Department of State awards $2.47M contract for data integrity and GTAS reporting to The MIL Corporation

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,468,094 ($2.5M)

Contractor: THE MIL Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of State

Start Date: 2024-04-01

End Date: 2026-09-30

Contract Duration: 912 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.7K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: IT

Official Description: TASK 003 - DATA INTEGRITY AND GTAS REPORT (DMIG FOLLOW ON)

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20520

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of State obligated $2.5 million to THE MIL CORPORATION for work described as: TASK 003 - DATA INTEGRITY AND GTAS REPORT (DMIG FOLLOW ON) Key points: 1. The contract focuses on data integrity and GTAS reporting, crucial for maintaining accurate government financial data. 2. Awarded to The MIL Corporation, a company with a history of providing IT and professional services to the government. 3. The contract duration of 912 days suggests a need for sustained support in data management. 4. The use of a Time and Materials contract type allows for flexibility but requires careful monitoring of labor hours and costs. 5. This award falls under the 'Other Computer Related Services' NAICS code, indicating a specialized IT support function. 6. The contract was awarded via a BPA Call, suggesting it leverages an existing framework agreement for efficiency.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $2.47 million over approximately 2.5 years appears reasonable for specialized IT services related to data integrity and reporting. Benchmarking against similar contracts for data management and IT support within the Department of State or other agencies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The Time and Materials (T&M) pricing structure necessitates close oversight to ensure costs remain aligned with the scope of work and market labor rates.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. This competitive process is generally expected to yield fair market pricing and encourage innovation. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a robust competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it typically drives down costs through market forces and ensures the government receives the best value for its investment.

Public Impact

The Department of State benefits from improved data integrity and GTAS reporting, enhancing financial management and accountability. Citizens and oversight bodies benefit from more reliable and transparent financial data from the agency. The services delivered are critical for the operational efficiency and compliance of the Department of State's financial systems. The primary geographic impact is within the District of Columbia, where the Department of State is headquartered.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Time and Materials contract type can lead to cost overruns if not closely managed.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical data integrity functions may pose a risk if performance falters.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing.
The MIL Corporation has a track record of government contracting, implying familiarity with federal requirements.
The contract duration indicates a recognized need for ongoing support, suggesting a well-defined requirement.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the IT services sector, specifically focusing on data management and reporting. The market for such services is competitive, with numerous firms offering specialized solutions. The Department of State's spending in this area is consistent with the broader federal government's increasing reliance on robust IT infrastructure and data analytics to support its missions. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within IT support services for large federal agencies.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses arising from a set-aside provision. The prime contractor, The MIL Corporation, may engage small businesses as subcontractors, but this is not mandated by the contract's award terms.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the contracting officer and program managers within the Department of State. The Time and Materials nature of the contract requires diligent monitoring of labor hours, rates, and deliverables to ensure compliance and prevent cost overruns. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases and reporting requirements. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any issues of fraud, waste, or abuse arise.

Related Government Programs

Financial Management Systems Modernization
Governmentwide Financial Data Standards
IT Services for Federal Agencies
Data Analytics and Reporting Support

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to T&M contract type.
Need for robust oversight to ensure performance and value.
Dependence on contractor performance for critical data functions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of State awarded $2.5 million to THE MIL CORPORATION. TASK 003 - DATA INTEGRITY AND GTAS REPORT (DMIG FOLLOW ON)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE MIL CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of State (Department of State).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-04-01. End: 2026-09-30.

What is The MIL Corporation's past performance record with the Department of State and other federal agencies, particularly on similar data integrity or GTAS reporting contracts?

The MIL Corporation has a history of performing IT and professional services for various federal agencies, including the Department of State. While specific details on past performance for GTAS reporting are not provided in this summary, their general experience suggests familiarity with government contracting requirements and operational environments. A deeper dive into their contract history, including performance evaluations and any past issues or commendations, would be necessary for a comprehensive assessment. Agencies typically review past performance as a key factor in award decisions, looking for demonstrated ability to meet technical requirements, manage schedules, and control costs on similar projects.

How does the awarded value of $2.47 million compare to similar data integrity and GTAS reporting contracts awarded by the Department of State or other agencies in the last three years?

Without specific comparative contract data, it is challenging to definitively benchmark the $2.47 million award. However, for a contract spanning approximately 2.5 years (912 days) and involving specialized IT services like data integrity and GTAS reporting, this value appears within a reasonable range for a federal agency. Contracts for similar IT support services can vary significantly based on scope, duration, labor mix, and geographic location. A thorough comparison would involve analyzing contracts with similar NAICS codes (e.g., 541519) and service descriptions, considering factors like the number of labor hours estimated, the complexity of the data systems involved, and the specific reporting requirements.

What are the primary risks associated with using a Time and Materials (T&M) contract for this type of service, and what mitigation strategies are in place?

The primary risk with T&M contracts is the potential for cost overruns, as the final price is not fixed and depends on the actual labor hours and material costs incurred. This can be exacerbated if the scope of work is not clearly defined or if contractor performance is inefficient. Mitigation strategies typically include establishing strong oversight mechanisms, setting ceiling prices, requiring detailed timesheets and progress reports, and conducting regular reviews of labor rates and material costs. The Department of State's contracting officer and program managers are responsible for actively managing these risks throughout the contract's lifecycle to ensure value for money and prevent scope creep without proper authorization and funding.

How effective is the 'full and open competition' process in ensuring the Department of State receives optimal value for its investment in data integrity services?

Full and open competition is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring the government receives optimal value. By allowing all responsible sources to submit bids, it fosters a competitive environment that drives down prices, encourages innovation, and increases the likelihood of selecting a contractor with the best technical capabilities and cost-effectiveness. The Department of State's use of this method for the $2.47 million data integrity contract suggests a commitment to maximizing taxpayer value. The success of this process is further dependent on clear solicitation requirements and a fair evaluation process.

What are the potential implications of this contract on the broader IT services market, particularly for companies specializing in data management and government reporting?

This contract award to The MIL Corporation signifies continued government investment in specialized IT services for data integrity and reporting. It highlights the ongoing demand for expertise in managing and securing sensitive government data. For the broader IT services market, it reinforces the importance of capabilities in areas like data analytics, cybersecurity, and compliance reporting. Companies that can demonstrate a strong track record in these niche areas, particularly within the federal sector, are likely to find continued opportunities. The use of a BPA Call also suggests a trend towards leveraging existing contract vehicles for efficiency, which can influence how vendors approach federal contracting.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Other Computer Related Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › IT AND TELECOM - APLLICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: SAQMMA16Q0210

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4000 MITCHELLVILLE RD A21, BOWIE, MD, 20716

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,624,644

Exercised Options: $2,624,644

Current Obligation: $2,468,094

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 2

Total Subaward Amount: $1,668,781

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: SAQMMA17A0120

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline