Social Security Administration awards $306,900 BPA for regional medical contractor services in Midwest/West

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $306,900 ($306.9K)

Contractor: Leong Apex S.C.

Awarding Agency: Social Security Administration

Start Date: 2025-06-27

End Date: 2026-06-30

Contract Duration: 368 days

Daily Burn Rate: $834/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE REGIONAL MEDICAL CONTRACTOR SERVICES FOR THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION IN MID-WEST/WEST REGION (CHICAGO). REVIEWS BY MEDICAL CONSULTANT OF DISABILITY CLAIM CASE FILES FOR AGENCY DISABILITY PRO

Place of Performance

Location: CHICAGO, COOK County, ILLINOIS, 60657

State: Illinois Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Social Security Administration obligated $306,900 to LEONG APEX S.C. for work described as: BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE REGIONAL MEDICAL CONTRACTOR SERVICES FOR THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION IN MID-WEST/WEST REGION (CHICAGO). REVIEWS BY MEDICAL CONSULTANT OF DISABILITY CLAIM CASE FILES FOR AGENCY DISABILITY PRO Key points: 1. Contract focuses on reviewing disability claim case files, a critical function for SSA. 2. The contract is a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) call, indicating a pre-established agreement. 3. Services are for the Midwest/West region, with a specific mention of Chicago. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 621111 points to physician services. 5. The contract duration is approximately 1.5 years, ending June 30, 2026. 6. This BPA call is not competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), suggesting a specific procurement path. 7. The firm-fixed-price contract type aims to control costs for the agency.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The award amount of $306,900 for approximately 1.5 years of service appears reasonable for specialized medical review services. However, without specific details on the volume of case files to be reviewed or the complexity of each review, a direct comparison to similar contracts is challenging. The firm-fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the Social Security Administration. Benchmarking the value would require understanding the average cost per case review compared to industry standards for disability claim evaluations.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The contract was not competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), and the procurement method is listed as 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP'. This suggests it might be a call against an existing BPA or a specific procurement strategy that bypasses standard SAP competition. Further details on the original BPA's competition or the justification for this specific call's limited competition are needed to fully assess the dynamics. The number of bidders is not specified.

Taxpayer Impact: When a contract is not fully competed, taxpayers may not benefit from the lowest possible price that could be achieved through broader market engagement. This can lead to potentially higher costs if competitive pressures are absent.

Public Impact

Benefits individuals applying for disability benefits by ensuring timely and accurate case file reviews. Services delivered include medical consultant reviews of disability claim case files. Geographic impact is focused on the Midwest/West region, specifically mentioning Chicago. Workforce implications include the need for qualified medical consultants to perform these reviews.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the healthcare services sector, specifically focusing on physician services related to disability evaluations. The NAICS code 621111 represents Offices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists). The market for medical consulting services supporting government agencies, particularly for disability claims, is specialized. Benchmarking would involve comparing the cost and efficiency of these reviews against other government contracts or private sector entities performing similar evaluations.

Small Business Impact

The contract indicates that small business participation is not a stated requirement (ss: false, sb: false). There is no explicit mention of small business set-asides or subcontracting plans. This suggests that the primary contractor, LEONG APEX S.C., may not be a small business, or if they are, subcontracting opportunities for other small businesses are not mandated under this specific award. Further analysis would be needed to determine the size status of the prime contractor and any subcontracting flow-down requirements.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Social Security Administration's contracting officers and program managers. As a firm-fixed-price contract, performance monitoring and adherence to the scope of work are key. Transparency regarding the procurement process and the justification for not competing under SAP would be subject to standard government oversight and potential Inspector General reviews if concerns arise. The specific details of performance metrics and reporting requirements would dictate the extent of accountability.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

healthcare, social-security-administration, medical-services, disability-claims, blanket-purchase-agreement, midwest, illinois, firm-fixed-price, physician-services, not-competed

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Social Security Administration awarded $306,900 to LEONG APEX S.C.. BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT FOR CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE REGIONAL MEDICAL CONTRACTOR SERVICES FOR THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION IN MID-WEST/WEST REGION (CHICAGO). REVIEWS BY MEDICAL CONSULTANT OF DISABILITY CLAIM CASE FILES FOR AGENCY DISABILITY PRO

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LEONG APEX S.C..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Social Security Administration (Social Security Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $306,900.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-06-27. End: 2026-06-30.

What is the track record of LEONG APEX S.C. with federal contracts, particularly with the Social Security Administration?

Information regarding the specific track record of LEONG APEX S.C. with federal contracts, especially with the Social Security Administration, is not detailed in the provided data. To assess their performance, one would need to consult federal procurement databases like SAM.gov or FPDS-NG for past awards, contract performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any history of disputes or terminations. A lack of readily available performance data could indicate a newer entrant or a contractor with limited federal engagement, necessitating closer scrutiny of their capabilities and capacity for this specific BPA call.

How does the estimated value of this contract compare to similar medical review contracts for disability claims?

The provided data offers an award amount of $306,900 for approximately 1.5 years of service. To benchmark this value, we would need to compare it against similar contracts for medical consultant reviews of disability claims. Key comparison points would include the number of cases reviewed, the complexity of those cases, the required turnaround time, and the qualifications of the reviewers. Without these specifics, it's difficult to definitively state if this contract represents good value. However, the firm-fixed-price nature suggests cost certainty for the SSA, which is a positive indicator for budget management.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, given its nature and procurement method?

The primary risks associated with this contract include potential issues related to the contractor's performance and capacity, especially if LEONG APEX S.C. has a limited federal track record. The procurement method, noted as 'NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP,' introduces a risk of not achieving optimal pricing due to a lack of broad competition. There's also a risk that the scope of work might be underspecified, leading to potential disputes or unmet agency needs. Ensuring the quality and consistency of medical reviews is paramount, and any lapse could impact the integrity of disability determinations.

How effective is the current approach to procuring medical review services for disability claims, and are there alternative models?

The effectiveness of the current approach, utilizing a BPA call for medical review services, depends on its ability to consistently deliver high-quality reviews in a timely manner at a reasonable cost. The fact that this is a BPA call suggests a pre-existing framework agreement, which can streamline procurement. However, the lack of explicit competition for this specific call raises questions about price discovery. Alternative models could include more robust competitive bidding for individual task orders under a broader BPA, or using different contract vehicles that encourage wider participation and potentially more competitive pricing, provided they meet the specialized needs of disability claim reviews.

What are the historical spending patterns for similar medical review services by the Social Security Administration?

Historical spending patterns for similar medical review services by the Social Security Administration are not provided in the current data. To analyze this, one would need to examine past contract awards for medical consulting services related to disability claims. This would involve looking at the total dollar amounts awarded, the number of contracts issued, the types of services procured, and the contractors involved over several fiscal years. Understanding these patterns could reveal trends in pricing, contractor utilization, and the overall investment in external medical review support.

What is the potential impact of this contract on the overall efficiency and accuracy of the SSA's disability determination process?

This contract directly supports the Social Security Administration's disability determination process by providing essential medical reviews of claim case files. The efficiency and accuracy of these reviews are critical. If LEONG APEX S.C. performs effectively, it can contribute to reducing backlogs, ensuring that claimants receive timely decisions, and maintaining the integrity of the disability program. Conversely, any performance issues, such as delays or inaccurate assessments, could negatively impact claimants and the agency's operational efficiency, potentially leading to appeals and increased administrative burden.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Health Care and Social AssistanceOffices of PhysiciansOffices of Physicians (except Mental Health Specialists)

Product/Service Code: MEDICAL SERVICESOTHER MEDICAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1446 W WOLFRAM ST, CHICAGO, IL, 60657

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $306,900

Exercised Options: $306,900

Current Obligation: $306,900

Actual Outlays: $212,553

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 28321321AC0540021

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-06-27

Current End Date: 2026-06-30

Potential End Date: 2026-06-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-10

More Contracts from Leong Apex S.C.

View all Leong Apex S.C. federal contracts →

Other Social Security Administration Contracts

View all Social Security Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending