DOJ's $5.7M Deloitte contract for OCDETF support awarded via full and open competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $5,741,770 ($5.7M)

Contractor: Deloitte Consulting LLP

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2025-04-01

End Date: 2026-04-30

Contract Duration: 394 days

Daily Burn Rate: $14.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: OCDETF PROGRAM SUPPORT SERVICES (TOS 2, 3, 4, AND 5)

Place of Performance

Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22209

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $5.7 million to DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP for work described as: OCDETF PROGRAM SUPPORT SERVICES (TOS 2, 3, 4, AND 5) Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single, well-established vendor, suggesting a focus on specialized expertise. 2. The contract type (Time and Materials) can pose cost control challenges if not closely managed. 3. Performance period of over a year indicates a need for ongoing support services. 4. The administrative management and general management consulting services NAICS code points to a broad scope of potential activities. 5. The contract is a delivery order, implying it's part of a larger, potentially pre-existing agreement. 6. The vendor has a significant presence in the federal contracting space.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $5.7 million over approximately 13 months for administrative management and general management consulting services appears within a reasonable range for specialized support. However, without specific details on the services rendered and the labor categories involved, a precise value-for-money assessment is difficult. Benchmarking against similar contracts for program support services within the Department of Justice or other law enforcement agencies would provide a clearer picture of whether the pricing is competitive. The Time and Materials pricing model necessitates diligent oversight to ensure costs remain controlled and aligned with the value delivered.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The fact that it is a delivery order suggests it may have been competed as part of a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) contract or a similar vehicle. The presence of full and open competition generally promotes price discovery and allows the government to select the best value offer. However, the number of bids received is not specified, which would provide further insight into the level of actual competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it encourages a wider range of vendors to compete, potentially leading to lower prices and better service offerings. This approach maximizes the opportunity for the government to secure the most advantageous terms.

Public Impact

The Department of Justice, specifically the Offices, Boards and Divisions, will benefit from enhanced program support services. The contract is expected to deliver administrative management and general management consulting services, crucial for the efficient operation of federal programs. The geographic impact is primarily within Virginia, where the vendor is located, but the services likely support national-level DOJ initiatives. The contract supports the federal workforce by engaging a contractor to provide specialized expertise, potentially freeing up government personnel for core mission activities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The Time and Materials (T&M) contract type can lead to cost overruns if not meticulously managed and monitored for scope creep.
Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes it difficult to assess the quality and effectiveness of services delivered.
The broad NAICS code (541611) for Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services could encompass a wide range of activities, making it challenging to pinpoint the exact nature and value of the support provided without further detail.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process that likely yielded a fair price.
The vendor, Deloitte Consulting LLP, is a large and established firm with significant experience in government contracting, indicating a lower risk of performance failure.
The contract is a delivery order under a larger vehicle, which may indicate pre-negotiated favorable terms and conditions.
The contract duration of over a year suggests a stable and ongoing need for these services, implying a recognized value to the agency.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically administrative management and general management consulting. This sector is a significant component of federal spending, supporting a wide array of government functions. The market for these services is competitive, with numerous large and small businesses offering specialized expertise. The value of this contract, approximately $5.7 million, is moderate within the context of federal IT and professional services spending, which can range from millions to billions of dollars for large-scale support initiatives.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation (sb) is false, and the contract is not a small business set-aside (ss). This suggests that the primary awardee is likely a large business. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem from this specific award appears limited, although the prime contractor may engage small businesses as subcontractors if not explicitly prohibited or mandated otherwise.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program office within the Department of Justice. Performance monitoring, invoice review, and adherence to contract terms are standard oversight mechanisms. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract databases like FPDS-NG, where basic award information is publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected or identified during the contract's performance.

Related Government Programs

Department of Justice Program Support Services
Administrative Management Consulting Services
General Management Consulting Services
Law Enforcement Support Contracts
Federal Consulting Services

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials pricing model.
Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data hinders assessment of service quality.
Broad scope implied by NAICS code requires careful monitoring to ensure focused and valuable support.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $5.7 million to DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP. OCDETF PROGRAM SUPPORT SERVICES (TOS 2, 3, 4, AND 5)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DELOITTE CONSULTING LLP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Offices, Boards and Divisions).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $5.7 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-04-01. End: 2026-04-30.

What specific services are included under 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' for the OCDETF program?

The NAICS code 541611, 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services,' is broad and can encompass a wide range of activities. For the OCDETF (Organized Crime Drug Enforcement Task Force) program, these services likely include strategic planning, organizational analysis, process improvement, policy development, program management support, and potentially data analysis and reporting to enhance the effectiveness and efficiency of the task force's operations. Specific deliverables would be detailed in the Statement of Work (SOW) or Performance Work Statement (PWS) associated with the delivery order, which are not publicly available in this data snippet. These services aim to optimize how the OCDETF manages its resources, coordinates interagency efforts, and achieves its mission objectives in combating major drug trafficking organizations.

How does the $5.7 million contract value compare to historical spending on similar OCDETF support services?

Without access to historical spending data specifically for OCDETF program support services from the Department of Justice, a direct comparison is challenging. However, $5.7 million over approximately 13 months represents an average monthly expenditure of roughly $438,000. This figure needs to be contextualized against the overall budget and scope of the OCDETF program. Federal agencies often award multiple contracts for various support functions. To assess if this value is typical, one would need to analyze past contract awards for similar consulting and administrative support services to the OCDETF or comparable large-scale federal law enforcement initiatives, looking at both the total value and the duration of those contracts.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or metrics used to evaluate Deloitte's performance under this contract?

The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or metrics for evaluating Deloitte's performance. Typically, these would be outlined in the contract's Performance Work Statement (PWS) or Statement of Work (SOW). Common KPIs for consulting and administrative support contracts include timeliness of deliverables, quality of reports and analyses, adherence to project milestones, client satisfaction, and the effectiveness of implemented recommendations. For the OCDETF program, KPIs might also relate to improvements in operational efficiency, enhanced interagency coordination, or better resource allocation resulting from the consulting services. The contracting officer's representative (COR) is usually responsible for monitoring performance against these metrics.

What is Deloitte Consulting LLP's track record with the Department of Justice and similar federal agencies?

Deloitte Consulting LLP is a major federal contractor with a substantial track record across numerous government agencies, including the Department of Justice. They frequently win contracts for a wide range of services, including management consulting, IT support, and program management. Their history with the DOJ likely includes support for various divisions and initiatives, given their size and expertise. A review of federal procurement data (e.g., FPDS-NG) would reveal the extent and nature of their past awards. Generally, large firms like Deloitte have extensive experience navigating federal acquisition regulations and delivering complex projects, though performance can vary by specific contract and program.

What are the potential risks associated with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract for these services?

Time and Materials (T&M) contracts, like the one awarded to Deloitte, carry inherent risks, primarily related to cost control. Unlike fixed-price contracts, T&M agreements reimburse the contractor for the actual cost of labor (at specified hourly rates) and materials, plus a fee or profit. The main risk is that the total cost can exceed initial estimates if the effort required is greater than anticipated or if there is scope creep. This necessitates robust government oversight to monitor labor hours, ensure efficient work, and prevent unnecessary tasking. Without strict management, T&M contracts can become more expensive than other contract types, potentially leading to less value for taxpayer money if not carefully controlled.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1919 N LYNN ST, ARLINGTON, VA, 22209

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $9,868,971

Exercised Options: $6,947,147

Current Obligation: $5,741,770

Actual Outlays: $3,127,140

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 2

Total Subaward Amount: $1,730,719

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QRAA18D001P

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline