Treasury's Mint awards $1.23M purchase order to Warner Bros. for superhero licensing

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $1,228,500 ($1.2M)

Contractor: Warner Bros. Consumer Products, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of the Treasury

Start Date: 2025-04-01

End Date: 2028-04-01

Contract Duration: 1,096 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.1K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: WARNER BROTHERS DC COMICS LICENSING AGREEMENT FOR SUPERHEROES

Place of Performance

Location: BURBANK, LOS ANGELES County, CALIFORNIA, 91522

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Treasury obligated $1.2 million to WARNER BROS. CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC. for work described as: WARNER BROTHERS DC COMICS LICENSING AGREEMENT FOR SUPERHEROES Key points: 1. Value for money is difficult to assess without competitive bidding. 2. Limited competition raises concerns about optimal pricing. 3. Contract duration of nearly three years warrants performance monitoring. 4. Sector positioning is within intellectual property licensing for consumer goods. 5. Performance context is tied to the production and sale of licensed merchandise.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The $1.23 million award for superhero licensing is a sole-source purchase order, making direct value-for-money comparisons challenging. Without a competitive process, it's difficult to benchmark pricing against market rates or determine if the government secured the most favorable terms. The fixed-price nature of the contract provides some cost certainty, but the absence of competition limits the ability to assess if the price reflects true market value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded as a sole-source purchase order, meaning no other vendors were solicited or considered. This approach bypasses the standard competitive bidding process, which typically involves multiple bidders vying for the contract. The lack of competition means there was no price discovery through market forces, potentially leading to higher costs than if multiple vendors had competed.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may not have received the best possible price due to the absence of a competitive bidding process. This sole-source award limits transparency and the opportunity for cost savings that could arise from a more open procurement.

Public Impact

The United States Mint benefits from licensing popular superhero intellectual property. This agreement enables the production and sale of commemorative coins and related merchandise. The geographic impact is national, as Mint products are sold nationwide. Workforce implications are minimal, primarily involving contract management and product development within the Mint.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader 'Other Motion Picture and Video Industries' sector, specifically focusing on intellectual property licensing for consumer products. The market for licensed entertainment merchandise is substantial, driven by popular franchises. The United States Mint's involvement suggests a strategy to leverage popular culture to drive sales of its numismatic products, potentially tapping into new collector bases.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to involve small business set-asides. As a sole-source award to a large corporation, there are no direct subcontracting opportunities for small businesses stemming from this specific agreement. The impact on the small business ecosystem is negligible.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this purchase order would typically fall under the Department of the Treasury's internal controls and the United States Mint's procurement regulations. Accountability measures are inherent in the purchase order process, requiring the contractor to deliver specified goods or services. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature of the award.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

other-motion-picture-and-video-industries, department-of-the-treasury, united-states-mint, purchase-order, sole-source, intellectual-property-licensing, entertainment, california, firm-fixed-price, large-business

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Treasury awarded $1.2 million to WARNER BROS. CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC.. WARNER BROTHERS DC COMICS LICENSING AGREEMENT FOR SUPERHEROES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is WARNER BROS. CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Treasury (United States Mint).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $1.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-04-01. End: 2028-04-01.

What is the track record of Warner Bros. Consumer Products in similar government licensing agreements?

Warner Bros. Consumer Products (WBCP) is a global leader in licensing intellectual property from Warner Bros. and its related entities. While WBCP has extensive experience in commercial licensing for a wide array of products, including toys, apparel, and collectibles, their direct engagement in government-specific licensing agreements, particularly for numismatic products like those from the U.S. Mint, is less publicly documented. Typically, government agencies seek competitive bids for such services to ensure fair market value. The absence of public information on prior government contracts for WBCP suggests this may be a novel or unique arrangement for both parties, making it harder to benchmark their performance in this specific context.

How does the $1.23 million value compare to typical U.S. Mint licensing agreements?

Direct comparisons for U.S. Mint licensing agreements are challenging as specific contract values are not always publicly disclosed, especially for sole-source awards. However, the U.S. Mint has historically engaged in licensing for commemorative coins and related merchandise. The $1.23 million figure for a nearly three-year period, covering popular superhero intellectual property, appears to be a significant investment. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to ascertain if this represents a fair market price or if a more cost-effective arrangement could have been achieved through open competition. The value is likely influenced by the brand recognition and marketability of the specific superheroes licensed.

What are the primary risks associated with this sole-source licensing agreement?

The primary risk associated with this sole-source agreement is the potential for overpayment due to the lack of competitive bidding, meaning the U.S. Mint may not have secured the most favorable pricing. Another risk is the limited transparency inherent in sole-source procurements, which can reduce public trust and accountability. Furthermore, the contract duration of nearly three years carries a risk that the market value or popularity of the licensed intellectual property could change, potentially making the agreement less advantageous over time. There's also a risk that the chosen licensor might not fully meet the Mint's expectations for product quality or market reach, although Warner Bros. is a reputable entity.

How effective is the U.S. Mint likely to be in leveraging superhero licenses for product sales?

The U.S. Mint's effectiveness in leveraging superhero licenses for product sales will depend on several factors. Their established distribution channels and reputation for quality in numismatic products provide a strong foundation. The inherent popularity and broad appeal of major superhero franchises suggest a significant potential market. However, success hinges on the Mint's ability to design and market products that resonate with both traditional coin collectors and fans of the superhero properties. Challenges may include differentiating their offerings in a crowded merchandise market and effectively reaching the target demographics. The fixed-price nature of the agreement means the Mint bears the primary financial risk and reward associated with sales performance.

What are the historical spending patterns of the U.S. Mint on intellectual property licensing?

Historical spending patterns of the U.S. Mint on intellectual property licensing are not extensively detailed in public records, particularly for specific dollar amounts tied to individual licenses. The Mint has a history of producing commemorative coins, some of which may have involved licensing for specific themes or imagery, though often these are historical or cultural in nature rather than popular entertainment franchises. This agreement with Warner Bros. for superhero licensing appears to represent a strategic shift or expansion into leveraging high-profile entertainment IP. Without more granular data on past licensing expenditures, it's difficult to establish a direct trend, but this award suggests a deliberate effort to diversify its product appeal and revenue streams through popular culture.

Industry Classification

NAICS: InformationMotion Picture and Video IndustriesOther Motion Picture and Video Industries

Product/Service Code: PHOTOGRAPHIC EQPT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4000 WARNER BLVD, BURBANK, CA, 91522

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $4,914,000

Exercised Options: $1,228,500

Current Obligation: $1,228,500

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-04-01

Current End Date: 2028-04-01

Potential End Date: 2028-04-01 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-07

Other Department of the Treasury Contracts

View all Department of the Treasury contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending