FCC's $434K contract for payment process review awarded to Censeo Consulting Group

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $434,534 ($434.5K)

Contractor: Censeo Consulting Group, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Federal Communications Commission

Start Date: 2026-03-27

End Date: 2026-09-30

Contract Duration: 187 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: SUPPLY CHAIN REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM (SCRP) -TASK 13: FY2025 PAYMENT PROCESS REVIEW AND AUDIT.

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20006

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Federal Communications Commission obligated $434,533.9 to CENSEO CONSULTING GROUP, INC. for work described as: SUPPLY CHAIN REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM (SCRP) -TASK 13: FY2025 PAYMENT PROCESS REVIEW AND AUDIT. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on administrative management and consulting services for the Supply Chain Reimbursement Program. 2. Awarded via a BPA Call under full and open competition. 3. Duration of 187 days suggests a focused, short-term review. 4. Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty for the government. 5. The contract value is relatively small, indicating a specific, targeted audit or review. 6. Censeo Consulting Group is the sole awardee for this specific task order.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $434,534 for a 187-day period appears reasonable for a specialized administrative management and general management consulting service. Benchmarking against similar contracts for payment process reviews and audits of this scope and duration would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, given the firm fixed-price nature, the FCC has a clear understanding of the total cost.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call, which itself was likely established through a competitive process. The specific task order was competed under full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. The fact that Censeo Consulting Group was selected suggests they offered the best value among the bidders.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally leads to better price discovery and ensures that taxpayer funds are used efficiently by fostering a competitive environment among vendors.

Public Impact

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) benefits from improved oversight of its Supply Chain Reimbursement Program. Services delivered include a review and audit of the FY2025 payment process. The geographic impact is primarily within the District of Columbia, where the FCC is headquartered. Workforce implications are minimal, likely involving a small team from Censeo Consulting Group and FCC program staff.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if the review expands beyond the initial payment process.
Reliance on contractor expertise may limit internal FCC knowledge transfer.
Ensuring objective findings from the audit is crucial.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract provides budget certainty.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive award process.
BPA Call mechanism can streamline future task orders.
Short duration indicates a focused and manageable project.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically administrative and management consulting. The market for such services is robust, with numerous firms capable of conducting payment process reviews and audits. The FCC's spending on this contract is a small component of its overall operational budget and is focused on ensuring the integrity of its reimbursement programs.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not specify any small business set-aside. Therefore, it is unlikely to have direct subcontracting implications for small businesses unless Censeo Consulting Group voluntarily includes them in their team. The primary focus appears to be on securing the best expertise for the review, rather than specifically targeting small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight will likely be managed by the FCC's program office responsible for the Supply Chain Reimbursement Program, potentially with support from their contracting officer's representative (COR). Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract, requiring delivery of specified services. Transparency would be facilitated by the final audit report, though its public release may depend on sensitivity.

Related Government Programs

Supply Chain Reimbursement Program
Federal Payment Process Audits
Administrative Management Consulting

Risk Flags

Potential for audit findings to require significant corrective action.
Contract duration may be tight for a comprehensive review.
Dependence on contractor for specialized audit expertise.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Federal Communications Commission awarded $434,533.9 to CENSEO CONSULTING GROUP, INC.. SUPPLY CHAIN REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM (SCRP) -TASK 13: FY2025 PAYMENT PROCESS REVIEW AND AUDIT.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CENSEO CONSULTING GROUP, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Federal Communications Commission (Federal Communications Commission).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $434,533.9.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-03-27. End: 2026-09-30.

What is Censeo Consulting Group's track record with the Federal Communications Commission?

A review of available federal procurement data indicates that Censeo Consulting Group has received multiple awards from various federal agencies, including the FCC. While specific details on past performance with the FCC for similar services are not immediately available in this dataset, their presence as an awardee suggests they have successfully navigated the federal contracting process. Further investigation into their past performance evaluations and specific contract history with the FCC would be necessary to fully assess their track record for this particular type of engagement. This contract, valued at approximately $434,534, represents a moderate investment for the FCC, implying a level of trust or demonstrated capability.

How does the value of this contract compare to similar payment process reviews?

The contract value of $434,534 for a 187-day payment process review and audit is relatively modest in the context of federal consulting contracts. Many large-scale program audits or comprehensive management consulting engagements can run into millions of dollars and span multiple years. For a focused review of a specific program's payment process within a defined fiscal year (FY2025), this amount appears reasonable. Benchmarking against similar task orders issued by the FCC or other agencies for comparable services would provide a more precise comparison. However, the firm fixed-price structure suggests a well-defined scope, which often correlates with more predictable costs.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract?

Key risks for this contract include the potential for the scope of the review to expand beyond the initially defined payment process, leading to cost overruns or delays, although the firm fixed-price structure mitigates this. Another risk is the quality and objectivity of the audit findings; the FCC must ensure the contractor provides unbiased and actionable recommendations. There's also a risk related to knowledge transfer; if the review is purely external, the FCC may not fully internalize the lessons learned. Finally, ensuring timely delivery of the final report within the 187-day period is critical for the FCC to act on the findings.

How effective is the Federal Communications Commission's Supply Chain Reimbursement Program?

The effectiveness of the Supply Chain Reimbursement Program (SCRP) itself is not directly assessed by this contract; rather, this contract aims to review and audit the *payment process* for that program. The SCRP's overall effectiveness would depend on its objectives, such as ensuring the availability of critical supply chains, and its success in achieving those objectives. This contract focuses on the financial integrity and operational efficiency of how funds are disbursed within the SCRP. The findings from this payment process review and audit will likely inform improvements to the SCRP's financial management, potentially enhancing its overall operational effectiveness by ensuring funds are disbursed correctly and efficiently.

What are the historical spending patterns for administrative management consulting at the FCC?

Historical spending patterns for administrative management and general management consulting services at the FCC would require a broader analysis of the agency's procurement history. This specific contract represents a single task order valued at approximately $434,534. Without access to comprehensive historical data, it's difficult to establish a trend. However, agencies like the FCC often engage consulting firms for specialized reviews, audits, and strategic planning. The frequency and value of such contracts can fluctuate based on agency priorities, budget allocations, and the need for external expertise on specific initiatives like the Supply Chain Reimbursement Program.

What is the significance of awarding this contract via a BPA Call?

Awarding this contract via a BPA Call signifies an efficient procurement strategy. A Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) is a simplified method of filling anticipated repetitive needs for supplies or services. Once a BPA is established (typically through full and open competition), agencies can issue 'calls' or 'orders' against it. This streamlines the process for subsequent procurements, reducing administrative burden and lead time. For the FCC, using a BPA Call for this payment process review suggests they anticipate needing similar services in the future or have a pre-vetted list of vendors. It allows for quicker access to services from a pre-qualified contractor like Censeo Consulting Group.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1776 I ST NW STE 850, WASHINGTON, DC, 20006

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $434,534

Exercised Options: $434,534

Current Obligation: $434,534

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 273FCC24A0001

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline