DOJ's $10.3M UNICOR vest BPA with Federal Prison Industries offers value, but limited competition raises questions
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $10,269 ($10.3K)
Contractor: Federal Prison Industries, Inc
Awarding Agency: Department of Justice
Start Date: 2026-04-10
End Date: 2026-06-12
Contract Duration: 63 days
Daily Burn Rate: $163/day
Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: FY24 UNICOR OUTER VEST BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (BPA) 15BNAS22A00000074 WITH FEDERAL PRISON INDUSTRIES, INC. (UNICOR)
Place of Performance
Location: LEXINGTON, FAYETTE County, KENTUCKY, 40511
State: Kentucky Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Justice obligated $10,269.18 to FEDERAL PRISON INDUSTRIES, INC for work described as: FY24 UNICOR OUTER VEST BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (BPA) 15BNAS22A00000074 WITH FEDERAL PRISON INDUSTRIES, INC. (UNICOR) Key points: 1. The contract leverages Federal Prison Industries (UNICOR) for vest manufacturing, aligning with its mission to provide inmate employment and vocational training. 2. While the contract is a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) call, the underlying competition method for the BPA itself is not detailed, impacting price discovery. 3. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government. 4. The duration of the contract is relatively short, suggesting potential for future re-competition or adjustments. 5. The geographic location of performance in Kentucky may have implications for logistics and regional economic impact. 6. The contract's reliance on a single source for manufacturing raises potential concerns about long-term price competitiveness and innovation.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
This Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) call with Federal Prison Industries (UNICOR) for outer vests appears to be priced competitively within the context of UNICOR's mission. However, without direct comparisons to commercial market pricing for similar vest specifications or details on the initial competition for the BPA, a definitive value-for-money assessment is challenging. The firm fixed-price nature offers predictability, but the lack of broader market benchmarking limits the ability to confirm optimal pricing.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: unknown
The provided data indicates the contract was 'COMPETED UNDER SAP' (Simplified Acquisition Procedures), and it is a BPA call. However, the specific competition details for the establishment of the underlying BPA are not fully disclosed. It is unclear if the BPA itself was competed broadly or if this call was awarded under pre-existing terms. The limited information suggests that while some level of competition may have occurred, it might not have been full and open, potentially impacting the breadth of bids received and price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: The level of competition for this contract is crucial for taxpayers. If the BPA was not widely competed, there's a risk that the government may not be securing the most cost-effective pricing available in the market, potentially leading to higher expenditures than necessary.
Public Impact
The primary beneficiaries are the Federal Prison System and Bureau of Prisons, receiving essential outer vests for their operations. The contract supports the mission of Federal Prison Industries (UNICOR) by providing employment and vocational training opportunities for inmates. The services delivered are the manufacturing and supply of men's and boys' outer vests. Performance is located in Kentucky, potentially impacting the regional economy through UNICOR's operations there.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Limited competition for the BPA could lead to suboptimal pricing for taxpayers.
- Reliance on a single entity (UNICOR) may reduce flexibility and responsiveness to evolving needs.
- Lack of transparency in the initial BPA competition makes a thorough value assessment difficult.
Positive Signals
- Supports the congressionally mandated mission of UNICOR to employ inmates.
- Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
- The contract is a BPA call, suggesting a pre-established framework that can streamline future procurements.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the apparel manufacturing sector, specifically men's and boys' cut and sew apparel. Federal Prison Industries (UNICOR) is a unique entity within this sector, operating as a government corporation with a social mission. While the overall apparel market is vast and highly competitive, UNICOR's role as a supplier to federal agencies operates under different dynamics. Benchmarking against commercial spending in this specific niche is challenging due to UNICOR's distinct operational model and mandate.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to involve small business set-asides, as it is awarded to Federal Prison Industries, Inc. (UNICOR). There is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses within the provided data. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal, as the primary awardee is a federal entity.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Justice and the Federal Prison System's internal procurement and contract management processes. As UNICOR is a government-owned entity, its operations are subject to federal regulations and oversight. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, but detailed performance metrics and ongoing oversight mechanisms beyond standard contract administration are not explicitly detailed in the provided data.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Prison Industries (UNICOR) procurements
- Bureau of Prisons operational support contracts
- Apparel and textile manufacturing contracts
- Department of Justice supply chain management
Risk Flags
- Limited competition potential
- Reliance on a single source (UNICOR)
- Potential for price variability compared to open market
Tags
apparel-manufacturing, department-of-justice, federal-prison-system, blanket-purchase-agreement, firm-fixed-price, competed-under-sap, unicor, mens-and-boys-apparel, kentucky, medium-value
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Justice awarded $10,269.18 to FEDERAL PRISON INDUSTRIES, INC. FY24 UNICOR OUTER VEST BLANKET PURCHASE AGREEMENT (BPA) 15BNAS22A00000074 WITH FEDERAL PRISON INDUSTRIES, INC. (UNICOR)
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is FEDERAL PRISON INDUSTRIES, INC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $10,269.18.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2026-04-10. End: 2026-06-12.
What is the historical spending pattern for similar outer vest procurements by the Federal Prison System?
Analyzing historical spending for similar outer vest procurements by the Federal Prison System (FPS) is crucial for understanding cost trends and value. While specific data for 'outer vests' is not readily available in aggregated public databases without further refinement, general trends in apparel and uniform procurement by correctional facilities can be inferred. Historically, agencies like the FPS have relied on a mix of competitive bidding and, at times, sole-source or limited-source awards, including those with Federal Prison Industries (UNICOR). Spending can fluctuate based on inmate population, security requirements, and the lifecycle of uniform items. Without granular historical data on vest procurements, it's difficult to establish a precise benchmark, but the current $10.3M BPA call suggests a significant, ongoing need for this specific item. Future analysis should focus on isolating vest-specific spending and comparing it against inflation-adjusted market rates to identify any deviations.
How does the pricing of these UNICOR-sourced vests compare to commercially available alternatives, considering quality and specifications?
Comparing the pricing of vests procured through UNICOR to commercially available alternatives requires a detailed analysis of specifications, materials, and quality standards. UNICOR's pricing is influenced by its mission to provide inmate labor and vocational training, which may differ from the cost structures of private sector manufacturers focused solely on profit maximization. While UNICOR aims for fair market pricing, direct comparisons are often challenging due to proprietary manufacturing processes and the unique social objectives. To assess value, one would need to obtain identical or highly comparable commercial vest specifications and solicit quotes from multiple private sector vendors. Factors such as durability, material composition (e.g., ballistic protection levels if applicable, though unlikely for 'outer vests'), and manufacturing quality would need to be rigorously matched. Without such a detailed side-by-side comparison, it's difficult to definitively state whether the UNICOR pricing represents superior or inferior value relative to the commercial market.
What are the specific risks associated with relying on Federal Prison Industries (UNICOR) for critical supplies like vests?
Relying on Federal Prison Industries (UNICOR) for critical supplies like vests presents several potential risks. Firstly, there's a risk of limited competition, as UNICOR often operates under specific legislative mandates that may restrict broader market solicitation, potentially leading to less favorable pricing or innovation compared to a fully open market. Secondly, supply chain disruptions could occur if UNICOR faces internal operational challenges, such as labor availability (inmate workforce fluctuations), material shortages, or facility issues, which could impact delivery timelines. Thirdly, the pace of technological adoption or material innovation might be slower within UNICOR compared to agile private sector companies constantly seeking market advantages. Finally, while UNICOR aims for quality, the consistency of manufacturing output can be a concern due to the transient nature of the inmate workforce, potentially requiring more rigorous quality assurance checks by the procuring agency.
What is the track record of Federal Prison Industries (UNICOR) in fulfilling similar apparel contracts for federal agencies?
Federal Prison Industries (UNICOR) has a long-standing track record of fulfilling apparel and manufacturing contracts for various federal agencies, including the Department of Justice, Department of Defense, and others. Its mandate is to provide employment and job skills training to inmates incarcerated in federal prisons. Historically, UNICOR has supplied a wide range of products, from office furniture and textiles to electronic equipment repair and apparel. While generally considered reliable in meeting its contractual obligations, performance can vary. Past performance reviews and contract data sometimes indicate challenges related to delivery timelines, product consistency, or responsiveness, often linked to the complexities of managing an inmate workforce and production facilities. However, for many agencies, UNICOR remains a go-to source due to its unique mission alignment and established capabilities in specific product categories like apparel.
How does the 'COMPETED UNDER SAP' designation for this BPA call influence the overall cost-effectiveness for the government?
The 'COMPETED UNDER SAP' (Simplified Acquisition Procedures) designation for this Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) call indicates that the procurement likely fell within the simplified acquisition threshold (typically $250,000, though this can be adjusted). SAP is designed to streamline the purchasing process for smaller value acquisitions, making it faster and less burdensome than full-scale competitive procedures. While this can lead to quicker delivery of goods and services, it often involves less formal solicitation processes, potentially fewer bidders, and less extensive documentation compared to larger, more complex procurements. For this specific BPA call, it suggests that the individual order placed under the BPA was competed using these simplified rules. The cost-effectiveness hinges on whether SAP procedures, in this instance, still allowed for adequate price competition among eligible vendors or if it was a limited competition among pre-qualified entities. Without knowing the specific SAP method used (e.g., RFQ to multiple vendors vs. limited sources), it's hard to definitively gauge the impact on cost-effectiveness.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Cut and Sew Apparel Manufacturing › Men’s and Boys’ Cut and Sew Apparel Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: CLOTHING, INDIVIDUAL EQUIPMENT, INSIGNA, AND JEWELRY
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP
Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Government of the United States
Address: 3301 LEESTOWN RD, LEXINGTON, KY, 40511
Business Categories: Category Business, Government, U.S. National Government, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $10,269
Exercised Options: $10,269
Current Obligation: $10,269
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 15BNAS22A00000074
IDV Type: BPA
Timeline
Start Date: 2026-04-10
Current End Date: 2026-06-12
Potential End Date: 2026-06-12 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-10
More Contracts from Federal Prison Industries, Inc
- 200509!005033!2100!w15p7t!usa Communications-Electronics !w15p7t05f0073 !A!N! !N! ! !20050629!20070228!624770475!626627459!626627459!y!unicor, Federal Prison Industr!320 1ST Street, N W !washington !dc!20534!50000!001!11!washington !district of Columbia !D.C. !+000097357327!n!n!000000000000!5985!antennas, Waveguides & Related Equipment !A7 !electronics and Communication Equip !000 !* !334290!E! !8! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $172.3M (Department of Defense)
- 200608!005038!2100!w15p7t!usa Communications-Electronics !w15p7t06dk210 !A!N! !N!0001 ! !20060615!20080614!624770475!626627459!626627459!y!unicor, Federal Prison Industr!320 1ST Street, N W !washington !dc!20534!50000!001!11!washington !district of Columbia !D.C. !+000045363716!n!n!000000000000!5340!miscellaneous Hardware !A7 !electronics and Communication Equip !000 !NOT Discernable !334220!E! !5!B!S! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $45.4M (Department of Defense)
- Letter Contract With Federal Prisons Industries to Procure Sincgars Installation Kits — $43.4M (Department of Defense)
- 200611!007165!2100!w15p7t!usa Communications-Electronics !w15p7t06f0045 !A!N! !N! ! !20060821!20071231!624770475!626627459!626627459!y!federal Prison Industries Inc !320 1ST ST NW !washington !dc!20534!50000!001!11!washington !district of Columbia !D.C. !+000009969333!n!n!000000000000!5935!connectors, Electrical !A7 !electronics and Communication Equip !000 !NOT Discernable !334220!E! !8! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $19.6M (Department of Defense)
- N/A — $16.1M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Justice Contracts
- Contractor Owned and Operated Existing Correctional Facility for Approximately 3,500 LOW Security Male Inmates — $794.5M (Cornell Companies, Inc.)
- Detention Services - SAN Diego — $776.9M (THE GEO Group, Inc.)
- CO: Telly Renfroe Award of NEW Task Order Base Year Initial Funding — $616.4M (AT&T Enterprises, LLC)
- TAS 151060 - Services for the Management and Operation of a Contractor-Owned, Contractor-Operated, Correctional Facility for 2,567 Beds in Adams County, Mississippi — $574.3M (Corecivic, Inc.)
- Provide Services for the Management and Operation of a Correctional Facility in Accordance With Rfp-Pcc-0014 — $568.9M (Cornell Companies, Inc.)