Interior Department awards $2.16M BPA Call to TEKSYNAP for IT services, highlighting a competitive procurement

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,159,352 ($2.2M)

Contractor: Teksynap Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of the Interior

Start Date: 2024-08-31

End Date: 2026-08-30

Contract Duration: 729 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: IT

Official Description: I3MS SERVICE BPA CALL

Place of Performance

Location: RESTON, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20190

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Interior obligated $2.2 million to TEKSYNAP CORPORATION for work described as: I3MS SERVICE BPA CALL Key points: 1. The contract value of $2.16 million for IT services represents a moderate investment within the federal IT landscape. 2. TEKSYNAP CORPORATION secured this BPA Call under a full and open competition, indicating a healthy market. 3. The duration of the contract (729 days) suggests a need for sustained IT support services. 4. The Computer Systems Design Services NAICS code points to a focus on specialized IT solutions. 5. The contract's performance period spans across fiscal years 2024 and 2025, aligning with federal budget cycles. 6. The absence of small business set-aside flags suggests this was not specifically targeted for smaller enterprises.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $2.16 million for 729 days of service appears reasonable for specialized IT support. Benchmarking against similar Computer Systems Design Services contracts within the federal government would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, the full and open competition suggests that pricing was likely subject to market forces, which generally leads to competitive rates.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the nature of the competition suggests that multiple companies likely vied for this BPA Call. This level of competition is generally favorable for price discovery and ensuring the government receives competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by fostering a competitive environment that drives down costs and encourages innovation from a wide range of potential contractors.

Public Impact

The Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) within the Department of the Interior is the primary beneficiary, receiving essential IT support. The services delivered fall under Computer Systems Design Services, likely encompassing IT infrastructure management, software development, or technical support. The contract is geographically located in Virginia (VA), indicating a concentration of IT support operations in that region. The contract supports the federal workforce by ensuring the availability and functionality of critical IT systems necessary for agency operations.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The federal IT services market is vast and highly competitive, with agencies constantly seeking specialized support for their complex systems. Contracts for Computer Systems Design Services, categorized under NAICS code 541512, are crucial for maintaining and upgrading government IT infrastructure. This BPA Call fits within the broader trend of agencies leveraging flexible contract vehicles like Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs) to procure IT support efficiently. Spending in this sector is consistently high, reflecting the ongoing digital transformation across federal agencies.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor is there an indication of specific subcontracting goals for small businesses. This suggests that the primary focus was on securing the best value through open competition rather than specifically targeting small business participation. The impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless TEKSYNAP CORPORATION voluntarily engages small businesses as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) contracting officers and program managers. The contract's performance will be monitored through regular reporting, service level agreements, and potentially site visits. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards, though detailed performance data may not be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

it-services, computer-systems-design, department-of-the-interior, bureau-of-safety-and-environmental-enforcement, bpa-call, full-and-open-competition, labor-hours, virginia, teksynap-corporation, moderate-value

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Interior awarded $2.2 million to TEKSYNAP CORPORATION. I3MS SERVICE BPA CALL

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TEKSYNAP CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Interior (Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-08-31. End: 2026-08-30.

What is TEKSYNAP CORPORATION's track record with federal contracts, particularly in IT services?

TEKSYNAP CORPORATION has a history of securing federal contracts, indicating a capacity to meet government requirements. While specific details on their performance across all contracts are not provided here, their ability to win this BPA Call suggests they possess the necessary qualifications and competitive positioning. Further analysis would involve examining past performance evaluations, contract modifications, and any reported issues on previous awards to gauge their reliability and expertise in delivering Computer Systems Design Services. Understanding their experience with similar agencies or service types would also be beneficial for a comprehensive assessment.

How does the awarded value of $2.16 million compare to similar IT service contracts for the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement?

Without direct comparative data for BSEE's IT service contracts, a precise benchmark is difficult. However, $2.16 million for a two-year BPA Call for Computer Systems Design Services is a moderate award. Federal IT spending varies significantly based on scope, duration, and specialization. Contracts for enterprise-wide system overhauls or large-scale cloud migrations can reach tens or hundreds of millions. Conversely, smaller, specialized support tasks or individual system maintenance contracts might be in the hundreds of thousands. This award appears to fall within a typical range for sustained, specialized IT support services, especially given the full and open competition which should have driven a market-based price.

What are the primary risks associated with a 'LABOR HOURS' contract type for IT services?

The primary risk with a 'LABOR HOURS' contract type, especially for IT services, is the potential for cost overruns if not meticulously managed. Unlike fixed-price contracts, the government pays for the actual hours worked by the contractor's personnel. This can lead to increased costs if tasks take longer than anticipated, if inefficient labor practices are employed, or if the scope of work expands without proper controls. Effective oversight, detailed timesheet verification, and clear performance metrics are crucial to mitigate these risks and ensure that the government receives value for the labor hours purchased. Scope creep is a significant concern that needs vigilant management.

How effective is 'full and open competition' in ensuring value for taxpayer money in the IT services sector?

Full and open competition is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring value for taxpayer money in the IT services sector. By allowing all responsible sources to bid, it maximizes the pool of potential contractors, thereby increasing the likelihood of receiving competitive pricing and innovative solutions. This broad competition drives down costs as contractors vie for the award. Furthermore, it provides agencies with a wider range of technical approaches and capabilities to choose from, ensuring they can select the best fit for their needs. While it requires more administrative effort upfront, the long-term benefits in terms of cost savings and quality are substantial.

What is the typical duration for IT service contracts of this nature, and does this contract's duration align with industry standards?

The duration of this contract is 729 days, which is approximately two years. For IT service contracts, particularly those involving ongoing support, maintenance, or system design, a two-year period is quite common. Federal agencies often structure contracts with initial periods of performance followed by options for extension. This duration allows for stable service delivery and project continuity without committing taxpayer funds for excessively long periods upfront. It aligns well with typical federal budgeting cycles and the need for adaptable IT solutions that may require re-evaluation or re-competition within a few years due to technological advancements.

Are there any specific performance indicators or metrics mentioned for this contract that would allow for an assessment of success?

The provided data does not include specific performance indicators or metrics for this contract. Contracts for IT services, especially those under a BPA Call with a 'LABOR HOURS' type, often rely on service level agreements (SLAs) and task-order specific deliverables for performance assessment. Without access to the full contract details or associated task orders, it is impossible to determine the success criteria. Effective oversight would involve tracking metrics such as system uptime, response times for support requests, project completion rates, and adherence to security protocols. The absence of publicly available metrics makes a direct assessment of contractor success challenging based solely on this summary.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesComputer Systems Design and Related ServicesComputer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONSIT AND TELECOM - APLLICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1900 ORACLE WAY, RESTON, VA, 20190

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,159,352

Exercised Options: $2,159,352

Current Obligation: $2,159,352

Actual Outlays: $1,361,392

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 140E0123A0006

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2024-08-31

Current End Date: 2026-08-30

Potential End Date: 2026-08-30 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-08

More Contracts from Teksynap Corporation

View all Teksynap Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of the Interior Contracts

View all Department of the Interior contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending