DOJ's FBI awards $9M+ facilities support contract to Guidehouse Inc. for 4 years

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $9,008,195 ($9.0M)

Contractor: Guidehouse Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2022-09-01

End Date: 2026-08-31

Contract Duration: 1,460 days

Daily Burn Rate: $6.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: FACILITIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SUPPORT FOR AESU

Place of Performance

Location: MCLEAN, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22102

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $9.0 million to GUIDEHOUSE INC. for work described as: FACILITIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SUPPORT FOR AESU Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract's firm-fixed-price structure aims to control costs for the FBI. 3. Duration of 4 years indicates a need for sustained facilities support. 4. The award value of over $9 million suggests a significant scope of services. 5. No small business set-aside was utilized, potentially limiting small business participation. 6. The contract is categorized under Engineering Services, aligning with specialized technical support.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $9 million over four years averages to about $2.25 million annually. Benchmarking this against similar facilities professional services contracts for federal agencies of the FBI's scale is challenging without more specific service details. However, the firm-fixed-price nature suggests an expectation of predictable costs. Further analysis would require comparing the specific deliverables and service levels to industry standards and other government contracts for comparable facilities management and engineering support.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 3 bidders suggests a moderate level of competition for this requirement. While more than one bidder is positive, a higher number typically leads to more robust price discovery and potentially better value for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition, with multiple bidders, provides a reasonable assurance that the selected price is competitive and reflects market conditions, benefiting taxpayers.

Public Impact

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is the primary beneficiary, receiving essential facilities professional services. Services likely include engineering, maintenance, and operational support for FBI facilities. The contract's geographic impact is centered in Virginia, where the services will be delivered. The contract supports specialized professional roles within the facilities management and engineering sectors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for limited small business participation due to the absence of a set-aside.
The firm-fixed-price contract might not fully account for unforeseen complexities in facilities support.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical facilities support could pose a risk if performance falters.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive process.
Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the duration of the award.
Long-term duration (4 years) suggests a stable and ongoing need for these services.

Sector Analysis

The federal contracting landscape for facilities professional services is substantial, encompassing engineering, maintenance, and operational support across various agencies. This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS 541330), which is characterized by specialized technical expertise. The FBI's requirement for such services is consistent with the operational needs of large federal law enforcement agencies. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within broader facilities management or engineering support categories for government entities of similar size and complexity.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses indicated in the provided data. This means that opportunities for small businesses to directly participate in this contract are limited to subcontracting roles, if any are offered by the prime contractor, Guidehouse Inc. The absence of a set-aside may reduce the direct flow of federal dollars to the small business ecosystem for this specific procurement.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is subject to standard federal procurement oversight mechanisms. As a firm-fixed-price contract, performance and deliverables will be monitored by the FBI contracting officer and technical representatives. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases like FPDS. The Inspector General for the Department of Justice would have jurisdiction to investigate any potential fraud, waste, or abuse related to this contract.

Related Government Programs

Federal Bureau of Investigation Facilities Management Contracts
Department of Justice Professional Services Contracts
Engineering Services for Government Facilities
Government Facilities Operations and Maintenance

Risk Flags

Potential for scope creep impacting fixed-price budget.
Contractor performance risk for specialized engineering services.
Limited small business participation opportunities.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $9.0 million to GUIDEHOUSE INC.. FACILITIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SUPPORT FOR AESU

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GUIDEHOUSE INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Bureau of Investigation).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $9.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-09-01. End: 2026-08-31.

What is the specific scope of 'facilities professional services' covered under this contract?

The provided data indicates the contract is for 'FACILITIES PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SUPPORT FOR AESU' and falls under NAICS code 541330 (Engineering Services). While the exact scope isn't detailed, this typically encompasses a range of services such as architectural design, civil engineering, mechanical engineering, electrical engineering, environmental engineering, and potentially project management related to the design, construction, renovation, operation, and maintenance of federal facilities. For the FBI, this could include support for secure facilities, specialized equipment installations, infrastructure upgrades, and compliance with building codes and safety regulations. The 'AESU' acronym might refer to a specific FBI division or facility requiring these specialized engineering and support services.

How does the awarded price of $9,008,194.73 compare to similar FBI facilities support contracts?

Direct comparison of this contract's value to similar FBI facilities support contracts is difficult without more granular data on the specific services rendered, contract duration, and the complexity of the facilities involved. However, the award value of over $9 million spread across a 4-year period (approximately $2.25 million per year) suggests a significant, ongoing requirement for specialized engineering and professional services. The FBI operates numerous high-security facilities, and the costs associated with maintaining and upgrading them can be substantial. To benchmark effectively, one would need to analyze contracts with similar NAICS codes (e.g., 541330) awarded by the FBI or other large law enforcement agencies for comparable facility types and service scopes over similar timeframes.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or service level agreements (SLAs) associated with this contract?

The provided data does not specify the Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or Service Level Agreements (SLAs) for this contract. However, for a facilities professional services contract, particularly one involving engineering support for an agency like the FBI, typical KPIs would likely focus on response times for service requests, resolution times for issues, adherence to safety and environmental regulations, quality of engineering designs and assessments, project completion rates within budget and schedule, and overall client satisfaction. SLAs might define specific uptime requirements for critical building systems, maintenance schedules, and reporting frequencies. These metrics are crucial for ensuring the effective and efficient operation of FBI facilities.

What is Guidehouse Inc.'s track record with federal facilities support contracts?

Guidehouse Inc. has a significant presence in federal contracting, often providing management consulting, technology, and financial services. While their core expertise may lean towards consulting and advisory services, they do engage in broader professional services that can encompass areas relevant to facilities support, especially in program management, strategic planning, and operational efficiency. To assess their specific track record for facilities professional services, a review of their past performance on similar government contracts, particularly those involving engineering or complex facility operations, would be necessary. This would involve examining contract databases for awards, performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any reported issues or successes.

What is the risk associated with the firm-fixed-price contract type for this service?

The firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type aims to provide cost certainty to the government by establishing a set price for the defined scope of work. For the contractor, Guidehouse Inc., this means they assume the risk of cost overruns. For the FBI, the primary risk with an FFP contract in a service area like facilities professional support is that the contractor might cut corners on quality or scope to maintain profitability if unforeseen complexities arise that were not adequately anticipated during the bidding process. This risk is mitigated by clear performance standards, robust oversight, and potentially incentives or penalties tied to service delivery. If the scope of work is not well-defined or if significant changes are required, an FFP contract can become less advantageous.

How does the competition level (3 bidders) impact the value received by the FBI?

A competition level involving three bidders suggests a moderate degree of market interest and engagement for this specific contract. While more than one bidder is generally preferable to a sole-source or limited competition scenario, three bidders may not represent the maximum possible price discovery. In highly competitive markets, a larger number of bidders often drives prices down further and encourages more innovative solutions. With three bidders, the FBI likely received competitive proposals, but there's a possibility that a more robust competition with additional bidders could have yielded even better pricing or terms. The value received is thus likely good, but potentially not optimal compared to a scenario with higher bidder participation.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Peraton Technology Services Inc.

Address: 1676 INTERNATIONAL DR STE 800, MCLEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $13,128,835

Exercised Options: $9,068,195

Current Obligation: $9,008,195

Actual Outlays: $7,806,882

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15F06722D0000423

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline