Interior Department awards $2.57M construction BPA call to Project Solutions, Inc. for Arizona facilities
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $256,876 ($256.9K)
Contractor: Project Solutions, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of the Interior
Start Date: 2026-04-07
End Date: 2026-08-31
Contract Duration: 146 days
Daily Burn Rate: $1.8K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: GRCA 190083 250176 TCWL CMR BPA 08
Place of Performance
Location: GRAND CANYON, COCONINO County, ARIZONA, 86023
State: Arizona Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of the Interior obligated $256,876 to PROJECT SOLUTIONS, INC. for work described as: GRCA 190083 250176 TCWL CMR BPA 08 Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair given the fixed-price nature and duration, but detailed cost breakdowns are needed for a precise assessment. 2. The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment. 3. Risk indicators are moderate, with performance dependent on contractor execution and site conditions. 4. This contract supports facility maintenance and construction within the National Park Service's operational context. 5. Positioned within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, serving federal infrastructure needs.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's total value of $2.57 million for a 146-day period (approximately $17,590 per day) seems within a reasonable range for construction services. However, without specific details on the scope of work, it's difficult to benchmark against similar contracts. The firm-fixed-price structure shifts risk to the contractor, which can be beneficial for the government if costs are well-managed. Further analysis of the individual call orders would be necessary to assess true value for money.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. This method is generally expected to foster competitive pricing and allow the government to select the best value. The number of bidders is not specified, but the process itself suggests a healthy level of market interest.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition typically leads to more favorable pricing for taxpayers by encouraging multiple companies to bid competitively, driving down costs.
Public Impact
Benefits federal agencies operating facilities within Arizona, ensuring operational readiness and infrastructure integrity. Delivers essential construction and maintenance services for National Park Service properties. Geographic impact is concentrated in Arizona, supporting federal infrastructure in the state. Workforce implications include potential employment opportunities for construction labor in the local Arizona economy.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep in subsequent BPA call orders if not clearly defined.
- Dependence on contractor's ability to meet quality standards and timelines.
- Unforeseen site conditions in Arizona could impact project costs and schedules.
Positive Signals
- Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive market.
- Long-term nature of the BPA allows for streamlined procurement of future needs.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a broad category encompassing the building, alteration, and repair of non-residential structures. The federal government is a significant consumer of these services for maintaining its vast portfolio of buildings and infrastructure. Benchmarking against similar federal construction contracts of this size and scope would provide further context on pricing and efficiency.
Small Business Impact
The contract was not set aside for small businesses, and the data does not indicate any specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses. This suggests that larger firms were likely the primary participants in the competition. Further review of the contract terms would be needed to confirm subcontracting plans and their potential impact on the small business ecosystem.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight will be managed by the National Park Service, likely through contract officers and technical representatives who will monitor performance and approve call orders. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- National Park Service Facility Maintenance Contracts
- Federal Building Construction Services
- Construction and Engineering Services
- Base Operations Support Contracts
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if scope is not well-defined.
- Dependence on contractor's ability to meet quality and schedule requirements.
- Risk of unforeseen site conditions impacting project timeline and budget.
Tags
construction, department-of-the-interior, national-park-service, arizona, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, commercial-and-institutional-building-construction, bpa-call, facilities-maintenance
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of the Interior awarded $256,876 to PROJECT SOLUTIONS, INC.. GRCA 190083 250176 TCWL CMR BPA 08
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is PROJECT SOLUTIONS, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of the Interior (National Park Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $256,876.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2026-04-07. End: 2026-08-31.
What is the specific scope of work covered by this BPA call, and how does it compare to typical construction needs for National Park Service facilities?
The provided data indicates this is a BPA Call against a larger Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) for Commercial and Institutional Building Construction. The specific scope of work for this call order (GRCA 190083 250176 TCWL CMR BPA 08) is not detailed in the provided summary. However, typical construction needs for National Park Service facilities can range widely, including new construction, renovation of historic structures, utility upgrades, road and trail maintenance, and general repairs. Without the detailed statement of work for this specific call, a direct comparison to typical needs is not possible. The value of $2.57 million suggests a significant project, potentially a substantial renovation or a new facility component, rather than routine maintenance.
How does the $17,590 per day estimated cost for this contract benchmark against similar construction projects in Arizona or for federal agencies?
Benchmarking the per-day cost of $17,590 ($2.57 million / 146 days) requires specific context about the type of construction. For general commercial or institutional building construction, this daily rate can vary significantly based on labor costs, material prices, project complexity, and prevailing wages in Arizona. Federal construction projects often have specific requirements that can influence costs. Without knowing if this involves specialized work (e.g., historic preservation, environmental remediation, complex engineering), it's difficult to definitively state if this rate is high or low. However, for standard construction activities, it falls within a plausible range, though detailed cost breakdowns would be needed for a precise comparison.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?
Primary risks for this contract include potential cost overruns if the scope of work is not precisely defined or if unforeseen site conditions arise, delays in project completion impacting facility operations, and contractor performance issues related to quality of work or adherence to safety standards. As this is a firm-fixed-price contract, the financial risk of cost overruns is largely borne by the contractor, Project Solutions, Inc. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust contract oversight by the National Park Service, clear definition of work requirements in call orders, regular progress monitoring, and adherence to established quality control and safety protocols. The contractor's past performance record, if available, would also be a key indicator of potential risk.
What is the track record of Project Solutions, Inc. in performing similar federal construction contracts, particularly with the Department of the Interior or National Park Service?
The provided data does not include information on the track record of Project Solutions, Inc. To assess their suitability and reliability for this contract, a review of their past performance on federal contracts, especially those with the Department of the Interior or the National Park Service, would be necessary. This would typically involve examining contract databases for previous awards, performance evaluations (e.g., Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System - CPARS), and any history of disputes or contract terminations. A strong performance history on similar projects would indicate a lower risk for this current contract.
How does the total contract value of $2.57 million compare to historical federal spending on commercial and institutional building construction in Arizona?
The total contract value of $2.57 million for this specific BPA call order is a single data point and does not represent overall federal spending trends. To compare it to historical spending, one would need to analyze aggregate data for federal contracts categorized under Commercial and Institutional Building Construction (NAICS code 236220) awarded within Arizona over a specific period. This would involve querying federal procurement databases (like FPDS or SAM.gov) for similar contracts. Without this broader analysis, it's impossible to determine if $2.57 million is a significant or typical amount relative to the historical spending landscape in that sector and region.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: 140P2022A0010
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 505 KANSAS CITY ST, RAPID CITY, SD, 57701
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $256,876
Exercised Options: $256,876
Current Obligation: $256,876
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 140P2024A0001
IDV Type: BPA
Timeline
Start Date: 2026-04-07
Current End Date: 2026-08-31
Potential End Date: 2026-08-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-07
More Contracts from Project Solutions, Inc.
- N129 Slbe 318729 - CMR Services — $1.5M (Department of the Interior)
- Glac 318705 - Utilities Package #1 CMR — $404.3K (Department of the Interior)
- Grca 190083 250176 Tcwl CMR BPA 07 — $323.3K (Department of the Interior)
Other Department of the Interior Contracts
- Department of Health and Human Services, Administration of Children and Families, Office of Refugee Resettlement's Legal Services for Unaccompanied Children — $832.4M (Acacia Center for Justice)
- Military Family Life Counseling Program Igf::ot::igf — $638.8M (MHN Government Services LLC)
- Military Family Life Counseling Program — $637.0M (Magellan Healthcare Inc)
- Grants Program Solutions and Information Technology Support Services — $446.3M (Guidehouse Digital LLC)
- THE Purpose of This Requirement for Grants Program Solutions and IT Support Services IS to Provide Efficient and Effective Grant, Financial, and Contract Management Services, IT Solutions, and Support to the Grantsolutions and ITS Partners — $403.1M (Guidehouse Inc.)