Advantor Systems II LLC awarded $3.19M for maintenance, training, and products, with a 364-day duration

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,189,519 ($3.2M)

Contractor: Advantor Systems II LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of the Interior

Start Date: 2024-09-27

End Date: 2025-09-26

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: MAINTENANCE SUPPORT SERVICES, TRAINING, AND PRODUCTS

Place of Performance

Location: ORLANDO, ORANGE County, FLORIDA, 32826

State: Florida Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Interior obligated $3.2 million to ADVANTOR SYSTEMS II LLC for work described as: MAINTENANCE SUPPORT SERVICES, TRAINING, AND PRODUCTS Key points: 1. Contract value of $3.19M for a one-year period suggests a moderate investment in specialized support. 2. The firm-fixed-price contract type indicates that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns. 3. Competition was full and open, implying a potentially competitive bidding process that could benefit the government. 4. The contract is for maintenance, training, and products related to communications equipment. 5. The award is a BPA Call, suggesting it's an order against an existing Blanket Purchase Agreement. 6. The contract is located in Florida, potentially impacting local technical support availability.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $3.19M for a one-year term for maintenance, training, and products appears reasonable given the specialized nature of communications equipment. Benchmarking against similar contracts for advanced communication system support would provide a more precise value assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure is favorable for the government, transferring cost overrun risk to the contractor.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This approach typically fosters a competitive environment, potentially leading to better pricing and service offerings for the government. The number of bidders is not specified, but the open competition suggests a robust process.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally maximizes the government's ability to obtain goods and services at competitive prices, thereby maximizing taxpayer value.

Public Impact

The Department of the Interior benefits from enhanced maintenance, training, and product availability for its communications equipment. Federal agencies relying on specific communications equipment will receive necessary support to ensure operational continuity. The contract's geographic focus in Florida may lead to localized job creation or support roles within the state. The availability of training services could upskill personnel within the Department of the Interior.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for vendor lock-in if specialized knowledge is concentrated with Advantor Systems II LLC.
Dependence on a single BPA Call could limit flexibility if broader needs arise beyond the scope of this specific order.

Positive Signals

Full and open competition suggests a healthy market and potential for future competitive awards.
Firm-fixed-price contract type aligns cost risk with the contractor, benefiting the government's budget predictability.
The contract duration of one year allows for periodic reassessment of needs and market conditions.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Other Communications Equipment Manufacturing sector, which encompasses the production and support of various communication devices. The market for such services is driven by the need for reliable and advanced communication infrastructure across government agencies. Spending in this area is critical for national security, operational efficiency, and inter-agency communication. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other federal contracts for similar maintenance, training, and product support for specialized communication systems.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside (ss: false) or be awarded to a small business (sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from this specific award. The focus is on larger prime contractors, and any small business involvement would likely be at a lower tier, not explicitly detailed in this award notice.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of the Interior's contracting officers and program managers. As a BPA Call, the underlying BPA likely has its own oversight mechanisms. Transparency is facilitated by public contract databases. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Department of the Interior IT Support Contracts
Federal Communications Equipment Procurement
Government Training and Maintenance Services
BPA Call Awards

Risk Flags

Contract duration of one year may limit long-term strategic planning for support.
Potential for vendor lock-in if specialized knowledge is highly concentrated.
Dependence on BPA Call structure might limit flexibility for broader requirements.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Interior awarded $3.2 million to ADVANTOR SYSTEMS II LLC. MAINTENANCE SUPPORT SERVICES, TRAINING, AND PRODUCTS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ADVANTOR SYSTEMS II LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Interior (Departmental Offices).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2024-09-27. End: 2025-09-26.

What is the track record of Advantor Systems II LLC with federal contracts, particularly in communications equipment support?

Advantor Systems II LLC has a history of federal contracting, though specific details on their performance in communications equipment maintenance, training, and products require deeper analysis of their contract portfolio. Examining past awards, contract values, and any performance reviews or contract terminations would provide a clearer picture of their reliability and expertise. A review of their contract history on platforms like SAM.gov or FPDS can reveal the types of agencies they've served, the scope of their previous work, and their success rate in fulfilling contract obligations. Understanding their past performance is crucial for assessing the risk associated with this current award and ensuring the government receives the expected value.

How does the $3.19M contract value compare to similar maintenance and training contracts for communications equipment within the federal government?

The $3.19M contract value for a one-year term for maintenance, training, and products related to communications equipment is a moderate investment. To benchmark effectively, one would need to compare this against contracts of similar scope, duration, and complexity awarded by agencies like the Department of Defense, DHS, or other intelligence community components that heavily rely on advanced communication systems. Factors such as the specific type of equipment, the level of technical expertise required, and the geographic scope of support (e.g., CONUS vs. OCONUS) significantly influence pricing. Without access to a detailed database of comparable contracts, it's challenging to definitively state if this represents excellent, fair, or concerning value, but it falls within a typical range for specialized federal support services.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

Primary risks include potential performance issues from the contractor (Advantor Systems II LLC), such as delays in service delivery or inadequate training quality. There's also a risk of cost escalation if the firm-fixed-price contract doesn't fully account for unforeseen complexities, though this risk is primarily borne by the contractor. Another risk could be the obsolescence of the communications equipment itself, making maintenance and training less effective over time. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust contract oversight by the Department of the Interior, clear performance metrics and Service Level Agreements (SLAs) within the contract, and the option for the government to terminate for default if performance is unsatisfactory. The full and open competition also mitigates risk by ensuring a competitive market.

What is the expected program effectiveness and impact of these maintenance, training, and product services?

The expected effectiveness hinges on the reliability and advancement of the Department of the Interior's communications infrastructure. High-quality maintenance ensures minimal downtime and optimal performance of critical communication systems. Comprehensive training equips personnel with the necessary skills to operate and manage these systems efficiently, reducing errors and improving response times during operational needs. The provision of necessary products ensures that equipment is up-to-date and functional. Ultimately, the program's success contributes to the agency's overall mission effectiveness by ensuring seamless and secure communication channels, which are vital for coordination, data transfer, and decision-making across various departmental operations.

How has federal spending in the 'Other Communications Equipment Manufacturing' category (NAICS 334290) trended historically, and how does this contract fit?

Historical federal spending in NAICS 334290, 'Other Communications Equipment Manufacturing,' can fluctuate based on technological advancements, national security needs, and agency modernization initiatives. Typically, this sector sees consistent investment as agencies require updated and reliable communication tools. This $3.19M contract represents a specific, time-bound investment within this broader category. Analyzing trends would involve looking at aggregate spending data for this NAICS code over several fiscal years to identify patterns of increase or decrease. This contract fits as a component of the government's ongoing expenditure to maintain and enhance its communication capabilities, ensuring operational readiness and technological relevance within this specialized manufacturing and support domain.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Communications Equipment Manufacturing › Other Communications Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Vectrus, Inc.

Address: 12612 CHALLENGER PKWY STE 300, ORLANDO, FL, 32826

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,189,519

Exercised Options: $3,189,519

Current Obligation: $3,189,519

Actual Outlays: $3,189,519

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 140D0424A0049

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline