DOJ's $98K electric service contract for April 2026 awarded to American Electric Power Company, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $98,271 ($98.3K)
Contractor: American Electric Power Company, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Justice
Start Date: 2026-04-01
End Date: 2026-04-30
Contract Duration: 29 days
Daily Burn Rate: $3.4K/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Energy
Official Description: FY26 P4 - AEP ELECTRIC SERVICE APRIL 2026
Place of Performance
Location: INEZ, MARTIN County, KENTUCKY, 41224
State: Kentucky Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Justice obligated $98,271.16 to AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC. for work described as: FY26 P4 - AEP ELECTRIC SERVICE APRIL 2026 Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for a single month of electric service. 2. Limited competition due to the nature of utility services. 3. Risk indicators are low given the essential service provided. 4. Performance context is a short-term, single-month delivery order. 5. Sector positioning is within essential utility services for federal facilities.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $98,271.16 for one month of electric service is benchmarked against typical utility rates. While specific per-unit costs for electricity are not provided, the total amount seems aligned with the expected expenses for a federal facility of significant size. Without more granular data on energy consumption or historical spending for this specific location, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging, but the price does not appear excessive for a month's supply of electricity.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
This contract was awarded as 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION,' indicating a sole-source or limited competition scenario. Electric utility services are typically provided by a single entity within a specific geographic area, making full and open competition impractical or impossible. The lack of multiple bidders is inherent to the nature of the service, not necessarily a failure of the procurement process.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers are served by ensuring continuous and reliable power to federal facilities, which is a non-negotiable requirement. The cost is likely determined by regulated utility rates, minimizing opportunities for price negotiation.
Public Impact
The Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons benefits from reliable electricity. Essential electric power services are delivered to a federal facility in Kentucky. Geographic impact is localized to the facility in Kentucky. Workforce implications are minimal, as this is a service contract for utility provision.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for price fluctuations in energy markets not fully mitigated by fixed-price contract.
- Dependence on a single utility provider could pose a risk if service is interrupted.
Positive Signals
- Ensures essential service continuity for a federal facility.
- Contract is for a short duration, limiting long-term exposure to market volatility.
- Awarded to a known utility provider with established infrastructure.
Sector Analysis
The energy sector, specifically electric power distribution, is a critical infrastructure component. Federal agencies rely heavily on utility providers to maintain operations. This contract represents a small portion of the overall federal spending on utilities, which is a recurring and essential expenditure across numerous agencies and facilities nationwide. Benchmarking this specific contract is difficult without knowing the exact energy consumption of the facility.
Small Business Impact
This contract does not appear to involve small business set-asides, as it is awarded to a large utility company. There is no indication of subcontracting opportunities for small businesses within this specific delivery order for electric service.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would fall under the Department of Justice's Federal Prison System. Accountability measures are inherent in the delivery of essential services; failure to provide power would have immediate operational consequences. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases, though specific performance metrics for utility services are often standard operational requirements rather than contract-specific deliverables.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Energy Management Program
- Utility Services Contracts
- Department of Justice Facility Operations
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award limits price competition.
- Potential for price volatility in energy markets.
Tags
energy, utility-services, department-of-justice, federal-prison-system, delivery-order, firm-fixed-price, sole-source, kentucky, essential-services
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Justice awarded $98,271.16 to AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC.. FY26 P4 - AEP ELECTRIC SERVICE APRIL 2026
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Prison System / Bureau of Prisons).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $98,271.16.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2026-04-01. End: 2026-04-30.
What is the historical spending pattern for electric services at this specific federal facility?
Analyzing historical spending for electric services at this specific federal facility would provide crucial context for evaluating the current contract's value. Without access to past contract data (e.g., previous delivery orders or base contracts for the same facility), it is difficult to determine if the $98,271.16 for April 2026 represents an increase, decrease, or stable cost compared to previous periods. Factors such as changes in energy consumption, fluctuating market rates, and contract terms (fixed-price vs. cost-reimbursable) can significantly impact year-over-year spending. A trend analysis of historical data would reveal if this contract is in line with established spending patterns or if further investigation into price drivers is warranted.
How does the per-kilowatt-hour cost compare to national averages for commercial or industrial electricity rates?
A direct comparison of the per-kilowatt-hour (kWh) cost for this contract to national averages for commercial or industrial electricity rates would offer a valuable benchmark. However, the provided data does not include the total kilowatt-hours to be supplied, making a precise per-kWh calculation impossible. If such data were available, it could be compared against figures from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) or other industry sources. Federal facilities often have unique consumption patterns and may be subject to different rate structures than typical commercial entities. Therefore, while national averages provide a general reference, the specific rate structure negotiated with the utility provider for this facility is the most relevant comparison point.
What are the specific energy consumption needs of the facility that this contract is intended to cover?
The specific energy consumption needs of the facility are not detailed in the provided contract data. This contract covers 'Electric Power Distribution' for April 2026, implying it's for the provision of electricity. Understanding the facility's peak demand, average daily usage, and the types of operations requiring power (e.g., administrative, housing, specialized equipment) would be essential for a comprehensive assessment. This information would allow for a more accurate estimation of the expected kilowatt-hour usage and, consequently, a better evaluation of the contract's value for money. Without this context, the $98,271.16 is a total cost figure without a clear understanding of the volume of service it represents.
What is American Electric Power Company, Inc.'s track record with federal government contracts, particularly for utility services?
American Electric Power Company, Inc. (AEP) is a major utility provider with a significant presence in several states. While specific details on their track record with federal government contracts are not provided in this data snippet, large utility companies typically have established processes for serving government entities. Their experience would likely involve navigating government procurement regulations and meeting service level agreements. A deeper dive into AEP's contract history with federal agencies, including performance reviews and any past issues, would offer insight into their reliability and adherence to contractual obligations. However, for essential services like electricity, established providers are often chosen for their existing infrastructure and regulatory compliance.
Are there any alternative energy sources or providers that could have been considered for this facility?
The feasibility of considering alternative energy sources or providers for this facility depends heavily on its geographic location and existing infrastructure. As this contract is with American Electric Power Company, Inc. for 'Electric Power Distribution,' it implies reliance on the established grid infrastructure managed by AEP in that region. Exploring alternative sources like on-site solar generation or other renewable energy providers would require significant capital investment and infrastructure changes, which may not be feasible or cost-effective for a single-month service contract. The 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' status strongly suggests that, for the period specified, AEP was the sole viable provider through the existing distribution network.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Utilities › Electric Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution › Electric Power Distribution
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › UTILITIES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1, RIVERSIDE PLAZA, COLUMBUS, OH, 43215
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $98,271
Exercised Options: $98,271
Current Obligation: $98,271
Contract Characteristics
Multi-Year Contract: Yes
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 47PA0422D0063
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2026-04-01
Current End Date: 2026-04-30
Potential End Date: 2026-04-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-10
More Contracts from American Electric Power Company, Inc.
- Electrical Utility Service for Msha, Mine Academy, 1301 Airport RD., Beaver, WV 25813 for the Period 3/1/2020 - 2/28/2030 — $4.3M (Department of Labor)
- FCI Beckley Electric Q2 FY26 Contract #47PA0422D0063 — $271.4K (Department of Justice)
- FY26 P4 AEP Electric Service June 2026 — $100.0K (Department of Justice)
- FY26 P4 AEP Electric Service MAY 2026 — $100.0K (Department of Justice)
- Electric Service for Monacan Health Center — $67.5K (Department of Health and Human Services)
View all American Electric Power Company, Inc. federal contracts →
Other Department of Justice Contracts
- Contractor Owned and Operated Existing Correctional Facility for Approximately 3,500 LOW Security Male Inmates — $794.5M (Cornell Companies, Inc.)
- Detention Services - SAN Diego — $776.9M (THE GEO Group, Inc.)
- CO: Telly Renfroe Award of NEW Task Order Base Year Initial Funding — $616.4M (AT&T Enterprises, LLC)
- TAS 151060 - Services for the Management and Operation of a Contractor-Owned, Contractor-Operated, Correctional Facility for 2,567 Beds in Adams County, Mississippi — $574.3M (Corecivic, Inc.)
- Provide Services for the Management and Operation of a Correctional Facility in Accordance With Rfp-Pcc-0014 — $568.9M (Cornell Companies, Inc.)