Department of Labor awards $22.1M contract to Career Systems Development Corporation for technical training services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $22,105,359 ($22.1M)

Contractor: Career Systems Development Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Labor

Start Date: 2024-02-16

End Date: 2026-05-31

Contract Duration: 835 days

Daily Burn Rate: $26.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: SPRINGDALE JOB CORPS CONTINGENCY IDIQ - CAREER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

Place of Performance

Location: TROUTDALE, MULTNOMAH County, OREGON, 97060

State: Oregon Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Labor obligated $22.1 million to CAREER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION for work described as: SPRINGDALE JOB CORPS CONTINGENCY IDIQ - CAREER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract is a firm-fixed-price delivery order, providing cost certainty for the government. 3. The duration of the contract is 835 days, indicating a medium-term service requirement. 4. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 611519 points to specialized technical and trade school services. 5. The contract is not set aside for small businesses, implying larger firms may have participated. 6. The award was made by the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management, indicating internal operational support. 7. The contract's value is $22.1 million, which needs to be benchmarked against similar services.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $22.1 million for technical and trade school services over approximately 2.3 years appears to be within a reasonable range for specialized training programs. However, without specific details on the scope of services, the number of individuals trained, or the specific skills imparted, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. Benchmarking against similar Job Corps or workforce development contracts would provide better context for pricing and overall value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this method generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and service offerings for the government. The open competition suggests the agency sought the best value from a wide range of potential providers.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive process that aims to secure the most cost-effective and high-quality training services for workforce development programs.

Public Impact

Individuals seeking technical and trade skills development will benefit from the services provided. The contract supports workforce development initiatives, aiming to equip participants with job-ready skills. The geographic impact is likely focused on areas served by the Job Corps program, potentially in Oregon given the 'OR' state code. The workforce implications include the creation of training positions and the enhancement of the skills of the future workforce.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness of the training.
The scope of 'career systems development' is broad and could lead to variations in service delivery.
Limited information on the specific technical skills being taught requires further clarification.
The contract's duration does not provide long-term stability for program continuity beyond its end date.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust selection process.
Firm-fixed-price contract type provides budget certainty for the Department of Labor.
The contract supports a critical government function: workforce development and skills training.
The contractor, Career Systems Development Corporation, is likely experienced in providing such services.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader education and training services sector, specifically focusing on vocational and technical training. The Job Corps program, which this contract likely supports, is a significant federal initiative aimed at preparing young people for careers. The market for such services includes a variety of educational institutions, private training providers, and non-profit organizations. Benchmarking against other federal contracts for workforce development and vocational training would provide context for the scale and pricing of this award.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of specific small business subcontracting requirements in the provided data. This suggests that the primary awardee is likely a larger entity, and opportunities for small businesses would primarily depend on their ability to subcontract with Career Systems Development Corporation. The absence of a small business set-aside might limit direct opportunities for smaller specialized training providers.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Labor's contracting officers and program managers. The Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management likely has internal review processes. Transparency regarding performance metrics and outcomes would be crucial for assessing accountability. While not explicitly stated, the Inspector General's office may have jurisdiction for audits and investigations if concerns arise regarding fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Job Corps Program
Workforce Innovation and Opportunity Act (WIOA) Programs
Federal Workforce Development Contracts
Vocational Training Grants

Risk Flags

Lack of specific performance metrics.
Limited detail on the scope of services and skills taught.
No information on the number of bidders in the competitive process.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Labor awarded $22.1 million to CAREER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION. SPRINGDALE JOB CORPS CONTINGENCY IDIQ - CAREER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is CAREER SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Labor (Office of the Assistant Secretary for Administration and Management).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $22.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-02-16. End: 2026-05-31.

What specific technical and trade skills are covered under this contract, and how are they aligned with current labor market demands?

The provided data indicates the contract falls under NAICS code 611519 (Other Technical and Trade Schools), suggesting a broad range of vocational training. However, the specific skills are not detailed. To assess alignment with labor market demands, one would need to examine the Statement of Work (SOW) for details on curriculum, target industries, and any labor market analysis conducted by the Department of Labor or the contractor. Federal workforce development programs typically aim to train individuals in high-demand fields such as healthcare, advanced manufacturing, information technology, and skilled trades. A review of the contractor's past performance and the specific objectives of the Job Corps center(s) this contract serves would offer further insight into the skill sets being developed.

How does the $22.1 million contract value compare to similar technical training contracts awarded by the Department of Labor or other federal agencies?

Benchmarking the $22.1 million contract value requires comparing it to similar firm-fixed-price delivery orders for technical and trade school services, particularly those supporting workforce development or Job Corps initiatives. Factors such as the number of trainees, the duration of training programs, the complexity of skills taught, and geographic location significantly influence contract costs. For instance, a contract focused on highly specialized, long-term technical certifications might command a higher per-trainee cost than a shorter-term vocational program. Without access to a database of comparable contracts with detailed scope and pricing, a precise comparison is difficult. However, $22.1 million over approximately 2.3 years suggests a substantial program, likely serving a significant number of participants or offering comprehensive training modules.

What is the track record of Career Systems Development Corporation in delivering federal workforce development or training contracts?

Assessing the track record of Career Systems Development Corporation (CSDC) is crucial for understanding their capability to fulfill this $22.1 million contract. Information regarding CSDC's past performance, including previous federal contracts, their values, durations, and performance ratings, would be essential. Agencies typically evaluate past performance as a key factor in award decisions. A review of CSDC's contract history with the Department of Labor or other agencies could reveal their experience with similar training programs, their ability to meet deadlines and quality standards, and any history of performance issues or disputes. Publicly available contract databases and performance information systems could provide insights into their reliability and effectiveness as a contractor.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how will the success of the training program be measured?

The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract. Typically, for workforce development and training contracts, success is measured by metrics such as trainee completion rates, job placement rates post-training, starting wages of placed individuals, employer satisfaction with trained individuals, and the attainment of specific certifications or skills. The Statement of Work (SOW) would detail these KPIs and the methods for tracking and reporting performance. The Department of Labor would monitor these metrics to ensure the contractor is delivering effective training that meets program objectives and provides value to both the participants and the taxpayer.

What is the historical spending pattern for similar technical and trade school services by the Department of Labor?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for similar technical and trade school services by the Department of Labor (DOL) would provide context for the $22.1 million award. This involves examining past contract awards for workforce development, vocational training, and Job Corps support over several fiscal years. Key data points to look for include the average contract value, the number of contracts awarded annually, the types of services procured (e.g., specific trades, general career readiness), and the primary contractors. Significant fluctuations or consistent high spending in this category could indicate the importance DOL places on these services. Understanding historical trends helps in evaluating whether the current contract represents a typical investment or a notable increase/decrease in federal spending on such training.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Educational Services › Technical and Trade Schools › Other Technical and Trade Schools

Product/Service Code: EDUCATION AND TRAINING › EDUCATION AND TRAINING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: 1605JW-24-Q-00001

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 75 THRUWAY PARK DR STE 100, WEST HENRIETTA, NY, 14586

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $26,721,423

Exercised Options: $26,536,423

Current Obligation: $22,105,359

Actual Outlays: $18,890,622

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 1605JE22D0012

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline