DOJ's $21.1M consulting contract awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton for administrative management services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $21,099,104 ($21.1M)

Contractor: Booz Allen Hamilton Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2023-09-01

End Date: 2028-08-31

Contract Duration: 1,826 days

Daily Burn Rate: $11.6K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: Other

Official Description: ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT AND GENERAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: MCLEAN, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22102

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $21.1 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC for work described as: ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT AND GENERAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in management consulting for the DEA. 2. Booz Allen Hamilton, a large established firm, secured this contract. 3. The contract duration of five years suggests a long-term need for these services. 4. Administrative management consulting is a broad category, indicating potential for wide-ranging support. 5. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process. 6. The use of a BPA Call indicates a streamlined procurement method for an existing framework agreement.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $21.1 million over five years for administrative management consulting services appears reasonable given the contractor's expertise and the scope of potential support. Benchmarking against similar large-scale consulting contracts for federal agencies suggests this falls within expected ranges for comprehensive management support. The pricing structure, likely based on labor hours, will be a key factor in determining the ultimate value for money delivered.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating that multiple qualified vendors had the opportunity to bid. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this method generally fosters competitive pricing and encourages a wide range of solutions. The use of a BPA Call suggests that the underlying framework agreement was also competitively sourced, further supporting a competitive award.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it typically leads to more competitive pricing and a broader selection of qualified contractors, ensuring the government receives the best value.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), which will receive administrative management and general management consulting services. These services are expected to enhance the operational efficiency and effectiveness of the DEA's administrative functions. The geographic impact is likely concentrated within the DEA's operational areas, primarily in Virginia where the contract is managed. The contract may have implications for the federal workforce by potentially supporting or augmenting existing administrative roles.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if the administrative needs are not clearly defined and managed.
Reliance on a single large contractor could limit flexibility in adapting to rapidly changing needs.
Ensuring the consulting services directly translate into measurable improvements in DEA operations is crucial.

Positive Signals

Award to a well-established contractor with a proven track record in government consulting.
The use of a BPA Call suggests an existing, vetted procurement vehicle, potentially streamlining delivery.
The five-year duration allows for in-depth project execution and relationship building for sustained support.

Sector Analysis

Administrative management and general management consulting services represent a significant segment of the professional services market. Federal agencies frequently procure these services to improve efficiency, implement new strategies, and manage complex operations. The market is characterized by a mix of large, established firms like Booz Allen Hamilton and smaller, specialized consultancies. Spending in this category often fluctuates with agency priorities and budget cycles.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside component, as indicated by 'sb: false'. While Booz Allen Hamilton is a large business, the contract does not explicitly mention subcontracting goals for small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine if subcontracting opportunities are mandated or encouraged within the BPA framework.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight will likely be managed by the Drug Enforcement Administration contracting officers and program managers. Transparency is facilitated through federal procurement databases like FPDS. Accountability measures would be tied to performance metrics and deliverables outlined in the contract. Inspector General jurisdiction may apply if fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Administrative Support Services
Management and Financial Consulting, Acquisition and Grants Process Support, and Business Program and Project Management Services
Professional Services
Management Consulting

Risk Flags

Potential for vendor lock-in if not managed carefully.
Risk of recommendations not being actionable or culturally aligned.
Difficulty in quantifying the direct impact of consulting services on mission outcomes.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $21.1 million to BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC. ADMINISTRATIVE MANAGEMENT AND GENERAL MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Drug Enforcement Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $21.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-09-01. End: 2028-08-31.

What is Booz Allen Hamilton's track record with the Department of Justice and the DEA specifically?

Booz Allen Hamilton has a substantial history of contracting with the Department of Justice (DOJ) and its various components, including the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). Their portfolio often includes a wide range of services such as IT support, cybersecurity, intelligence analysis, and management consulting. For the DEA, they have previously provided support in areas related to operational planning, data analytics, and administrative process improvements. Examining specific past performance evaluations and contract histories within FPDS would provide a more granular understanding of their success and any potential issues encountered on prior engagements with these specific agencies.

How does the $21.1 million contract value compare to similar administrative consulting contracts awarded by the DEA or other large federal agencies?

The $21.1 million contract value over five years, averaging approximately $4.22 million annually, positions this as a significant, but not exceptionally large, consulting engagement for a major federal agency like the DEA. Comparable contracts for broad administrative management and general management consulting services awarded to large firms by agencies such as the FBI, DHS, or HHS can range from a few million to tens of millions of dollars per year, depending on the scope and duration. Contracts focused on highly specialized areas like cybersecurity or large-scale IT modernization might command higher values. This contract appears to be within the expected range for comprehensive, agency-wide administrative support consulting.

What are the primary risks associated with this type of administrative management consulting contract?

Key risks include the potential for poorly defined objectives leading to scope creep, where the project expands beyond its original intent, increasing costs and delaying timelines. There's also a risk of insufficient knowledge transfer from consultants to agency staff, creating dependency. Performance measurement can be challenging for consulting services, making it difficult to objectively assess value and return on investment. Furthermore, if the consultants' recommendations are not aligned with the agency's culture or operational realities, implementation can face significant resistance, undermining the contract's effectiveness. Ensuring clear deliverables and robust oversight is critical to mitigate these risks.

What specific administrative functions or programs is this contract likely intended to improve?

Given the broad nature of 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services,' this contract could support a wide array of functions within the DEA. Potential areas include optimizing budget and financial management processes, improving human capital management and workforce planning, streamlining procurement and supply chain operations, enhancing internal communications and policy development, or supporting strategic planning and performance management initiatives. The contract may also involve assessing and recommending improvements to organizational structures, business processes, and the implementation of new management systems or technologies to enhance overall operational efficiency and effectiveness across the agency.

What has been the historical spending trend for administrative management consulting services at the DEA?

Historical spending on administrative management and general management consulting services by the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) can be analyzed through federal procurement data. While specific year-over-year figures for this exact NAICS code (541611) would require detailed data extraction, agencies like the DEA typically allocate significant resources to professional services to support their complex missions. Spending in this category often increases during periods of organizational change, strategic realignment, or when specific operational challenges require external expertise. Fluctuations can also be tied to overall agency budgets and shifting priorities. A review of past FPDS data would reveal trends in contract awards, values, and durations for similar services.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Booz Allen Hamilton Holding Corporation

Address: 8283 GREENSBORO DR, MCLEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $29,853,652

Exercised Options: $29,853,652

Current Obligation: $21,099,104

Actual Outlays: $9,806,886

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 2

Total Subaward Amount: $6,487,159

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15DDHQ22A00000012

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline