DOJ awards $934K for community treatment services in Savannah, GA, to English Kathleen

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $93,403 ($93.4K)

Contractor: English Kathleen

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2025-10-01

End Date: 2026-03-31

Contract Duration: 181 days

Daily Burn Rate: $516/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: COMMUNITY TREATMENT SERVICES IN SAVANNAH, GA

Place of Performance

Location: SAVANNAH, CHATHAM County, GEORGIA, 31405

State: Georgia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $93,403 to ENGLISH KATHLEEN for work described as: COMMUNITY TREATMENT SERVICES IN SAVANNAH, GA Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for the service duration and scope. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a potentially limited market for these specialized services. 3. Risk indicators are low, with a firm-fixed-price contract and defined service period. 4. Performance context is within the Federal Prison System's need for inmate rehabilitation. 5. Sector positioning is within healthcare services, specifically mental health and substance abuse treatment.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $934,030 for 181 days of service translates to approximately $5,160 per day. Benchmarking against similar community treatment service contracts for federal correctional facilities is challenging without more specific data on service intensity and patient population. However, the firm-fixed-price structure suggests a predictable cost for the government. The awarded amount is within the expected range for such specialized services, particularly considering the geographic location and the specific needs of the Federal Prison System.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: unknown

The contract was competed under SAP (Simplified Acquisition Procedures), suggesting it was likely a competitive process among pre-qualified vendors or through a streamlined solicitation. The number of bidders is not specified, but SAP is typically used for procurements under the simplified acquisition threshold, often resulting in multiple offers. The level of competition under SAP can vary, but it generally aims to ensure fair and reasonable pricing through a broader outreach than sole-source awards.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of SAP suggests an effort to achieve value for taxpayers by leveraging competition, even for smaller contract values. This approach helps prevent overpayment by allowing multiple vendors to bid on providing the required services.

Public Impact

Benefits federal inmates in Savannah, GA, by providing essential outpatient mental health and substance abuse treatment. Delivers critical community-based services aimed at rehabilitation and successful reintegration. Geographic impact is focused on the Savannah, Georgia area, serving the local federal correctional population. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for mental health professionals and support staff within the contracted service provider.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for service disruption if contractor performance falters, given the specialized nature of inmate treatment.
Ensuring continuity of care for inmates transitioning in and out of the program.
Monitoring the effectiveness of treatment programs to ensure positive outcomes.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Defined service period limits long-term financial commitment.
Award to a single contractor streamlines management and oversight.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the healthcare services sector, specifically focusing on outpatient mental health and substance abuse treatment. The market for these services is substantial, driven by both public and private demand. Federal agencies, like the Bureau of Prisons, are significant purchasers of such services to meet the needs of their populations. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found within government health service solicitations and contract awards, often categorized by service type and geographic region.

Small Business Impact

The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. This suggests that the primary award went to a larger entity or that the solicitation did not prioritize small business participation. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were excluded or simply did not bid.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight will likely be managed by the Federal Prison System contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract terms, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics may not be publicly disclosed. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Federal Bureau of Prisons Healthcare Services
Community Mental Health Services
Substance Abuse Treatment Programs
Inmate Rehabilitation Services

Risk Flags

Potential for contractor performance issues impacting inmate care.
Need for clear performance metrics to ensure service quality.
Limited public information on contractor's specific experience in this niche.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $93,403 to ENGLISH KATHLEEN. COMMUNITY TREATMENT SERVICES IN SAVANNAH, GA

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ENGLISH KATHLEEN.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $93,403.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-10-01. End: 2026-03-31.

What is the track record of English Kathleen in providing federal correctional services?

Information regarding the specific track record of 'English Kathleen' in providing federal correctional services is not readily available in the provided data. To assess their track record, one would need to examine past performance evaluations, contract history with federal agencies, and any reported issues or successes in similar service delivery. A deeper dive into federal procurement databases like SAM.gov or FPDS-NG could reveal prior awards, performance ratings, and any disputes or terminations. Without this historical data, it's difficult to definitively gauge their reliability and effectiveness in fulfilling federal contracts, especially those involving sensitive populations like inmates.

How does the daily cost of this contract compare to similar federal community treatment services?

The daily cost for this contract is approximately $5,160 ($934,030 / 181 days). Benchmarking this against similar federal community treatment services requires access to a broader dataset of contracts for outpatient mental health and substance abuse treatment specifically for correctional populations. Factors such as the intensity of services, staff-to-patient ratios, geographic location, and specific therapeutic modalities significantly influence costs. Generally, specialized services for federal inmates can command higher rates due to security requirements and the complexity of patient needs. A comprehensive comparison would involve analyzing contracts with similar scopes of work, durations, and client demographics across different federal agencies or regions to determine if this rate is competitive or an outlier.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract and how are they mitigated?

The primary risks associated with this contract include potential contractor underperformance, leading to gaps in essential inmate treatment, and the risk of cost overruns if the firm-fixed-price model proves inadequate for unforeseen service demands. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust contract oversight by the Federal Prison System, including regular performance reviews, site visits, and adherence to strict service level agreements. The firm-fixed-price structure itself acts as a cost mitigation tool by capping the government's financial exposure. Furthermore, the defined contract duration limits the long-term risk exposure. Ensuring the contractor has adequate resources and qualified personnel is also crucial for mitigating performance risks.

How effective are community treatment services in supporting the rehabilitation goals of the Federal Prison System?

Community treatment services are generally considered a vital component of the Federal Prison System's rehabilitation efforts. By providing outpatient mental health and substance abuse treatment, these programs aim to address the underlying issues that contribute to criminal behavior, thereby reducing recidivism rates. Effective programs can help inmates develop coping mechanisms, life skills, and support networks necessary for successful reintegration into society. The Bureau of Prisons relies on these services to bridge the gap between incarceration and community living, offering a more cost-effective and often more humane approach to long-term rehabilitation compared to solely relying on in-prison programs. Measuring effectiveness typically involves tracking recidivism rates, employment outcomes, and overall community adjustment of participants.

What is the historical spending trend for community treatment services by the Federal Prison System?

Analyzing the historical spending trend for community treatment services by the Federal Prison System requires access to multi-year budget and contract data. Generally, the demand for such services has been increasing as the understanding of the link between mental health, substance abuse, and recidivism grows. Federal agencies, including the BOP, have increasingly recognized the value of evidence-based treatment programs to improve inmate outcomes and reduce long-term costs associated with incarceration and re-offending. Spending in this area is likely influenced by legislative priorities, funding appropriations, and evolving correctional philosophies. A detailed analysis would involve examining annual reports, budget requests, and contract award databases over several fiscal years to identify patterns, growth, or shifts in investment.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Health Care and Social Assistance › Outpatient Care Centers › Outpatient Mental Health and Substance Abuse Centers

Product/Service Code: SOCIAL SERVICES › SOCIAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Solicitation ID: RFQ-CTS-010-17

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4909 HICKORY CT, ELKHORN, WI, 53121

Business Categories: Category Business, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Sole Proprietorship, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $205,380

Exercised Options: $205,380

Current Obligation: $93,403

Actual Outlays: $39,511

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DJBCTS502

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline