Interior Department awards $16.4M IT task order to TEKSYNAP CORPORATION for application development and support

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $16,437,084 ($16.4M)

Contractor: Teksynap Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of the Interior

Start Date: 2023-06-01

End Date: 2026-07-31

Contract Duration: 1,156 days

Daily Burn Rate: $14.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: IT

Official Description: TIMS IT APPLICATION SUPPORT SERVICES BPA - TASK ORDER 0002: TIMS APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: RESTON, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 20190

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Interior obligated $16.4 million to TEKSYNAP CORPORATION for work described as: TIMS IT APPLICATION SUPPORT SERVICES BPA - TASK ORDER 0002: TIMS APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Task order awarded under a broader BPA, suggesting potential for future work and established relationship. 2. FIRM FIXED PRICE contract type offers cost certainty for the government. 3. Competition was full and open, indicating a broad market search. 4. Contract duration of nearly 4 years provides stability for service delivery. 5. Focus on Computer Systems Design Services aligns with critical IT infrastructure needs. 6. Task order value is moderate within the context of federal IT spending.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The task order value of $16.4 million over approximately 4 years appears reasonable for comprehensive IT application development and support services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for IT application support and development within federal agencies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The FIRM FIXED PRICE structure helps control costs, but the ultimate value depends on the quality and efficiency of the services delivered by TEKSYNAP CORPORATION.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This task order was awarded under a full and open competition BPA call. This indicates that the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement sought proposals from all eligible sources. The specific number of bidders for this particular task order is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a competitive process was initiated, which generally promotes price discovery and encourages multiple vendors to offer their best pricing and technical solutions.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process is generally favorable for taxpayers as it aims to secure the best value by allowing a wide range of qualified contractors to compete, potentially driving down prices and improving service quality.

Public Impact

The Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) benefits from enhanced IT application development and support, crucial for its regulatory and operational functions. Services delivered include application development and ongoing support, ensuring the functionality and reliability of critical IT systems. The primary geographic impact is likely within the operational areas of the BSEE, supporting their mission nationwide. This contract supports IT professionals and developers, contributing to the federal IT workforce.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for vendor lock-in if the BPA is heavily utilized by a single contractor over time.
Reliance on a single task order for critical application support could pose a risk if performance issues arise.

Positive Signals

Full and open competition suggests a robust selection process, likely leading to a qualified vendor.
FIRM FIXED PRICE contract type provides cost predictability.
Long-term nature of the BPA and task order allows for stable service delivery and relationship building.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Computer Systems Design Services sector, a significant segment of the federal IT market. This sector encompasses a wide range of services from custom software development to IT infrastructure management. Federal spending in this area is consistently high, driven by the need to modernize legacy systems, develop new applications, and maintain robust IT operations across various agencies. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other task orders or contracts for similar IT application development and support services awarded to companies of similar size and capability.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the direct impact on small business set-asides is minimal. However, TEKSYNAP CORPORATION, as the prime contractor, may engage small businesses as subcontractors. The extent of small business subcontracting would depend on TEKSYNAP's own business practices and any requirements stipulated within the broader BPA or this specific task order, which are not detailed here. Without specific subcontracting plans, the direct benefit to the small business ecosystem from this particular award is not quantifiable.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this task order would primarily fall under the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) within the Department of the Interior. The agency's contracting officers and program managers are responsible for monitoring performance, ensuring compliance with contract terms, and approving deliverables. Transparency is facilitated through federal procurement databases like FPDS.gov where contract awards are reported. While specific Inspector General (IG) jurisdiction for this particular task order isn't explicitly stated, the Department of the Interior's Office of Inspector General typically has oversight over agency spending and operations to detect fraud, waste, and abuse.

Related Government Programs

Department of the Interior IT Modernization Efforts
Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) IT Services
Federal Civilian IT Application Development Contracts
Broad Area Announcement (BAA) Task Orders
Computer Systems Design Services Contracts

Risk Flags

Contract Duration
Reliance on BPA
Performance Risk
Scope Definition

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Interior awarded $16.4 million to TEKSYNAP CORPORATION. TIMS IT APPLICATION SUPPORT SERVICES BPA - TASK ORDER 0002: TIMS APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TEKSYNAP CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Interior (Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $16.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-06-01. End: 2026-07-31.

What is TEKSYNAP CORPORATION's past performance record with the federal government, particularly within the Department of the Interior?

Assessing TEKSYNAP CORPORATION's past performance is crucial for understanding their reliability and capability in fulfilling this task order. A review of federal procurement data (e.g., through FPDS or CPARS) would reveal their history of contract awards, performance ratings, and any documented issues or successes. Specifically, looking at their prior work with the Department of the Interior and for similar IT application development and support services would provide the most relevant context. Positive past performance indicators would include consistently high ratings, timely delivery, and adherence to budget, while negative indicators might involve performance disputes, contract terminations, or significant delays. Without direct access to CPARS data for TEKSYNAP, a definitive assessment cannot be made, but the award itself suggests they met the agency's minimum requirements.

How does the $16.4 million value of this task order compare to similar IT application support and development contracts within the federal government?

The $16.4 million value for this task order, spanning approximately four years, represents a moderate investment in IT application development and support. To benchmark this effectively, one would compare it against similar contracts awarded by agencies like the Department of the Interior or other civilian agencies for comparable services (e.g., custom software development, system integration, ongoing application maintenance). Factors such as contract duration, scope of work (development vs. pure support), and the specific technologies involved significantly influence pricing. For instance, a task order focused solely on legacy system maintenance might be less expensive than one involving extensive new development. A preliminary comparison suggests this value is within a typical range for comprehensive IT support over several years, but a detailed analysis of contract scope and market rates is needed for a precise valuation.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and what mitigation strategies are in place?

Key risks for this contract include potential performance deficiencies by the contractor (TEKSYNAP CORPORATION), scope creep leading to cost overruns (though mitigated by FIRM FIXED PRICE), and potential disruptions if key personnel leave. Risks also exist if the underlying BPA, under which this task order was issued, has limitations or if the agency's requirements evolve significantly beyond the initial scope. Mitigation strategies typically involve robust contract oversight by the BSEE, clear performance metrics and deliverables, regular progress reviews, and contingency planning. The FIRM FIXED PRICE nature of the contract inherently shifts some cost risk to the contractor. Furthermore, the full and open competition process suggests a pool of qualified vendors, reducing the risk of selecting an underperforming contractor.

How effective is the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) in managing its IT contracts to ensure optimal value and service delivery?

Assessing the effectiveness of BSEE's IT contract management requires examining their procurement processes, oversight mechanisms, and historical outcomes. Evidence of effective management would include consistent delivery of required IT services, successful modernization of systems, and achieving objectives within budget. Conversely, indicators of less effective management might include frequent contract modifications, cost overruns, missed deadlines, or systems that do not meet user needs. The fact that this task order was awarded under a full and open competition suggests a structured approach to sourcing. Further analysis would involve reviewing BSEE's contract close-out data, performance reviews (CPARS) of their contractors, and any internal audits or IG reports related to their IT spending and project execution.

What are the historical spending patterns for IT application development and support services within the Department of the Interior over the last five years?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for IT application development and support within the Department of the Interior (DOI) over the past five years would reveal trends in agency investment in this area. This would involve aggregating data from federal procurement databases (like FPDS) for contracts categorized under NAICS code 541512 (Computer Systems Design Services) and related IT service codes awarded by the DOI. Key trends to look for include the total annual spending, the average value and duration of contracts, the primary types of services procured (development, maintenance, cloud migration, etc.), and the dominant contractors. Understanding these patterns helps contextualize the $16.4 million task order, indicating whether it represents an increase, decrease, or steady level of investment in IT application services for the agency.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › IT AND TELECOM - APLLICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 140E0123Q0001

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1900 ORACLE WAY, RESTON, VA, 20190

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $27,280,245

Exercised Options: $16,437,084

Current Obligation: $16,437,084

Actual Outlays: $13,736,713

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 140E0123A0006

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline