DOJ awards $2.19M for PMO services to TUKNIK GOVERNMENT SERVICES LLC, a sole-source contract

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,190,963 ($2.2M)

Contractor: Tuknik Government Services LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2025-09-14

End Date: 2026-04-13

Contract Duration: 211 days

Daily Burn Rate: $10.4K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: PMO SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: CHANTILLY, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20151

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $2.2 million to TUKNIK GOVERNMENT SERVICES LLC for work described as: PMO SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded on a sole-source basis, limiting potential cost savings from competition. 2. The contract duration of 211 days suggests a focused scope of work. 3. Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services (NAICS 541611) is a common area for federal contracting. 4. The firm fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government. 5. Awarded to TUKNIK GOVERNMENT SERVICES LLC, their track record and past performance will be key indicators of value. 6. The contract is managed under the VA (Veterans Affairs) category, potentially indicating a focus on veteran-owned businesses or specific VA procurement vehicles.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract requires more detailed information on the specific PMO services required. However, the total value of $2.19 million for a period of approximately 7 months (211 days) suggests a monthly expenditure of roughly $1.04 million. This rate needs to be compared against similar PMO support contracts within the Department of Justice and across other federal agencies to determine if it represents good value for money. Without specific deliverables or performance metrics, a definitive assessment of value is challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning the FBI did not solicit bids from multiple vendors. This approach is typically used when a specific vendor possesses unique capabilities or when circumstances necessitate a rapid award. The lack of competition means that the FBI did not benefit from the price discovery and potential cost reductions that typically arise from a competitive bidding process. The justification for this sole-source award would need to be thoroughly reviewed to ensure it aligns with federal procurement regulations.

Taxpayer Impact: Sole-source awards can potentially lead to higher costs for taxpayers as the government does not leverage competitive pressures to secure the best possible pricing.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary of this contract is the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), which will receive Project Management Office (PMO) services. These services are expected to support the FBI's operational efficiency and project execution. The geographic impact is likely concentrated within the FBI's operational areas, primarily in Virginia where the contract is managed. The contract may have implications for the workforce by potentially requiring specialized project management expertise, either through the contractor's personnel or by augmenting existing FBI staff.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The federal consulting services market is substantial, with agencies frequently procuring administrative management and general management consulting services to enhance operational efficiency and strategic planning. This contract for PMO services falls within this broad category. Comparable spending benchmarks for PMO support can vary significantly based on the complexity of the projects, the level of expertise required, and the duration of the engagement. Agencies often use these services to manage large-scale initiatives, implement new technologies, or improve internal processes.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor does it indicate any specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses. Therefore, its direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless TUKNIK GOVERNMENT SERVICES LLC voluntarily engages small businesses as subcontractors. The absence of set-aside provisions means that opportunities for small businesses to directly compete for this specific contract were not prioritized.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will primarily reside with the contracting officers and program managers within the Federal Bureau of Investigation. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of financial oversight by establishing a ceiling cost. Transparency regarding the justification for the sole-source award and the performance metrics outlined in the contract would be crucial for public accountability. The Inspector General's office for the Department of Justice may conduct audits or investigations into the contract's execution if concerns arise.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

pmo-services, consulting-services, department-of-justice, federal-bureau-of-investigation, sole-source, firm-fixed-price, administrative-management, general-management, virginia, tuknik-government-services-llc, naics-541611

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $2.2 million to TUKNIK GOVERNMENT SERVICES LLC. PMO SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TUKNIK GOVERNMENT SERVICES LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Bureau of Investigation).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-14. End: 2026-04-13.

What is the specific justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis to TUKNIK GOVERNMENT SERVICES LLC?

The provided data does not include the specific justification for the sole-source award. Typically, sole-source contracts are awarded when only one responsible source is available or capable of providing the required services. This could be due to unique capabilities, proprietary technology, urgent and compelling needs, or specific statutory authority. A thorough review of the contract file and any associated justifications (e.g., Justification and Approval - J&A) would be necessary to understand the rationale behind this decision. Without this information, it's difficult to assess if the sole-source award was appropriate and in the government's best interest.

How does the pricing of this contract compare to similar PMO services procured by the FBI or other federal agencies?

Direct price comparison is challenging without detailed service descriptions and performance metrics for this contract. The total award of $2.19 million over approximately 7 months equates to a monthly burn rate of about $313,000. To benchmark this, one would need to identify comparable PMO contracts within the FBI or other agencies (e.g., DOJ, DHS) that involve similar scope, duration, and required expertise. Factors such as the level of support (e.g., strategic, tactical, operational), the seniority of personnel, and the specific deliverables would need to be aligned. A comprehensive analysis would involve reviewing publicly available contract data (like FPDS or USASpending) for similar services and assessing the average cost per month or per deliverable.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or deliverables associated with this PMO services contract?

The provided data does not specify the key performance indicators (KPIs) or detailed deliverables for this PMO services contract. Effective contract oversight and value assessment rely heavily on clearly defined performance metrics. For PMO services, typical KPIs might include on-time project completion rates, adherence to budget, quality of project documentation, stakeholder satisfaction, and risk mitigation effectiveness. The absence of this information in the summary data makes it difficult to evaluate the contractor's performance and the overall success of the contract in meeting the FBI's needs.

What is TUKNIK GOVERNMENT SERVICES LLC's track record with federal contracts, particularly for PMO services?

Assessing TUKNIK GOVERNMENT SERVICES LLC's track record requires examining their past performance on federal contracts. This would involve reviewing contract databases (e.g., FPDS, SAM.gov) for previous awards, contract values, performance evaluations (e.g., CPARS reports), and any history of contract modifications, disputes, or terminations. Specifically for PMO services, understanding their experience in managing similar projects for agencies like the FBI or other law enforcement entities would be crucial. A strong history of successful project delivery, positive performance reviews, and adherence to contract terms would indicate a lower risk and potentially higher value for this current award.

What is the historical spending trend for PMO services within the Federal Bureau of Investigation?

To understand the historical spending trend for PMO services within the FBI, one would need to analyze historical federal procurement data over several fiscal years. This analysis would involve querying databases like USASpending.gov or FPDS.gov for contracts awarded by the FBI under relevant NAICS codes (e.g., 541611 for Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services) and PSC codes related to management and financial consulting. Examining the total dollar amount spent annually on such services, the number of contracts awarded, and the types of services procured would reveal trends. This context helps determine if the current $2.19 million award is consistent with past spending patterns or represents a significant increase or decrease.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesAdministrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 3800 CENTERPOINT DR STE 700, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99503

Business Categories: Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,190,963

Exercised Options: $2,190,963

Current Obligation: $2,190,963

Actual Outlays: $1,192,641

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-09-14

Current End Date: 2026-04-13

Potential End Date: 2026-04-13 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-03-24

More Contracts from Tuknik Government Services LLC

View all Tuknik Government Services LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Justice Contracts

View all Department of Justice contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending