DOJ's $28.1M Motorola Solutions contract for maintenance and installation services awarded via full and open competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $28,122,302 ($28.1M)

Contractor: Motorola Solutions, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2019-09-28

End Date: 2024-09-27

Contract Duration: 1,826 days

Daily Burn Rate: $15.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: MAINTENANCE AND INSTALLATION SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: CHICAGO, COOK County, ILLINOIS, 60661

State: Illinois Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $28.1 million to MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC. for work described as: MAINTENANCE AND INSTALLATION SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single vendor, Motorola Solutions, Inc., for specialized maintenance and installation services. 2. The contract duration spans 1826 days, indicating a long-term need for these services. 3. Services are categorized under Engineering Services (NAICS 541330), suggesting a technical and professional scope. 4. Awarded as a Delivery Order, implying it's part of a larger contract vehicle. 5. The contract was subject to full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process. 6. The firm-fixed-price contract type helps manage cost certainty for the government.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $28.1 million over approximately five years for maintenance and installation services appears reasonable given the specialized nature of engineering services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for large-scale communication systems maintenance would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure offers cost predictability, which is a positive indicator for value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely solicited and considered. The presence of a single delivery order suggests this might be one of many under a broader contract, but the initial competition for the parent vehicle was open. The level of competition is generally positive for price discovery and ensuring fair market value.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive bidding process that aims to secure the best possible pricing and service quality for essential maintenance and installation services.

Public Impact

Law enforcement agencies, particularly within the Drug Enforcement Administration, benefit from reliable maintenance and installation of critical systems. Ensures the operational readiness and effectiveness of communication and surveillance equipment. Services are geographically focused in Illinois (IL), impacting federal operations within that state. Supports a specialized technical workforce involved in the installation and upkeep of advanced systems.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for vendor lock-in if specialized knowledge is required for maintenance.
Reliance on a single vendor for critical infrastructure maintenance could pose risks if performance degrades.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Full and open competition suggests a well-contested award process.
Long-term contract indicates a sustained need and potential for stable service delivery.

Sector Analysis

The Engineering Services sector (NAICS 541330) encompasses a wide range of professional services, including the design, development, and implementation of complex systems. This contract falls within the government's broader spending on technology infrastructure and operational support for law enforcement. Comparable spending often includes IT services, telecommunications equipment maintenance, and specialized system integration.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (SB=false) and there is no explicit mention of subcontracting goals. This suggests that the primary award went to a large business, and opportunities for small businesses would likely be through subcontracting if initiated by Motorola Solutions, Inc.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Drug Enforcement Administration's program management and the Department of Justice's contracting oversight. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases like FPDS. Specific performance monitoring and accountability measures would be detailed in the contract's statement of work and delivery order terms.

Related Government Programs

Federal Law Enforcement Technology
Communications Infrastructure Maintenance
Engineering and Technical Services
Drug Enforcement Administration Operations Support

Risk Flags

Long contract duration may increase risk of obsolescence or changing requirements.
Reliance on a single vendor for critical services.
Potential for cost overruns if scope creep occurs, despite fixed-price.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $28.1 million to MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC.. MAINTENANCE AND INSTALLATION SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MOTOROLA SOLUTIONS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Drug Enforcement Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $28.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2019-09-28. End: 2024-09-27.

What is the track record of Motorola Solutions, Inc. in performing similar maintenance and installation services for federal agencies?

Motorola Solutions, Inc. is a well-established provider of communication and information technology solutions for government agencies, including law enforcement. They have a history of securing contracts for public safety communication systems, command and control software, and related services. Their performance on similar federal contracts would be detailed in past performance evaluations, which are typically considered during the bidding process. Reviewing their contract history with agencies like the DEA, FBI, and DHS can provide insights into their reliability, technical capabilities, and adherence to contract terms. While specific performance metrics for this particular contract are not detailed here, their consistent presence in the federal contracting space suggests a generally positive track record.

How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar engineering and installation services?

Benchmarking the $28.1 million contract value against market rates for similar engineering and installation services requires detailed analysis of the specific scope of work, technology involved, and geographic location. As a firm-fixed-price contract, the price is set, and value is assessed based on the deliverables. Without a detailed breakdown of labor hours, material costs, and specific technical requirements, a precise comparison is difficult. However, given that Motorola Solutions is a major provider in this space, and the contract was awarded through full and open competition, it suggests the pricing was deemed competitive at the time of award. Further analysis would involve comparing unit costs for specific components or labor rates against industry standards and other government contracts for comparable services.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Primary risks associated with this contract include potential vendor lock-in due to specialized knowledge requirements, performance degradation over the five-year period, and the possibility of unforeseen technical challenges. Mitigation strategies likely include clearly defined performance standards in the contract, regular performance reviews by the DEA, and contingency planning for critical system failures. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract also shifts some financial risk to the contractor. Furthermore, the initial full and open competition process helps mitigate the risk of awarding the contract to an underqualified vendor. Ongoing oversight by the contracting agency is crucial for identifying and addressing any emerging risks throughout the contract's lifecycle.

How effective has this contract been in ensuring the operational readiness of DEA systems in Illinois?

Assessing the effectiveness of this contract in ensuring operational readiness requires access to performance data and operational metrics from the DEA. The contract's purpose is to provide maintenance and installation services, which directly contribute to system uptime and functionality. Positive indicators would include minimal system downtime, successful implementation of upgrades or new installations, and positive feedback from end-users within the DEA. Conversely, issues like frequent service disruptions or delays in installations would suggest lower effectiveness. Without specific performance reports or user feedback, a definitive judgment on effectiveness cannot be made solely from the award data. However, the renewal or continuation of such services typically implies a level of satisfaction with the contractor's contribution to operational readiness.

What are the historical spending patterns for similar maintenance and installation services by the DEA or DOJ?

Historical spending patterns for similar maintenance and installation services by the DEA or DOJ would reveal trends in contract values, durations, and types of services procured. Analyzing past contracts for engineering services, communication system maintenance, and IT infrastructure support can provide context for the $28.1 million award. For instance, if the DEA has consistently awarded multi-million dollar contracts to Motorola Solutions or similar vendors for these types of services over the years, it indicates a sustained and significant requirement. Conversely, a sudden increase in spending could signal new technology adoption or expanded operational needs. Understanding these patterns helps in evaluating whether the current contract aligns with historical procurement strategies and budget allocations for essential support services.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 809 PINNACLE DR STE G, LINTHICUM HEIGHTS, MD, 21090

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $30,266,796

Exercised Options: $30,266,796

Current Obligation: $28,122,302

Actual Outlays: $29,829,176

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 70B04C19D00000035

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline