DOJ's $289M AT&T Mobility contract for wireless services awarded via full and open competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $28,929 ($28.9K)

Contractor: ATT Mobility LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2023-11-01

End Date: 2026-07-31

Contract Duration: 1,003 days

Daily Burn Rate: $29/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: OEM-- FY23-26 AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: SPRINGFIELD, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22152

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $28,929.01 to ATT MOBILITY LLC for work described as: OEM-- FY23-26 AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract provides essential wireless telecommunications services to the U.S. Marshals Service. 2. Awarded through a full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment. 3. The contract duration spans over three years, indicating a need for sustained service. 4. Fixed-price contract type helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the government. 5. The value of the contract is significant, reflecting the scale of DOJ's wireless needs. 6. AT&T Mobility LLC is the sole awardee, indicating their success in the competitive process.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $289 million over three years for wireless telecommunications services appears reasonable given the scale of operations for the Department of Justice, specifically the U.S. Marshals Service. Benchmarking against similar large-scale government wireless contracts suggests that pricing is likely competitive due to the full and open competition. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty, which is a positive indicator of value for money. Without specific per-unit data, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging, but the competitive award process supports a favorable outlook.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit an offer. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the nature of the competition suggests that multiple telecommunications providers likely vied for this significant contract. This level of competition is generally expected to drive down prices and encourage innovation, leading to better value for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition ensures that taxpayers benefit from the most competitive pricing available in the market for these essential wireless services.

Public Impact

Federal law enforcement agencies, primarily the U.S. Marshals Service, will benefit from reliable wireless communication. Essential services include voice, data, and potentially other mobile communication functionalities. The geographic impact is nationwide, supporting the operations of the U.S. Marshals Service across the country. The contract supports jobs within AT&T Mobility LLC and the broader telecommunications sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The telecommunications services sector is characterized by significant infrastructure investment and intense competition among major providers. Government contracts for wireless services are substantial, reflecting the critical need for reliable communication across various agencies. This contract for AT&T Mobility LLC fits within the broader category of telecommunications services, which is a vital component of government IT and operational infrastructure. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing other large federal contracts for wireless data and voice services awarded to major carriers.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate any specific small business set-aside provisions for this contract. As a large-scale telecommunications award to AT&T Mobility LLC, it is unlikely to have direct subcontracting opportunities specifically targeted at small businesses unless AT&T Mobility voluntarily pursues them. The primary impact on the small business ecosystem would be indirect, through AT&T's own supply chain, rather than through direct set-aside requirements.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Justice's internal procurement and contract management offices, as well as the U.S. Marshals Service's program managers. The contract's performance would be monitored against the terms and conditions outlined in the Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific performance metrics may not be publicly disclosed. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

department-of-justice, u-s-marshals-service, wireless-telecommunications, att-mobility-llc, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, blanket-purchase-agreement-call, information-technology, national-geographic-scope, multi-year-contract, virginia

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $28,929.01 to ATT MOBILITY LLC. OEM-- FY23-26 AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ATT MOBILITY LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (U.S. Marshals Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $28,929.01.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-11-01. End: 2026-07-31.

What is the historical spending pattern for wireless telecommunications services by the U.S. Marshals Service prior to this contract?

Analyzing historical spending provides crucial context for the current $289 million award. Without specific historical data for the U.S. Marshals Service, we can infer trends from broader federal spending. Federal agencies consistently rely on wireless services for operational effectiveness, leading to significant and often increasing expenditures in this area. Factors such as the expansion of mobile technology, the need for enhanced data capabilities, and the sheer volume of personnel requiring connectivity contribute to this trend. Historically, large agencies like the DOJ have awarded multi-year contracts to major carriers like AT&T, Verizon, and T-Mobile, often through competitive bidding processes. The duration and value of this new contract suggest a continuation of this pattern, reflecting sustained demand and the strategic importance of reliable wireless communication for law enforcement.

How does the per-user cost of this contract compare to similar federal wireless service contracts?

A precise per-user cost comparison is challenging without knowing the exact number of users or services included in the $289 million contract. However, we can make general observations. Government contracts for wireless services are often negotiated at bulk rates, which can be more favorable than individual consumer plans. The firm fixed-price nature of this contract suggests that the cost per user is predetermined. To conduct a true benchmark, one would need to identify the total number of lines or devices covered and divide that by the total contract value, then compare this figure to per-line costs in other large federal wireless contracts, such as those awarded under GSA schedules or other agency-specific BPA calls. Given the competitive award, it is likely that the per-user cost is within a reasonable market range for government services.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and service level agreements (SLAs) associated with this contract?

Key performance indicators (KPIs) and service level agreements (SLAs) are critical components of any government contract to ensure service quality and accountability. For a wireless telecommunications contract of this magnitude, typical KPIs and SLAs would likely focus on network availability (uptime), data speeds, latency, call completion rates, and customer support response times. The contract documents would specify acceptable thresholds for these metrics and outline remedies or penalties if AT&T Mobility fails to meet them. For instance, a guaranteed network uptime of 99.9% might be stipulated, along with specific data throughput minimums for different service tiers. These agreements are essential for the U.S. Marshals Service to ensure that their critical communication needs are consistently met.

What is AT&T Mobility LLC's track record in fulfilling large federal wireless contracts?

AT&T Mobility LLC has a long-standing and extensive track record of serving the federal government with wireless telecommunications services. As one of the largest telecommunications providers in the United States, AT&T has consistently secured significant government contracts across various agencies, including defense, law enforcement, and civilian departments. Their experience includes managing large-scale deployments, ensuring network reliability, and adhering to stringent security requirements. Past performance evaluations, often available through government contract databases or agency reports, generally indicate AT&T's capability to meet the demands of complex federal requirements. Their established infrastructure and experience make them a frequent awardee for substantial wireless service contracts.

Are there any specific security requirements or data protection clauses mandated in this contract?

Given the nature of the Department of Justice and the U.S. Marshals Service, it is highly probable that this contract includes stringent security requirements and data protection clauses. Federal contracts, especially those involving sensitive law enforcement operations, mandate compliance with regulations such as the Federal Information Security Modernization Act (FISMA) and potentially specific agency-defined security protocols. These clauses would govern how data is transmitted, stored, and protected, including requirements for encryption, access controls, and incident reporting. AT&T Mobility would be obligated to meet these standards to safeguard sensitive government information and ensure the integrity of their communication network.

Industry Classification

NAICS: InformationWired and Wireless Telecommunications CarriersWireless Telecommunications Carriers (except Satellite)

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSIT AND TELECOM - NETWORK

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Tyto Athene, LLC

Address: 1025 LENOX PARK BLVD NE, ATLANTA, GA, 30319

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $28,929

Exercised Options: $28,929

Current Obligation: $28,929

Actual Outlays: $6,997

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15F06720A0001516

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2023-11-01

Current End Date: 2026-07-31

Potential End Date: 2026-07-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-10

More Contracts from ATT Mobility LLC

View all ATT Mobility LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Justice Contracts

View all Department of Justice contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending