Interior Department awards $79.7K purchase order for conference room updates to Seneca Federal Solutions

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $79,692 ($79.7K)

Contractor: Seneca Federal Solutions, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of the Interior

Start Date: 2026-04-01

End Date: 2026-07-31

Contract Duration: 121 days

Daily Burn Rate: $659/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: UDALL CONFERENCE ROOM 7058 UPDATE

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20240

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Interior obligated $79,691.77 to SENECA FEDERAL SOLUTIONS, LLC for work described as: UDALL CONFERENCE ROOM 7058 UPDATE Key points: 1. Contract awarded for electrical work and wiring installation, suggesting infrastructure or facility maintenance needs. 2. The award is a purchase order, typically used for smaller, simpler acquisitions. 3. The contract duration is 121 days, indicating a short-term project. 4. The contractor, Seneca Federal Solutions, LLC, is a new entity in federal contracting. 5. The contract was not competitively procured, raising questions about price discovery. 6. The fixed-price contract type aims to control costs for the government.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The award amount of $79,691.77 for a 121-day project is difficult to benchmark without specific scope details. As a purchase order, it is likely for a defined, smaller scope of work. However, the lack of competition means there's no direct comparison to assess if this price represents good value for money. The fixed-price nature provides cost certainty, but the absence of competitive bidding prevents a robust value assessment against market rates.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded under 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION,' indicating a sole-source or limited competition scenario. The specific justification for this approach is not provided in the data. Without a competitive process, it's challenging to determine the number of potential bidders or the extent of market interest. This procurement method limits the government's ability to leverage market forces for optimal pricing and innovation.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition means taxpayers may not be receiving the best possible price for the services rendered, as there was no pressure from competing offers to drive down costs.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely the Department of the Interior employees who will utilize the updated conference room. The services delivered include electrical contractors and other wiring installation, likely for the 'UDALL CONFERENCE ROOM 7058'. The geographic impact is localized to the District of Columbia, where the Department of the Interior is headquartered. Workforce implications are minimal, likely involving a small team from Seneca Federal Solutions for the duration of the project.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition raises concerns about potential overpayment and missed opportunities for better value.
Limited information on the contractor's past performance or capacity for this specific type of work.
The sole-source award prevents an assessment of market competitiveness and pricing benchmarks.

Positive Signals

The fixed-price contract type offers cost certainty for the government.
The project duration is relatively short, suggesting a focused scope of work.
The award is to a small business (assuming Seneca Federal Solutions qualifies, though not explicitly stated).

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the construction and facilities maintenance sector, specifically focusing on electrical work. The federal government frequently procures services for facility upgrades and maintenance. The market for electrical contractors is generally competitive, making the sole-source nature of this award notable. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing the cost per square foot or per hour for similar electrical upgrade projects within government facilities.

Small Business Impact

The data does not explicitly state if Seneca Federal Solutions, LLC is a small business. If it is, this award could represent an opportunity for small business participation. However, without a small business set-aside designation or subcontracting plan details, its impact on the broader small business ecosystem is unclear. Further information would be needed to assess if this contract contributes to federal small business goals.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this purchase order would typically fall under the Department of the Interior's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures are inherent in the fixed-price contract, requiring delivery of specified services. Transparency is limited due to the sole-source nature and the lack of detailed justification publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Federal Building and Facilities Maintenance
Electrical Contractor Services
Conference Room Modernization Projects
Department of the Interior IT Infrastructure Upgrades

Risk Flags

Sole-source award without clear justification.
Limited contractor performance data available.
Potential for non-competitive pricing.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Interior awarded $79,691.77 to SENECA FEDERAL SOLUTIONS, LLC. UDALL CONFERENCE ROOM 7058 UPDATE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SENECA FEDERAL SOLUTIONS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Interior (Departmental Offices).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $79,691.77.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-01. End: 2026-07-31.

What is the specific scope of work for the 'UDALL CONFERENCE ROOM 7058 UPDATE' and why was it deemed not available for competition?

The provided data indicates the contract is for 'Electrical Contractors and Other Wiring Installation Contractors' for the 'UDALL CONFERENCE ROOM 7058 UPDATE'. The reason for it being 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' is not detailed. Typically, this designation implies a sole-source award due to factors such as urgency, unique capabilities of a single contractor, or a follow-on to a previous contract where only one source is viable. Without further justification from the agency, it is impossible to ascertain the precise scope or the rationale behind the limited competition. This lack of transparency hinders a full assessment of value and necessity.

What is the track record of Seneca Federal Solutions, LLC in performing federal contracts, particularly for electrical installations?

Based on the provided data, Seneca Federal Solutions, LLC appears to be a relatively new entrant or has limited publicly available contract history within the federal system. The data does not offer details on past performance, project completion rates, or client satisfaction. For a sole-source award, especially one involving critical infrastructure like electrical systems, a thorough review of the contractor's experience, technical capabilities, and past performance on similar projects would be crucial for risk mitigation and ensuring successful project execution. Further investigation into federal procurement databases might reveal more comprehensive performance metrics.

How does the $79,691.77 award for a 121-day project compare to market rates for similar electrical upgrade services?

Benchmarking the $79,691.77 award for a 121-day project is challenging without specific details on the scope of work, such as the square footage of the conference room, the complexity of the electrical upgrades (e.g., new wiring, lighting, power outlets, data ports), and the labor hours involved. However, for a project of this duration and potential scope, the amount is not inherently excessive but warrants scrutiny due to the lack of competition. Market rates for electrical contractors can vary significantly by geographic location and the specific services required. A competitive bidding process would have provided a clearer indication of fair market value.

What are the potential risks associated with awarding a contract on a sole-source basis for facility upgrades?

Awarding a contract on a sole-source basis for facility upgrades like the 'UDALL CONFERENCE ROOM 7058 UPDATE' carries several potential risks. Primarily, the government may not achieve the best possible price due to the absence of competition, potentially leading to overspending. There's also a risk of reduced innovation, as contractors are not incentivized to propose novel or more cost-effective solutions. Furthermore, it can limit opportunities for new or small businesses to enter the federal market. Ensuring the selected contractor possesses the necessary expertise and capacity is also critical, as vetting is less rigorous than in a competitive environment.

What is the historical spending pattern for electrical contractors and wiring installation services within the Department of the Interior?

The provided data snippet focuses on a single purchase order and does not offer historical spending patterns for the Department of the Interior (DOI) concerning electrical contractors and wiring installation. To analyze historical spending, one would need access to broader contract databases covering multiple fiscal years. Such an analysis would reveal the typical contract values, the frequency of sole-source versus competitive awards in this category, the primary contractors utilized by the DOI, and the overall budget allocated to facility maintenance and upgrades. This context is essential for evaluating whether the current award aligns with past trends or represents an anomaly.

What are the implications of the fixed-price contract type for this specific project?

The 'FIRM FIXED PRICE' (FFP) contract type for the 'UDALL CONFERENCE ROOM 7058 UPDATE' is generally advantageous for the government as it shifts the risk of cost overruns to the contractor, Seneca Federal Solutions, LLC. The government agrees to pay a set price regardless of the contractor's actual costs incurred. This provides budget certainty and simplifies financial administration. However, for FFP contracts, the initial price negotiation is critical. Given this contract was sole-sourced, the government must ensure the negotiated price accurately reflects the scope of work and is competitive, as there was no market pressure to establish a fair price.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Building Equipment Contractors › Electrical Contractors and Other Wiring Installation Contractors

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 14200 PARK MEADOW DR STE 125, CHANTILLY, VA, 20151

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Sole Proprietorship, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $79,692

Exercised Options: $79,692

Current Obligation: $79,692

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline