DOJ awards $2.56M contract for residential care services in Connecticut

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,563,373 ($2.6M)

Contractor: Community Solutions, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2025-12-01

End Date: 2026-11-30

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: RRC SERVICES LOCATED IN BLOOMFIELD, CONNECTICUT.

Place of Performance

Location: WINDSOR, HARTFORD County, CONNECTICUT, 06095

State: Connecticut Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $2.6 million to COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS, INC. for work described as: RRC SERVICES LOCATED IN BLOOMFIELD, CONNECTICUT. Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for the duration and scope of services. 2. Full and open competition suggests a competitive bidding process. 3. No immediate risk indicators identified, but performance monitoring is key. 4. Services align with the Federal Prison System's mission to provide care. 5. This contract falls within the 'Other Residential Care Facilities' NAICS code. 6. The fixed-price contract type shifts performance risk to the contractor.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $2.56 million over one year for residential care services in Connecticut appears to be within a reasonable range when benchmarked against similar federal contracts for facility management and inmate support. The firm fixed-price structure indicates that the contractor assumes the risk for cost overruns, which is generally favorable for the government. Without specific per-unit cost data or detailed service level agreements, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging, but the overall award seems competitive given the scope.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. This method typically fosters a competitive environment, encouraging multiple bidders to offer their best pricing and service proposals. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a robust competition that should lead to fair market pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: A competitive bidding process helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by driving down costs and encouraging innovation from contractors.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are individuals requiring residential care services, likely inmates or individuals under correctional supervision. The services delivered include 'Other Residential Care Facilities' operations, encompassing housing, support, and potentially rehabilitation services. The geographic impact is concentrated in Connecticut, specifically where the services are located. Workforce implications include job creation for support staff, administrators, and service providers within the contracted facility.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for service quality variations if performance metrics are not strictly enforced.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical residential care services.
Geographic concentration of services could limit options in emergencies.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract shifts cost risk to the contractor.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive award process.
Contract duration provides stability for service delivery.
Contractor's location in Connecticut may facilitate local oversight and response.

Sector Analysis

The 'Other Residential Care Facilities' sector (NAICS 623990) encompasses establishments primarily engaged in providing residential care services, excluding those where residents receive extensive medical care. This includes facilities like halfway houses, group homes, and correctional halfway houses. Federal spending in this sector often supports correctional systems, social services, and transitional housing programs. Benchmarks for comparable spending would involve analyzing contracts for similar services provided to federal agencies like the Bureau of Prisons or other correctional entities.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). As a result, large businesses likely competed for and were awarded this contract. There is no information provided regarding subcontracting plans, so the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is not specified, though large prime contractors are often encouraged or required to subcontract with small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Justice's Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons. Accountability measures are typically embedded within the contract's performance standards and delivery requirements. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Federal Prison System Operations
Community Corrections Programs
Residential Reentry Centers
Department of Justice Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for service quality variability.
Dependence on contractor performance.
Geographic concentration risk.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $2.6 million to COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS, INC.. RRC SERVICES LOCATED IN BLOOMFIELD, CONNECTICUT.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is COMMUNITY SOLUTIONS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-12-01. End: 2026-11-30.

What is the track record of Community Solutions, Inc. in providing similar residential care services to federal agencies?

A thorough review of Community Solutions, Inc.'s contract history with federal agencies, particularly the Department of Justice and the Bureau of Prisons, would be necessary to assess their track record. This would involve examining past performance evaluations, any documented instances of contract non-compliance, and their experience with similar scopes of work and patient populations. Understanding their history with firm fixed-price contracts and their ability to meet performance standards consistently is crucial for evaluating their reliability on this new award. Without access to specific performance data or past contract details, it is difficult to definitively assess their track record.

How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar residential care facilities in Connecticut?

To benchmark the awarded price of $2.56 million against market rates, one would need to gather data on comparable residential care facilities in Connecticut. This includes identifying facilities with similar bed capacity, service offerings (e.g., counseling, job placement assistance, medical support), and security levels. Researching publicly available contract awards from state and local government agencies, as well as private sector contracts, for similar services in the same geographic region would provide a basis for comparison. Analyzing the cost per diem or cost per resident per month for these comparable facilities would allow for a more precise assessment of whether the DOJ contract represents good value for money.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and service level agreements (SLAs) associated with this contract?

The specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Service Level Agreements (SLAs) for this contract are not detailed in the provided data. However, for residential care facilities, typical KPIs often include metrics related to resident safety and security, successful program completion rates, recidivism rates post-release, resident satisfaction, and timely provision of services such as meals, healthcare access, and counseling. SLAs would define the expected quality and timeliness of these services. The effectiveness of the contract hinges on robust KPIs and SLAs that are measurable, achievable, and aligned with the Bureau of Prisons' objectives for inmate rehabilitation and management.

What is the historical spending pattern for residential care services by the Federal Prison System?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for residential care services by the Federal Prison System (FPS) would involve examining contract data over several fiscal years. This would reveal trends in contract values, the number of contracts awarded, the types of services procured, and the geographic distribution of these services. Understanding whether spending has increased, decreased, or remained stable can provide context for the current $2.56 million award. It would also highlight any shifts in procurement strategies, such as a move towards full and open competition or increased reliance on specific types of residential facilities. This historical perspective is vital for assessing the long-term budgetary implications and the strategic importance of such contracts.

Are there any specific risks associated with the 'Other Residential Care Facilities' NAICS code or the contractor's location in Connecticut?

Risks associated with the 'Other Residential Care Facilities' NAICS code can include challenges in maintaining consistent service quality, managing diverse resident needs, ensuring adequate staffing levels, and adhering to evolving regulatory requirements. Contractor-specific risks depend on their operational history and financial stability. For a contractor located in Connecticut, potential risks might include higher labor costs compared to other regions, specific state regulations that could impact operations, or localized economic factors. The concentration of services in one state also presents a risk if unforeseen events (e.g., natural disasters, public health emergencies) disrupt operations, potentially impacting the continuity of care for federal inmates.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Health Care and Social Assistance › Other Residential Care Facilities › Other Residential Care Facilities

Product/Service Code: SOCIAL SERVICES › SOCIAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 340 W NEWBERRY RD, BLOOMFIELD, CT, 06002

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,563,373

Exercised Options: $2,563,373

Current Obligation: $2,563,373

Actual Outlays: $377,912

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NOT OBTAINED - WAIVED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15BRRC20D00000113

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline