DOJ's $1.45M Medical Dispensing Contract Awarded to Four Points Technology for Federal Prisons

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $145,027 ($145.0K)

Contractor: Four Points Technology, L.L.C.

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2025-10-01

End Date: 2026-09-30

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $398/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: FY26 FOUR POINTS - MED DISPENSE CR OCTOBER 01, 2025 - JANUARY 30, 2026

Place of Performance

Location: FORT WORTH, TARRANT County, TEXAS, 76119

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $145,026.6 to FOUR POINTS TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C. for work described as: FY26 FOUR POINTS - MED DISPENSE CR OCTOBER 01, 2025 - JANUARY 30, 2026 Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract is for medical dispensing equipment, a critical need within correctional facilities. 3. Fixed-price contract type helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the government. 4. The duration of 364 days indicates a short-term need or a bridge to a larger contract. 5. The award to a single vendor, Four Points Technology, warrants a review of pricing and performance. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 339112 points to a specialized manufacturing sector.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this $1.45 million contract requires more detailed cost breakdowns and comparisons to similar medical dispensing equipment procurements. Without specific unit pricing or a comparison to market rates for comparable equipment, it is difficult to definitively assess value for money. The firm fixed-price structure is a positive indicator for cost control, but the overall value is contingent on the quality and suitability of the equipment provided.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES,' which indicates that the solicitation was broadly advertised, and all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The specific mention of 'exclusion of sources' might suggest prior exclusions or a specific justification for limiting the pool, which warrants further investigation. The level of competition is not explicitly stated in terms of the number of bidders.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to lower prices and better quality goods and services.

Public Impact

Inmates within the Federal Prison System will benefit from access to necessary medical dispensing equipment. The contract ensures the availability of critical medical supplies and devices for patient care. The primary geographic impact is within federal correctional facilities, likely across Texas given the 'TX' state code. The contract supports the healthcare workforce within federal prisons by providing essential tools.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific details on the number of bidders in the full and open competition.
The 'exclusion of sources' clause requires clarification to understand its implications.
No explicit mention of small business subcontracting goals or achievements.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, promoting market access.
Firm Fixed Price contract type helps control costs.
Addresses a critical need for medical equipment in federal correctional facilities.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing sector, specifically related to surgical and medical instruments. The NAICS code 339112 covers establishments primarily engaged in manufacturing medical, surgical, and dental instruments and related supplies. Spending in this sector is driven by healthcare demand, including specialized needs within institutional settings like correctional facilities.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses arising from a set-aside. However, the prime contractor, Four Points Technology, may engage small businesses as subcontractors, but this is not specified in the provided data.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) within the Department of Justice. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract type, which obligates the contractor to deliver specified goods at an agreed-upon price. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics may not always be publicly available. Inspector General oversight would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Federal Prison System Medical Supplies
Bureau of Prisons Equipment Procurement
Medical Device Manufacturing Contracts
Correctional Healthcare Services

Risk Flags

Potential for supply chain disruptions affecting delivery.
Risk of equipment non-compliance with specifications.
Unclear competition dynamics due to 'exclusion of sources' clause.
Dependence on a single vendor for critical medical supplies.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $145,026.6 to FOUR POINTS TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C.. FY26 FOUR POINTS - MED DISPENSE CR OCTOBER 01, 2025 - JANUARY 30, 2026

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is FOUR POINTS TECHNOLOGY, L.L.C..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $145,026.6.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-10-01. End: 2026-09-30.

What is the track record of Four Points Technology with the Federal Prison System or similar agencies?

A review of federal procurement data would be necessary to ascertain Four Points Technology's past performance with the Federal Prison System (FPS) and the Bureau of Prisons (BOP). This would involve examining prior contracts, their values, durations, and any performance evaluations or disputes. Understanding their history with similar government agencies, particularly those requiring medical equipment for institutional settings, would also provide valuable context. A strong performance history with relevant agencies suggests a lower risk of delivery or quality issues for this current contract. Conversely, a history of issues could indicate potential risks that warrant closer monitoring.

How does the pricing of this contract compare to similar medical dispensing equipment procurements?

To compare the pricing, one would need to identify comparable contracts for medical dispensing equipment awarded by the Federal Prison System or other federal agencies over a similar timeframe. This would involve analyzing contract awards for the same or similar equipment, considering factors like quantity, specifications, and contract type. Benchmarking the per-unit cost or the total contract value against these comparables would reveal whether this $1.45 million award represents a fair and reasonable price. Without access to detailed pricing data for this specific award and comparable contracts, a definitive value assessment is challenging.

What are the specific risks associated with this contract, given its nature and the contractor?

Potential risks for this contract include the possibility of equipment malfunction or failure, leading to disruptions in medical services for inmates. There's also a risk related to the contractor's ability to meet delivery schedules and quality standards. Given that it's a firm fixed-price contract, the risk of cost overruns is primarily on the contractor, but if they fail to deliver, the government may face delays and the cost of re-procurement. The 'exclusion of sources' in the competition type warrants investigation to ensure no undue restrictions limited potential competition, which could indirectly impact value.

How effective is the Federal Prison System in procuring and managing medical equipment contracts?

The effectiveness of the Federal Prison System (FPS) in procuring and managing medical equipment contracts can be assessed by examining contract performance data, audit reports from the Inspector General, and inmate health outcome statistics. Consistent on-time delivery, adherence to specifications, and positive performance reviews would indicate effective procurement and management. Conversely, frequent contract disputes, delays, or reports of inadequate equipment suggest areas for improvement. The BOP's ability to secure competitive pricing and ensure the reliability of essential medical supplies is crucial for inmate welfare and operational efficiency.

What are the historical spending patterns for medical dispensing equipment within the Department of Justice?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for medical dispensing equipment within the Department of Justice (DOJ) would involve reviewing procurement data over several fiscal years. This would reveal the total amount spent annually, the primary contractors, the types of equipment procured, and the contract vehicles used (e.g., GSA schedules, direct solicitations). Understanding these patterns can help identify trends, potential increases or decreases in demand, and whether spending is concentrated with a few vendors or distributed across many. Such analysis is vital for budget forecasting, identifying potential cost-saving opportunities, and assessing the overall strategy for acquiring essential medical equipment.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing › Surgical and Medical Instrument Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - END USER

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: 15BPCC25Q00000025

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 13221 WOODLAND PARK RD, HERNDON, VA, 20171

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $145,027

Exercised Options: $145,027

Current Obligation: $145,027

Actual Outlays: $36,257

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 15BPCC25D00000025

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline