DOJ awards $22.5M for office furniture, with KRUEGER INTERNATIONAL, INC. as the sole awardee

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $22,564 ($22.6K)

Contractor: Krueger International, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2026-04-06

End Date: 2026-04-27

Contract Duration: 21 days

Daily Burn Rate: $1.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: SYSTEMS COMPONENTS LAC CONTRACT

Place of Performance

Location: GREEN BAY, BROWN County, WISCONSIN, 54302

State: Wisconsin Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $22,564.09 to KRUEGER INTERNATIONAL, INC. for work described as: SYSTEMS COMPONENTS LAC CONTRACT Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair given the firm fixed price contract type. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open competition, suggesting potential for competitive pricing. 3. Risk indicators are low due to the short duration and fixed price nature. 4. Performance context is within the scope of standard office furniture procurement. 5. Sector positioning is within the manufacturing and office supply sector for government agencies.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $22.5 million for office furniture over a 21-day period seems within a reasonable range for a large federal order. Benchmarking against similar large-scale furniture procurements would provide a more precise value assessment. The firm fixed price structure helps control costs for the government, but the specific unit prices are not detailed here.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The number of bidders is not specified, but this method generally promotes competitive pricing and allows the government to select the best value. The open competition suggests that the government sought a broad range of options and pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it typically leads to more competitive pricing and a wider selection of quality products, ensuring the government receives good value for its investment.

Public Impact

The Department of Justice benefits from this contract by acquiring necessary office furniture. Services delivered include the manufacturing and delivery of wood office furniture. The geographic impact is likely concentrated where the furniture is delivered and installed, potentially nationwide for DOJ facilities. Workforce implications include jobs in manufacturing, logistics, and installation, primarily associated with the contractor and its supply chain.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for price increases in future orders if competition is not sustained.
Dependence on a single contractor for a large volume of furniture could lead to supply chain risks.
Quality control and timely delivery are critical given the short performance period.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed price contract limits cost overruns for the government.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive market for this type of product.
Award to a known entity (KRUEGER INTERNATIONAL, INC.) may indicate a track record of performance.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader furniture manufacturing sector, specifically focusing on wood office furniture for government use. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 337211 indicates wood office furniture manufacturing. Government procurement of office furniture is a significant market, with agencies regularly updating and furnishing facilities. Benchmarks for similar large-scale furniture contracts would typically consider volume, customization, and delivery timelines.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). While KRUEGER INTERNATIONAL, INC. may be a large business, there is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses are involved in the supply chain or as subcontractors for this order.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the relevant program officials within the Department of Justice. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm fixed price contract terms, requiring delivery of specified goods. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards, allowing for review of basic contract details.

Related Government Programs

General Services Administration (GSA) Federal Supply Schedule contracts for furniture
Department of Defense office furniture procurements
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) guidance on federal asset management

Risk Flags

Short performance period may increase costs or risk delivery delays.
Lack of specific unit pricing makes detailed value-for-money assessment difficult.
No explicit information on small business subcontracting.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $22,564.09 to KRUEGER INTERNATIONAL, INC.. SYSTEMS COMPONENTS LAC CONTRACT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is KRUEGER INTERNATIONAL, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Prison Industries / Unicor).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $22,564.09.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-06. End: 2026-04-27.

What is the historical spending pattern for office furniture by the Department of Justice?

Analyzing historical spending data for office furniture by the Department of Justice (DOJ) is crucial for understanding trends, identifying potential cost savings, and assessing the consistency of procurement strategies. Without specific historical data for the DOJ's furniture purchases, a general observation can be made that federal agencies regularly procure office furniture to furnish new facilities, replace aging stock, and accommodate changes in workforce size or office layouts. This spending can fluctuate based on agency budgets, infrastructure projects, and modernization initiatives. Comparing the current $22.5 million award to previous years' expenditures would reveal whether this represents an increase, decrease, or a typical level of investment. Furthermore, examining past contract awards for furniture could highlight trends in competition, pricing, and the types of furniture most frequently purchased, providing valuable context for the current award's value and terms.

How does the price per unit for this furniture compare to market rates or similar government contracts?

A detailed comparison of the price per unit for the furniture awarded under this contract against market rates and similar government contracts is essential for a robust value assessment. However, the provided data does not include specific unit pricing for individual furniture items. To conduct such a comparison, one would need to identify the types and quantities of furniture included in the $22.5 million award and then research average selling prices from commercial vendors and pricing data from other federal contracts, such as those awarded through GSA Schedules or other competitive solicitations. Factors like bulk discounts, customization, delivery, and installation costs significantly influence the final price. Without this granular data, it is difficult to definitively state whether the pricing is competitive or represents excellent value for taxpayers.

What is the track record of KRUEGER INTERNATIONAL, INC. in fulfilling federal contracts, particularly for furniture?

Assessing the track record of KRUEGER INTERNATIONAL, INC. is vital for understanding the potential performance risks and reliability associated with this $22.5 million contract. A review of past federal contract awards to KRUEGER INTERNATIONAL, INC. would reveal their history of on-time delivery, product quality, and adherence to contract terms. Information on past performance evaluations, any disputes, or contract terminations would provide further insight. If the company has a history of successful, timely, and high-quality furniture deliveries to government agencies, it suggests a lower risk profile for this current award. Conversely, any past performance issues would warrant closer scrutiny of oversight and performance monitoring for this specific contract to mitigate potential problems.

What are the specific types and quantities of wood office furniture being procured?

The provided data specifies that the contract is for 'Wood Office Furniture Manufacturing' under NAICS code 337211, and the total award amount is $22,564,090. However, it does not detail the specific types of furniture (e.g., desks, chairs, filing cabinets, conference tables) or the quantities of each item being procured. This level of detail is typically found in the contract's statement of work or delivery order details. Understanding the specific items and quantities is crucial for accurately assessing the value for money, comparing pricing to benchmarks, and evaluating the overall necessity and scope of the procurement. Without this information, the analysis remains at a high level, focusing on the general category of wood office furniture.

How does the short performance period (21 days) impact the feasibility and cost of this furniture delivery?

The 21-day performance period for this $22.5 million office furniture contract is exceptionally short and presents significant implications for both feasibility and cost. Such a tight timeframe suggests either a need for immediate deployment of furniture, perhaps for a rapidly established facility or an urgent replacement scenario, or that the contract may cover only a portion of a larger furniture requirement. From a cost perspective, expedited manufacturing, logistics, and installation often incur premium charges. Contractors may need to allocate additional resources, potentially including overtime labor and expedited shipping, to meet such a deadline, which could be factored into the pricing. For the government, a short performance period necessitates efficient internal processes for order placement, inspection, and acceptance to avoid delays that could negate the urgency. It also implies a need for robust project management to ensure all aspects are coordinated within the limited window.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Office Furniture (including Fixtures) Manufacturing › Wood Office Furniture Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: FURNITURE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: FN1507-21

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1330 BELLEVUE ST, GREEN BAY, WI, 54302

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $22,564

Exercised Options: $22,564

Current Obligation: $22,564

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15UC0C21D00001172

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline