FTC Awards $2.55M Contract to The Brattle Group for Expert Services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,550,000 ($2.5M)

Contractor: THE Brattle Group Inc

Awarding Agency: Federal Trade Commission

Start Date: 2025-09-26

End Date: 2026-09-25

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.0K/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: EXPERT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20580

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Federal Trade Commission obligated $2.5 million to THE BRATTLE GROUP INC for work described as: EXPERT SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded to The Brattle Group Inc. for $2.55 million. 2. Services fall under 'Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services'. 3. Contract is for a duration of 364 days. 4. Awarded by the Federal Trade Commission. 5. Competition method was 'Competed Under SAP'.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract is a Time and Materials type, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed closely. Benchmarking against similar expert service contracts is difficult without more detailed scope information.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was 'Competed Under SAP' (Simplified Acquisition Procedures), suggesting it was likely competed among a limited number of vendors. This method may not achieve the best possible price discovery compared to full and open competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers are funding expert consulting services, the value of which depends on the necessity and effectiveness of the services provided.

Public Impact

Federal agency utilizes external expertise for specialized consulting needs. Contract duration of nearly a year indicates ongoing support requirements. The specific nature of 'expert services' impacts public understanding of the spending.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 70 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically technical consulting. Spending in this area can vary widely based on agency needs for specialized knowledge not available internally. Benchmarks are hard to establish without specific service details.

Small Business Impact

The awardee, The Brattle Group Inc., is a large business. There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this specific procurement.

Oversight & Accountability

The Federal Trade Commission is responsible for overseeing this contract. Standard oversight procedures for Time and Materials contracts should be in place to monitor costs and performance.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

other-scientific-and-technical-consultin, federal-trade-commission, dc, definitive-contract, 1m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Federal Trade Commission awarded $2.5 million to THE BRATTLE GROUP INC. EXPERT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE BRATTLE GROUP INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Federal Trade Commission (Federal Trade Commission).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-26. End: 2026-09-25.

What is the specific nature of the 'expert services' being procured, and how do they align with the FTC's mission?

The specific nature of the 'expert services' is not detailed in the provided data. These services likely relate to economic analysis, litigation support, or policy development, aligning with the FTC's mandate to protect consumers and promote competition. Understanding the precise deliverables would clarify their alignment and value.

What are the risks associated with a Time and Materials contract for expert services, and how are they mitigated?

Time and Materials contracts carry risks of cost overruns if the scope is not well-defined or if labor hours are not efficiently managed. Mitigation strategies include establishing strong oversight, setting cost ceilings, requiring detailed timesheets, and ensuring the contractor's personnel are highly productive and their rates are competitive.

How does the limited competition under SAP impact the overall effectiveness and value for taxpayer money in this contract?

Limited competition under SAP may reduce the pressure on The Brattle Group to offer the most competitive pricing compared to a full and open competition. While SAP is efficient for smaller procurements, its use here might mean the FTC did not explore the full market for potential savings or alternative expertise, potentially impacting the overall value for taxpayer money.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesOther Scientific and Technical Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Solicitation ID: FTC-1000-25-EW-0088

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1 BEACON ST, BOSTON, MA, 02108

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,876,950

Exercised Options: $2,876,950

Current Obligation: $2,550,000

Actual Outlays: $487,158

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-09-26

Current End Date: 2026-09-25

Potential End Date: 2028-09-25 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-06

More Contracts from THE Brattle Group Inc

View all THE Brattle Group Inc federal contracts →

Other Federal Trade Commission Contracts

View all Federal Trade Commission contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending