RIVA SOLUTIONS INC awarded $1.6M contract for logistics consulting by Department of the Interior

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $1,615,829 ($1.6M)

Contractor: Riva Solutions Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of the Interior

Start Date: 2025-04-15

End Date: 2026-04-14

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $4.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Other

Official Description: CONTRACT FOR AOSD & ETR

Place of Performance

Location: MCLEAN, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22102

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Interior obligated $1.6 million to RIVA SOLUTIONS INC for work described as: CONTRACT FOR AOSD & ETR Key points: 1. Contract focuses on process, physical distribution, and logistics consulting services. 2. Awarded as a BPA Call under a Time and Materials contract. 3. Competition was full and open, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. Contract duration is one year, ending April 14, 2026. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code is 541614. 6. The contractor, RIVA SOLUTIONS INC, is based in Virginia. 7. No small business set-aside was utilized for this contract.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $1.6 million for a one-year period for logistics consulting services appears within a reasonable range for specialized consulting. However, without specific deliverables or performance metrics, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. Benchmarking against similar contracts for process, physical distribution, and logistics consulting would provide a clearer picture of whether the pricing is competitive. The Time and Materials (T&M) contract type can sometimes lead to cost overruns if not closely managed, which warrants attention.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under a full and open competition, indicating that all eligible sources were permitted to submit bids. This typically suggests a robust bidding environment. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation implies that the agency sought the widest possible participation. This level of competition is generally expected to drive better pricing and service offerings.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition is favorable for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of receiving competitive pricing and high-quality services, maximizing the value of federal dollars spent.

Public Impact

The Department of the Interior benefits from enhanced logistics and distribution processes. Services delivered include consulting on process optimization and physical distribution. The geographic impact is primarily within the Department of the Interior's operations. Workforce implications may involve training or process changes for internal staff.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Time and Materials contract type can lead to cost uncertainty if not managed effectively.
Lack of specific performance metrics makes it difficult to assess the full value delivered.
Limited information on the number of bidders in the full and open competition.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive process.
Contract duration of one year allows for focused project execution.
Contractor is RIVA SOLUTIONS INC, a known entity in government contracting.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically focusing on management and technical consulting. The market for logistics consulting is diverse, with many firms offering specialized services. Federal spending in this area supports agency efficiency and operational effectiveness. Comparable spending benchmarks would depend on the specific scope of logistics and distribution process improvements sought by the Department of the Interior.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses. This means that opportunities for small business participation in this specific contract are likely limited unless they are prime contractors or subcontractors to the prime. The absence of a small business set-aside does not necessarily reflect the overall small business utilization by RIVA SOLUTIONS INC or the Department of the Interior.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program office within the Department of the Interior. Accountability measures would be tied to the performance standards and deliverables outlined in the contract. Transparency is facilitated by public contract databases, but detailed operational oversight information is usually internal. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Logistics and Supply Chain Management Services
Management and Consulting Services
Department of the Interior IT and Professional Services Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to Time and Materials contract type.
Lack of specific performance metrics for value assessment.
Limited transparency on the number of bidders in the competition.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Interior awarded $1.6 million to RIVA SOLUTIONS INC. CONTRACT FOR AOSD & ETR

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is RIVA SOLUTIONS INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Interior (Departmental Offices).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $1.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-04-15. End: 2026-04-14.

What is RIVA SOLUTIONS INC's track record with the Department of the Interior and other federal agencies?

RIVA SOLUTIONS INC has a history of contracting with federal agencies, including the Department of the Interior. Analyzing their past performance on similar contracts, particularly those involving logistics and process consulting, would provide insight into their capabilities and reliability. A review of contract databases and performance evaluations (if publicly available) can reveal their success rate, any past issues, and their overall reputation as a government contractor. Understanding their experience with Time and Materials contracts is also crucial, as it highlights their ability to manage projects within this flexible but potentially cost-variable structure.

How does the $1.6 million contract value compare to similar logistics consulting contracts awarded by the federal government?

Benchmarking this $1.6 million contract against similar logistics consulting services requires access to a broader dataset of federal contract awards. Factors such as the specific scope of work (e.g., supply chain optimization, distribution network analysis, process re-engineering), the duration of the contract, and the agency's size and complexity all influence pricing. Generally, consulting contracts of this magnitude for a one-year term are common for specialized support. However, without detailed comparisons of deliverables and market rates for similar services, it's difficult to definitively state if this represents excellent or fair value. The Time and Materials nature of the award also means the final cost could fluctuate.

What are the primary risks associated with this Time and Materials (T&M) contract for logistics consulting?

The primary risk with a Time and Materials (T&M) contract, especially for consulting services, is the potential for cost escalation if not managed diligently. Unlike fixed-price contracts, T&M contracts pay the contractor for direct labor hours and costs incurred, plus a fixed fee or time-based rate. This can lead to budget uncertainty and potentially higher overall costs if project scope creeps or if labor hours are not efficiently utilized. For the Department of the Interior, effective oversight, clear task definitions, and robust monitoring of hours and expenses are critical to mitigate these risks and ensure the contract remains within budget and delivers the intended value.

How effective are 'full and open competition' contract awards in ensuring competitive pricing for consulting services?

Full and open competition is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring competitive pricing for consulting services. By allowing all responsible sources to submit proposals, agencies maximize the pool of potential bidders, thereby increasing the likelihood of receiving competitive offers. This process encourages contractors to submit their best pricing and technical solutions to win the contract. While the number of bidders is not specified here, the 'full and open' designation itself signals an intent to foster competition, which typically benefits taxpayers by driving down costs and improving service quality compared to sole-source or limited competition awards.

What is the historical spending trend for logistics consulting services within the Department of the Interior?

Analyzing historical spending trends for logistics consulting within the Department of the Interior would require examining contract data over several fiscal years. This would involve identifying contracts with similar NAICS codes (e.g., 541614) and service descriptions related to logistics, process improvement, and distribution. Understanding past spending patterns can reveal whether the current $1.6 million award is consistent with previous investments, represents an increase or decrease, and whether there's a trend towards using specific contract types like T&M. Such analysis helps in budget forecasting and identifying potential areas for cost savings or increased investment.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Process, Physical Distribution, and Logistics Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1676 INTERNATIONAL DR, MC LEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $1,833,843

Exercised Options: $1,615,829

Current Obligation: $1,615,829

Actual Outlays: $879,856

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 140D7020A0004

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline