Treasury's IRS awards $5.4M Unisys support contract to SAIC, raising questions about competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $5,446,530 ($5.4M)

Contractor: Science Applications International Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of the Treasury

Start Date: 2023-10-01

End Date: 2026-09-30

Contract Duration: 1,095 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.0K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: ENTERPRISE SERVICES UNISYS SUPPORT CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: KEARNEYSVILLE, JEFFERSON County, WEST VIRGINIA, 25430

State: West Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Treasury obligated $5.4 million to SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION for work described as: ENTERPRISE SERVICES UNISYS SUPPORT CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a sole-source basis, limiting price discovery and potentially increasing costs. 2. The contract duration of three years suggests a need for sustained enterprise services. 3. Focus on configuration management and enterprise services indicates critical IT infrastructure support. 4. The award to Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) warrants a review of their past performance in similar roles. 5. Lack of competition raises concerns about value for money and potential for overpayment. 6. The contract's value, while significant, is moderate within the context of large federal IT procurements.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging due to its sole-source nature and specific technical focus. Without competitive bids, it's difficult to ascertain if the $5.4 million over three years represents a fair market price for Unisys support and configuration management. Comparisons to similar sole-source IT support contracts would be necessary to provide a more robust value assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure offers some cost certainty, but the absence of competition limits the government's ability to negotiate the best possible terms.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning the IRS did not solicit bids from multiple vendors. This approach is typically used when a specific vendor possesses unique capabilities or when circumstances preclude full and open competition. The lack of competition means that taxpayers did not benefit from the potential cost savings and innovation that can arise from a competitive bidding process. It also limits the government's leverage in negotiating pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: The sole-source award means taxpayers may not have received the most cost-effective solution, as competitive pressures that drive down prices were absent.

Public Impact

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) benefits from continued support for its Unisys enterprise systems. Configuration management services ensure the stability and integrity of critical IT infrastructure. The contract supports IT operations within the Department of the Treasury. Workforce implications are likely internal to the IRS IT department and SAIC's support staff.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Computer Systems Design Services sector, a critical component of the broader IT services industry. This sector encompasses a wide range of activities, including IT consulting, systems integration, and IT support. The federal government is a major consumer of these services, with significant spending allocated to maintaining and upgrading its complex IT infrastructure. Comparable spending benchmarks for enterprise IT support contracts can vary widely based on scope, duration, and the specific technologies involved.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component, as indicated by 'sb': false. There is no information provided regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. The award to a large prime contractor like SAIC suggests that opportunities for small businesses may be limited unless they are part of SAIC's subcontracting team. Further investigation into SAIC's subcontracting practices would be needed to assess the impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of the Treasury's contracting officers and the IRS's program management. As a delivery order under an existing contract, the initial oversight was likely conducted during the parent contract's award. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature of the award. There is no specific mention of an Inspector General's direct jurisdiction over this particular award, though the Treasury OIG would have broad oversight authority over departmental spending.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

it-services, computer-systems-design, configuration-management, enterprise-support, sole-source, department-of-the-treasury, irs, firm-fixed-price, medium-value, west-virginia

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Treasury awarded $5.4 million to SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION. ENTERPRISE SERVICES UNISYS SUPPORT CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SCIENCE APPLICATIONS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Treasury (Internal Revenue Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $5.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-10-01. End: 2026-09-30.

What is the track record of Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) in providing similar enterprise support and configuration management services to federal agencies, particularly the IR

Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) is a large, established federal contractor with extensive experience in IT services, including enterprise support and configuration management. They have a history of supporting various government agencies, often involving complex IT systems. To assess their track record specifically for this contract, a review of their past performance evaluations on similar contracts would be crucial. This would involve examining CPARS (Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System) data, if available, to understand their performance history, adherence to schedules, quality of work, and customer satisfaction. For the IRS, SAIC has previously been awarded contracts related to IT modernization and support, indicating a familiarity with the agency's environment. However, the specific nature and scale of past Unisys support contracts would be the most relevant indicator of their capability for this particular award.

How does the $5.4 million contract value compare to similar enterprise support contracts awarded by the IRS or other Treasury bureaus?

Comparing the $5.4 million contract value for three years of Unisys support requires context. This equates to approximately $1.8 million per year. Without knowing the exact scope of services, the number of users supported, and the complexity of the Unisys environment, a direct comparison is difficult. However, within the federal IT services market, contracts of this size are common for specialized support functions. If this contract were competed, the number of bids and the range of proposed prices would offer valuable insights into market rates. Given its sole-source nature, it's harder to benchmark against competitive awards. A review of historical IRS IT support contracts, particularly those for enterprise systems or specific software maintenance, would be necessary to determine if this pricing is within an expected range, considering inflation and the evolution of technology.

What are the primary risks associated with awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and what mitigation strategies are in place?

The primary risk of a sole-source award is the potential for inflated pricing due to the absence of competitive pressure. This can lead to reduced value for taxpayer money. Another risk is the potential for complacency from the contractor, as there is no immediate threat of losing the business to a competitor. Furthermore, it limits the government's ability to benefit from innovative solutions that might be proposed by other vendors. Mitigation strategies typically involve rigorous negotiation of terms and pricing by the contracting officer, thorough market research to ensure the price is fair and reasonable, and robust performance management throughout the contract's life. For this specific contract, the firm-fixed-price structure provides some cost control, but the IRS would need to actively monitor SAIC's performance and costs to ensure value.

What is the expected impact of this contract on the IRS's ability to maintain and upgrade its enterprise systems, particularly those relying on Unisys technology?

This contract is directly intended to ensure the continued operational stability and support for IRS enterprise systems that utilize Unisys technology. By awarding this contract to SAIC, the IRS aims to secure the necessary expertise for configuration management, maintenance, and potentially minor upgrades or enhancements. This support is crucial for the day-to-day functioning of critical IRS operations, including tax processing and taxpayer services. The three-year duration suggests a commitment to maintaining these systems over a significant period. The effectiveness will depend on SAIC's technical proficiency with the specific Unisys environment and the IRS's ability to manage the contract effectively to ensure that system performance and reliability are maintained or improved.

Are there any historical spending patterns with SAIC or for Unisys support at the IRS that this contract continues or deviates from?

To determine historical spending patterns, one would need to analyze past contracts awarded to SAIC by the IRS, as well as previous contracts for Unisys support. If SAIC has been a long-term provider of similar services to the IRS, this contract may represent a continuation of an established relationship. The value of this contract ($5.4 million over three years) should be compared to the total amount spent on Unisys support in previous fiscal years. A significant increase or decrease could indicate a change in the scope of services, market conditions, or the government's strategy. If this is a new award to SAIC for this specific type of support, it might signal a shift in contracting strategy or a response to a change in vendor capabilities or market availability. Analyzing the 'NOT COMPETED' status historically for Unisys support at the IRS would also reveal patterns in procurement approaches.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesComputer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSIT AND TELECOM - END USER

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 12010 SUNSET HILLS ROAD, RESTON, VA, 20190

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $11,750,066

Exercised Options: $6,677,362

Current Obligation: $5,446,530

Actual Outlays: $4,836,269

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 5

Total Subaward Amount: $887,408

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 2032H523D00001

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2023-10-01

Current End Date: 2026-09-30

Potential End Date: 2028-09-30 13:44:37

Last Modified: 2026-03-12

More Contracts from Science Applications International Corporation

View all Science Applications International Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of the Treasury Contracts

View all Department of the Treasury contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending