DOJ awards $463K for 9MM training ammunition to The Kinetic Group Sales LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $46,379 ($46.4K)

Contractor: THE Kinetic Group Sales LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2026-04-14

End Date: 2026-06-30

Contract Duration: 77 days

Daily Burn Rate: $602/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: TITLE: NOFD 9MM TRAINING AMMO REQUESTOR: MARK W WEBBER AFT#: 2026-NO-0011 REF AWARD/BPA: 15F06722D0004285 DELIVERY DATE: 06/30/2026

Place of Performance

Location: ANOKA, ANOKA County, MINNESOTA, 55303

State: Minnesota Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $46,378.62 to THE KINETIC GROUP SALES LLC for work described as: TITLE: NOFD 9MM TRAINING AMMO REQUESTOR: MARK W WEBBER AFT#: 2026-NO-0011 REF AWARD/BPA: 15F06722D0004285 DELIVERY DATE: 06/30/2026 Key points: 1. Value for money assessed through firm fixed-price contract, aiming for predictable costs. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open process, suggesting potential for competitive pricing. 3. Risk indicators include a short performance period and reliance on a single awardee. 4. Performance context is a delivery order against an existing BPA, implying prior vetting. 5. Sector positioning within small arms ammunition manufacturing, a niche but essential defense supply chain component.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The award of $463,786.62 for 9MM training ammunition appears reasonable given the firm fixed-price structure, which shifts cost risk to the contractor. Benchmarking against similar contracts for training ammunition is challenging without specific quantity and quality details, but the price per round can be inferred. The contract is a delivery order against an existing BPA, suggesting that pricing was likely negotiated and vetted during the initial BPA award, potentially offering better value than a new sole-source procurement.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, as indicated by the contract type. The presence of 3 bidders suggests a healthy level of interest and competition for this requirement. A competitive process generally leads to better price discovery and ensures that the government receives offers from multiple qualified sources, potentially driving down costs and improving the quality of goods or services offered.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by leveraging market forces to obtain the best possible price for the required ammunition.

Public Impact

Law enforcement agencies, specifically the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), will benefit from the supply of essential training ammunition. The services delivered include the provision of 9MM training ammunition, critical for maintaining operational readiness and proficiency. The geographic impact is primarily within Minnesota, where the contractor is located, though the ammunition will likely be distributed to DEA facilities nationwide. Workforce implications are minimal, primarily related to the contractor's manufacturing and logistics operations.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The contract falls within the Small Arms Ammunition Manufacturing sector, a specialized segment of the defense and law enforcement industrial base. This sector is characterized by stringent quality control requirements and often involves long-term supply agreements. The market size for training ammunition is significant, driven by the continuous training needs of federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies, as well as military branches. This contract represents a small but necessary component of the DEA's overall ammunition procurement strategy.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses, nor does it appear to involve significant subcontracting opportunities for small businesses based on the limited information. The contractor, The Kinetic Group Sales LLC, is likely a small business itself, but the primary analysis here focuses on whether the contract *itself* was a set-aside or had explicit small business subcontracting goals. Without further details on the contractor's size or subcontracting plans, the direct impact on the broader small business ecosystem is unclear, though it supports the operations of the awarded entity.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract is managed by the Department of Justice, specifically the Drug Enforcement Administration. As a delivery order against an existing Basic Ordering Agreement (BOA), the initial vetting and oversight were likely conducted during the BOA's award process. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm fixed-price contract terms, requiring delivery of specified goods by a set date. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards, though detailed performance metrics are not publicly disclosed.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

ammunition, training, law-enforcement, drug-enforcement-administration, department-of-justice, firm-fixed-price, delivery-order, full-and-open-competition, small-arms-manufacturing, minnesota, defense-industrial-base

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $46,378.62 to THE KINETIC GROUP SALES LLC. TITLE: NOFD 9MM TRAINING AMMO REQUESTOR: MARK W WEBBER AFT#: 2026-NO-0011 REF AWARD/BPA: 15F06722D0004285 DELIVERY DATE: 06/30/2026

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE KINETIC GROUP SALES LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Drug Enforcement Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $46,378.62.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-14. End: 2026-06-30.

What is the contractor's track record with the federal government, particularly regarding similar ammunition procurements?

The Kinetic Group Sales LLC has a history of federal contract awards, including previous awards related to ammunition. Analyzing their past performance on similar contracts, such as delivery orders or other agreements for small arms ammunition, would provide insight into their reliability, quality control, and ability to meet delivery schedules. A review of contract performance reports (e.g., CPARS) and any past issues or commendations would be crucial. Given this is a delivery order against a BPA, their performance under the parent BPA would be a key indicator of their established track record with the agency.

How does the price per round for this training ammunition compare to market rates or other federal contracts?

Without the specific quantity of ammunition awarded, calculating a precise price per round is not possible from the provided data. However, the total award amount is $463,786.62. If, for example, the contract was for 1 million rounds, the price per round would be approximately $0.46. This figure should then be benchmarked against industry averages for 9MM training ammunition, considering factors like manufacturer, quality standards (e.g., NATO vs. commercial), and bulk purchasing discounts. Comparing this to other federal contracts for similar training ammunition, adjusted for quantity and delivery location, would further contextualize the value.

What are the primary risks associated with this specific contract award?

Key risks include the short performance period (77 days from award to delivery), which could strain the contractor's production and logistics capabilities, potentially leading to delays. There's also a risk associated with relying on a single awardee for this specific delivery order, even if the underlying BPA had multiple awardees. Furthermore, the limited public detail on the exact specifications and quantity of ammunition makes it difficult to fully assess quality assurance and potential performance risks. Finally, dependence on ammunition supply chains can be subject to geopolitical or manufacturing disruptions.

How effective is the competition level in ensuring optimal value for taxpayers?

The contract was awarded under a 'full and open competition' with three bidders. This level of competition is generally considered healthy and is expected to drive competitive pricing and encourage multiple vendors to offer their best terms. The fact that three bids were received suggests that the market is responsive and that the government likely received a reasonable price. However, the true effectiveness depends on whether these three bidders represented the majority of capable suppliers and whether the evaluation criteria adequately prioritized value beyond just the lowest price.

What is the historical spending pattern for 9MM training ammunition by the DEA or DOJ?

Analyzing historical spending data for 9MM training ammunition by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) and the broader Department of Justice (DOJ) is essential for context. This contract's value ($463,786.62) should be compared against previous years' expenditures for similar training ammunition. Understanding trends in volume, pricing, and awarded contractors can reveal whether spending is increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable. Significant deviations from historical patterns might warrant further investigation into the reasons, such as increased training requirements, changes in unit costs, or shifts in procurement strategies.

Are there any specific quality control or performance standards mandated for this ammunition?

The provided data does not specify the exact quality control or performance standards for the 9MM training ammunition. However, federal procurements for ammunition typically adhere to strict specifications, often referencing industry standards (e.g., SAAMI) or specific military/law enforcement requirements. The contract type (Firm Fixed Price) implies the contractor is responsible for meeting all specified quality requirements. The Drug Enforcement Administration would have detailed specifications within the parent BPA or the delivery order itself, ensuring the ammunition is suitable for training purposes and meets safety and reliability benchmarks.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingOther Fabricated Metal Product ManufacturingSmall Arms Ammunition Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: AMMUNITION AND EXPLOSIVES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Vista Outdoor Inc.

Address: 1 VISTA WAY, ANOKA, MN, 55303

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $46,379

Exercised Options: $46,379

Current Obligation: $46,379

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15F06722D0004285

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2026-04-14

Current End Date: 2026-06-30

Potential End Date: 2026-06-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-10

More Contracts from THE Kinetic Group Sales LLC

View all THE Kinetic Group Sales LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Justice Contracts

View all Department of Justice contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending