Interior Department awards $495K for engineering services to Bratslavsky Consulting Engineers, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $495,463 ($495.5K)

Contractor: Bratslavsky Consulting Engineers, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of the Interior

Start Date: 2025-05-29

End Date: 2026-11-20

Contract Duration: 540 days

Daily Burn Rate: $918/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 12

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: WEST EUGENE WETLANDS OFFICE BUILDING (RED HOUSE) PHASE I & II

Place of Performance

Location: EUGENE, LANE County, OREGON, 97402

State: Oregon Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Interior obligated $495,463.03 to BRATSLAVSKY CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. for work described as: WEST EUGENE WETLANDS OFFICE BUILDING (RED HOUSE) PHASE I & II Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating a competitive process. 2. The contract is for engineering services, specifically related to the WEST EUGENE WETLANDS OFFICE BUILDING project. 3. The duration of 540 days suggests a significant scope of work for the engineering services required. 4. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, which provides cost certainty for the government. 5. The award was made by the Bureau of Land Management, a sub-agency of the Department of the Interior. 6. The project is located in Oregon, as indicated by the state code 'OR'.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $495,463.03 for engineering services appears reasonable for a project of this nature and duration. Benchmarking against similar projects would provide a more precise assessment, but the fixed-price nature offers cost control. The number of bids received (10) suggests a healthy level of interest and potential for competitive pricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' While this indicates an initial broad solicitation, the 'exclusion of sources' clause suggests that certain potential bidders may have been disqualified or not considered after the initial open phase. The presence of 10 bidders indicates a competitive environment, which generally benefits price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of this award, despite the exclusion clause, suggests that taxpayers are likely to receive a fair price for the engineering services rendered. The multiple bids help ensure that the selected contractor's pricing is market-aligned.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Bureau of Land Management and the Department of the Interior, who will receive engineering services for the WEST EUGENE WETLANDS OFFICE BUILDING project. The services delivered will support the development and potentially the environmental management of the Eugene Wetlands area. The geographic impact is localized to Oregon, specifically the Eugene area. The contract supports the engineering sector workforce, likely involving skilled professionals in civil, environmental, or structural engineering.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The 'exclusion of sources' in the competition type warrants further investigation to understand the rationale and potential impact on broader competition.
Lack of specific details on the engineering deliverables makes it difficult to fully assess the scope and potential risks.
The contract duration of 540 days could present challenges if project requirements evolve significantly.

Positive Signals

Awarded under a full and open competition framework, suggesting a structured procurement process.
The Firm Fixed Price contract type provides budget certainty for the government.
The receipt of 10 bids indicates significant contractor interest and a competitive marketplace for these services.

Sector Analysis

The engineering services sector is a critical component of federal contracting, supporting a wide range of infrastructure, environmental, and facility projects. This contract falls within the broader professional, scientific, and technical services category. Federal spending in engineering services can fluctuate based on infrastructure needs and environmental initiatives. Comparable spending benchmarks would depend on the specific type and scale of engineering required for the wetlands office building.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that this contract was specifically set aside for small businesses, nor is there information about subcontracting plans. The contractor, Bratslavsky Consulting Engineers, Inc., is not explicitly identified as a small business in the provided data. Further analysis would be needed to determine the impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Bureau of Land Management's contracting officers and program managers. The Department of the Interior's Office of Inspector General may also provide oversight depending on the scale and nature of any potential issues. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of contract awards, but detailed project performance data may not be readily available.

Related Government Programs

Bureau of Land Management Facility Construction
Environmental Engineering Services
Wetlands Conservation Projects
Federal Building Design and Construction

Risk Flags

Potential for scope creep given the multi-phase nature of the project.
Need for clear performance metrics to ensure quality under Fixed Price contract.
Rationale for 'exclusion of sources' requires further understanding.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Interior awarded $495,463.03 to BRATSLAVSKY CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.. WEST EUGENE WETLANDS OFFICE BUILDING (RED HOUSE) PHASE I & II

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BRATSLAVSKY CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Interior (Bureau of Land Management).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $495,463.03.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-05-29. End: 2026-11-20.

What is the specific nature of the engineering services required for the WEST EUGENE WETLANDS OFFICE BUILDING PHASE I & II?

The provided data indicates the contract is for 'Engineering Services' (NAICS code 541330) related to the 'WEST EUGENE WETLANDS OFFICE BUILDING (RED HOUSE) PHASE I & II'. While the exact deliverables are not detailed, engineering services in this context typically encompass architectural design, structural engineering, civil engineering (site preparation, drainage), environmental engineering (impact assessments, compliance), and potentially mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) design. Phase I and II suggest a multi-stage development, implying services could range from initial feasibility studies and design development to construction oversight and post-construction support.

How does the $495,463.03 contract value compare to similar engineering projects for federal facilities?

Benchmarking this contract value requires comparing it to similar projects in terms of scope, complexity, and location. A $495K contract for engineering services for a specific building phase suggests a moderate-sized project. For context, larger federal building projects can involve millions in engineering fees. However, for a specific phase or a smaller facility, this amount could be appropriate. The number of bidders (10) suggests the market found the opportunity attractive at this value. A more precise comparison would involve analyzing the square footage of the planned building, the specific engineering disciplines required, and the duration of the engineering effort.

What are the potential risks associated with a Firm Fixed Price contract for engineering services?

Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contracts aim to provide cost certainty for the government by establishing a set price regardless of the contractor's actual costs. For engineering services, the primary risk for the government under an FFP contract is that the contractor may cut corners on quality or scope to maintain profitability if unforeseen complexities arise. Conversely, the risk for the contractor is that they may underestimate the effort required, leading to reduced profit margins or even losses if costs escalate beyond projections. Effective oversight and clear performance standards are crucial to mitigate these risks and ensure quality delivery.

What does the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' procurement method imply?

This procurement method indicates that the agency initially intended to solicit bids from all responsible sources ('Full and Open Competition'). However, 'After Exclusion of Sources' suggests that certain potential offerors were excluded from the competition at some stage, possibly after an initial solicitation or pre-qualification phase. The reasons for exclusion could range from failure to meet specific technical requirements, past performance issues, or other criteria outlined in the solicitation. While it started as open, the exclusion narrows the field, and the impact on price and innovation depends on the number and competitiveness of the remaining bidders. The fact that 10 bids were received suggests that the exclusion did not unduly limit the competitive pool.

What is the track record of Bratslavsky Consulting Engineers, Inc. with federal contracts?

Information regarding the specific track record of Bratslavsky Consulting Engineers, Inc. with federal contracts is not provided in the data. To assess their track record, one would typically examine their past performance on similar government projects, including contract values, timeliness of delivery, quality of work, and any history of disputes or contract terminations. Databases like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) would be primary sources for this information.

How does the duration of 540 days align with the scope of Phase I & II engineering services?

A duration of 540 days (approximately 18 months) for Phase I & II engineering services for an office building project seems reasonable, especially if it encompasses detailed design, permitting, and potentially some pre-construction support. Phase I might involve conceptualization, feasibility, and preliminary design, while Phase II could cover detailed design development, construction documents, and bidding support. The timeline allows for thorough analysis, design iterations, and coordination among various engineering disciplines. However, the actual appropriateness depends heavily on the specific complexity of the building, site conditions, and regulatory requirements in Oregon.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: ARCHITECT/ENGINEER SERVICES › ARCH-ENG SVCS - GENERAL

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 12

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 500 W 27TH AVENUE SUITE A, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99503

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $495,463

Exercised Options: $495,463

Current Obligation: $495,463

Actual Outlays: $194,954

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 3

Total Subaward Amount: $316,369

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 140F0822D0204

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline