Leidos, Inc. awarded $40M BPA Call for Integrated Source Management Portfolio Support by NRC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $40,026,643 ($40.0M)

Contractor: Leidos, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Start Date: 2020-09-22

End Date: 2026-09-21

Contract Duration: 2,190 days

Daily Burn Rate: $18.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: GLINDA BPA CALL FOR INTEGRATED SOURCE MANAGEMENT PORTFOLIO (ISMP) SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20555

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Nuclear Regulatory Commission obligated $40.0 million to LEIDOS, INC. for work described as: GLINDA BPA CALL FOR INTEGRATED SOURCE MANAGEMENT PORTFOLIO (ISMP) SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in IT support services for the NRC. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Fixed-price contract type helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the government. 4. The duration of the contract (5 years) indicates a long-term need for these services. 5. The specific NAICS code (541511) points to custom computer programming services, a critical area for agency operations. 6. The award to a single contractor, Leidos, Inc., warrants scrutiny for potential future competition.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $40 million over five years for custom computer programming services appears reasonable given the scope. Benchmarking against similar IT support contracts for federal agencies of comparable size and mission complexity would provide further context. The firm-fixed-price structure is generally favorable for managing costs, assuming the scope of work is well-defined and stable. Without specific details on the services delivered, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging, but the competitive award suggests a degree of price validation.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The number of bidders is not specified, but the competitive nature of the award process is a positive sign for price discovery and potentially achieving a fair market price. This approach generally leads to better value for the government compared to sole-source or limited competition scenarios.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by fostering a market-driven price. It reduces the risk of overpayment that can occur when competition is limited.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), which will receive integrated source management portfolio support. The services delivered are expected to enhance the NRC's operational efficiency and data management capabilities. The geographic impact is primarily within the District of Columbia, where the NRC is headquartered. The contract supports the IT workforce within the NRC and potentially its contractors, ensuring the availability of specialized programming skills.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Information Technology (IT) sector, specifically custom computer programming services. The federal IT services market is substantial, with agencies consistently investing in software development, system integration, and IT support to modernize operations and enhance cybersecurity. This contract for Integrated Source Management Portfolio (ISMP) support aligns with the broader trend of agencies seeking to improve data management and operational efficiency through specialized IT solutions. Comparable spending benchmarks for custom programming services can vary widely based on complexity and duration, but a $40 million, five-year contract is a significant award.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). As a result, large businesses like Leidos, Inc. are the primary awardees. This means that opportunities for small businesses would likely be through subcontracting if Leidos chooses to engage them. The absence of a small business set-aside means direct prime contracting opportunities for small businesses were not prioritized for this specific award, potentially limiting their direct participation in this particular contract.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily reside with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's contracting officers and program managers. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of cost control. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards, allowing for general oversight. Specific performance metrics and reporting requirements would be detailed within the contract's statement of work. The Inspector General for the NRC would have jurisdiction to investigate any potential fraud, waste, or abuse related to this contract.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

it, custom-computer-programming-services, nuclear-regulatory-commission, bpa-call, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, leidos-inc, district-of-columbia, information-technology, portfolio-management, source-management

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Nuclear Regulatory Commission awarded $40.0 million to LEIDOS, INC.. GLINDA BPA CALL FOR INTEGRATED SOURCE MANAGEMENT PORTFOLIO (ISMP) SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LEIDOS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Nuclear Regulatory Commission).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $40.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2020-09-22. End: 2026-09-21.

What is the specific nature of the 'Integrated Source Management Portfolio (ISMP) Support' being provided under this contract?

The 'Integrated Source Management Portfolio (ISMP) Support' likely refers to services aimed at managing and optimizing the NRC's various sources of information, data, and potentially vendor relationships. This could encompass developing or maintaining software systems for tracking regulatory data, managing licensing processes, or overseeing compliance information. The 'portfolio' aspect suggests a comprehensive approach to managing these diverse sources as a cohesive unit. The custom computer programming services (NAICS 541511) indicate that significant software development, modification, or integration is involved in creating or enhancing these management systems to meet the NRC's specific needs for source management.

How does the $40 million contract value compare to historical NRC spending on similar IT support services?

To accurately compare, one would need to analyze historical NRC spending data for contracts with similar NAICS codes (e.g., 541511) and service descriptions (e.g., IT support, software development, portfolio management) over the past several fiscal years. The current award of approximately $40 million over five years ($8 million annually on average) should be benchmarked against the agency's typical annual IT expenditures and the average cost of comparable custom programming services. If the NRC has previously awarded multiple smaller contracts for similar functions, this consolidated BPA Call might represent a strategic shift towards centralized management. Conversely, if similar large-scale contracts have been common, this award may be within the expected spending range.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate Leidos, Inc.'s performance under this contract?

Specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) are typically detailed within the contract's Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS). For a contract focused on custom computer programming and portfolio management, common KPIs might include software defect rates, system uptime and availability, on-time delivery of project milestones, adherence to budget for specific development tasks, user satisfaction ratings, and the successful integration of new system components. The firm-fixed-price nature suggests that meeting defined deliverables and quality standards within the agreed price is paramount. The NRC's program office would be responsible for monitoring these metrics and ensuring Leidos meets the contractual obligations.

What is Leidos, Inc.'s track record with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and other federal agencies for similar IT services?

Leidos, Inc. is a major federal contractor with a substantial history of providing IT and technical services across numerous government agencies, including the Department of Defense, Health and Human Services, and Energy. Their track record with the NRC specifically would need to be examined through contract databases (like FPDS or SAM.gov) to identify previous awards, performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any significant issues. Generally, Leidos is known for its large-scale IT solutions and systems integration capabilities. A review of their past performance on similar custom programming and portfolio management contracts would indicate their experience level and reliability in delivering complex IT solutions for regulatory bodies.

Are there any identified risks associated with this contract, such as scope creep, vendor lock-in, or performance issues?

Potential risks include scope creep, where the requirements of the ISMP support might expand beyond the initial agreement, potentially leading to cost increases if not managed carefully (though less likely with FFP). Vendor lock-in is a risk if the developed systems are highly proprietary and difficult for other vendors to take over. Performance issues could arise if Leidos fails to meet the defined technical requirements or delivery timelines. Given the firm-fixed-price structure and the competitive award, the NRC has likely attempted to mitigate these risks through a well-defined SOW and performance monitoring. However, ongoing vigilance by the contracting officer and program team is crucial to manage these potential risks throughout the contract's life.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesCustom Computer Programming Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 31310020Q0071

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Leidos Holdings, Inc.

Address: 9737 WASHINGTONIAN BLVD, GAITHERSBURG, MD, 20878

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $48,888,342

Exercised Options: $40,026,643

Current Obligation: $40,026,643

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 26

Total Subaward Amount: $4,425,981

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: NRCHQ1017A0007

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2020-09-22

Current End Date: 2026-09-21

Potential End Date: 2027-09-21 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-09

More Contracts from Leidos, Inc.

View all Leidos, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Nuclear Regulatory Commission Contracts

View all Nuclear Regulatory Commission contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending