact energy savings and efficiency gains are not quantified in the award data, the investment suggests an expectation of significant improvements in both areas, contributing to the VA's sustainability goals and reducing the facility's environmental footprint.

How has federal spending on construction and facility maintenance for the VA trended over the past five years?

Federal spending on construction and facility maintenance for the Department of Veterans Affairs has generally trended upwards over the past five years, driven by an aging infrastructure, increasing healthcare demands, and a recognized need for modernization. The VA manages a vast portfolio of facilities, and significant investments are required annually to maintain, repair, and upgrade these assets. This $58 million contract for HVAC upgrades is indicative of this broader trend of investment in facility infrastructure. Congressional appropriations and specific funding bills for VA capital projects provide the overall budget, which is then allocated to various construction and maintenance initiatives across the country.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ConstructionNonresidential Building ConstructionCommercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIESCONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: 36C24822R0103

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1681 SUCCESS DR, CANTONMENT, FL, 32533

Business Categories: Category Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $58,257,307

Exercised Options: $58,257,307

Current Obligation: $58,092,738

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2022-10-10

Current End Date: 2028-01-26

Potential End Date: 2028-01-26 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-08

More Contracts from ESA South, Inc.

View all ESA South, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Veterans Affairs Contracts

View all Department of Veterans Affairs contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending