DOJ's $51.9M contract for computer systems design services awarded to ManTech Advanced Systems International, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $51,924,870 ($51.9M)

Contractor: Mantech Advanced Systems International, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2019-04-01

End Date: 2020-03-31

Contract Duration: 365 days

Daily Burn Rate: $142.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE

Sector: IT

Official Description: COMPS2 OY2

Place of Performance

Location: CLARKSBURG, HARRISON County, WEST VIRGINIA, 26306

State: West Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $51.9 million to MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. for work described as: COMPS2 OY2 Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair given the scope of IT systems design. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open process, suggesting potential for competitive pricing. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, typical for complex IT service contracts. 4. Performance context is a single delivery order, making long-term assessment difficult. 5. Sector positioning is within IT services, a critical area for federal agencies. 6. The contract duration of one year suggests a focused, project-based engagement.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of approximately $51.9 million for one year of computer systems design services is substantial. Benchmarking against similar contracts for complex IT solutions is necessary for a definitive value assessment. Without specific performance metrics or detailed cost breakdowns, it's challenging to definitively state if this represents excellent value. However, the nature of systems design often involves significant upfront investment and specialized expertise, which can justify higher costs.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The presence of multiple bidders (3 indicated) suggests a healthy competitive environment. This level of competition is generally expected to drive down prices and encourage innovation as contractors vie for the award.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process is beneficial for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of securing services at the most competitive price, preventing potential overspending associated with less competitive procurement methods.

Public Impact

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) is the primary beneficiary, receiving essential IT systems design services. These services are critical for maintaining and potentially upgrading the FBI's operational IT infrastructure. The geographic impact is primarily within West Virginia, where the contractor is located. Workforce implications include the employment of skilled IT professionals by the contractor.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep in complex IT design projects.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical systems design could pose a risk if performance falters.
The cost-plus award fee structure requires careful monitoring to ensure cost control and performance incentives are aligned.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust selection process.
The contractor, ManTech Advanced Systems International, Inc., is a known entity in the federal IT services space.
The contract specifies a clear delivery order structure, implying defined deliverables.

Sector Analysis

The IT services sector is a significant component of federal spending, with agencies relying heavily on contractors for system design, development, and maintenance. This contract falls within the Computer Systems Design Services category, which is crucial for modernizing government IT infrastructure. Comparable spending benchmarks in this sector vary widely based on project complexity, duration, and specific technologies involved.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (sb: false). There is no explicit information on subcontracting plans for small businesses. Without specific set-aside requirements or mandated subcontracting goals, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem for this particular award is likely limited, though the prime contractor may engage small businesses as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and program managers within the FBI. Accountability measures are embedded in the contract terms, including performance standards and payment schedules tied to deliverables. Transparency is facilitated through federal procurement databases like FPDS-NG. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

FBI IT Modernization Programs
Department of Justice IT Services
Federal Civilian IT Procurement
Computer Systems Design Services Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns in CPAF contracts.
Complexity of IT systems design projects can lead to unforeseen challenges.
Dependence on contractor performance for critical IT infrastructure.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $51.9 million to MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.. COMPS2 OY2

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Bureau of Investigation).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $51.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2019-04-01. End: 2020-03-31.

What is ManTech Advanced Systems International, Inc.'s track record with the federal government, particularly the Department of Justice?

ManTech Advanced Systems International, Inc. has a significant history of contracting with the federal government across various agencies, including the Department of Justice. Their portfolio often includes complex IT services, cybersecurity, and systems engineering. Reviewing their past performance ratings and any documented issues on contracts of similar scope and value would provide insight into their reliability and capability. Federal procurement data often reveals patterns of successful contract completions, as well as any instances of disputes, performance deficiencies, or contract terminations. A deeper dive into their specific work with the FBI would be most relevant for assessing their suitability for this particular systems design contract.

How does the $51.9 million cost compare to similar IT systems design contracts awarded by the FBI or other agencies?

Benchmarking this $51.9 million contract requires comparing it against IT systems design contracts of similar complexity, duration, and scope awarded by the FBI or other federal agencies within the last few years. Factors such as the specific technologies involved, the level of customization required, and the contractor's overhead rates significantly influence pricing. Contracts for enterprise-wide system overhauls or the development of highly specialized software typically command higher prices than smaller, project-specific design tasks. Without access to detailed cost breakdowns and specific performance outcomes for comparable contracts, a precise value-for-money assessment is difficult. However, the full and open competition suggests an effort to achieve competitive pricing.

What are the primary risks associated with this type of Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contract for computer systems design?

Cost Plus Award Fee (CPAF) contracts carry inherent risks related to cost control and performance management. For the government, the primary risk is that the contractor may incur higher costs than anticipated, as the base fee covers allowable costs plus a fixed fee, with an additional award amount tied to performance. Contractors may have less incentive to aggressively control costs if they believe they can achieve a high award fee regardless. For the government, effective oversight is crucial to ensure that costs are reasonable and allocable, and that the award fee criteria are objective, measurable, and aligned with desired outcomes. Misaligned award criteria or insufficient oversight can lead to inflated costs without commensurate performance improvements, representing a risk to taxpayer value.

What is the expected effectiveness of the computer systems designed under this contract for the FBI?

The effectiveness of the computer systems designed under this contract hinges on several factors, including the clarity and completeness of the FBI's requirements, the contractor's technical expertise, and the robustness of the design specifications. Assuming the contract objectives are well-defined and the contractor successfully meets performance standards, the designed systems should enhance the FBI's operational capabilities, improve data processing efficiency, and support its mission-critical functions. The success will be measured against predefined performance metrics and the ultimate utility of the systems in real-world FBI operations. Post-implementation reviews and user feedback will be key indicators of effectiveness.

How has the FBI's spending on computer systems design services evolved over the past five years?

Analyzing the FBI's spending trends on computer systems design services over the past five years would reveal patterns of investment in IT infrastructure and modernization. This specific $51.9 million contract represents a significant, albeit single, data point within that trend. Examining historical data would show whether spending in this category has been increasing, decreasing, or remaining relatively stable. It would also indicate the typical contract types (e.g., fixed-price, cost-plus), competition levels, and the primary contractors involved. Such an analysis provides context for the current contract, highlighting whether it aligns with historical spending patterns or represents a shift in the FBI's approach to IT systems design procurement.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Mantech International Corporation (UEI: 053518312)

Address: 2251 CORPORATE PARK DRIVE, HERNDON, VA, 20171

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $51,924,870

Exercised Options: $51,924,870

Current Obligation: $51,924,870

Actual Outlays: $32,275,299

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS00Q09BGD0041

IDV Type: GWAC

Timeline