Interior Department awards $4.4M CHEMAWA MATOC PROJECT to ROCK GAP ENGINEERING LLC for construction services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $4,418,802 ($4.4M)

Contractor: Rock GAP Engineering LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of the Interior

Start Date: 2022-09-16

End Date: 2026-07-31

Contract Duration: 1,414 days

Daily Burn Rate: $3.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: CHEMAWA MATOC PROJECT

Place of Performance

Location: SALEM, MARION County, OREGON, 97305

State: Oregon Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Interior obligated $4.4 million to ROCK GAP ENGINEERING LLC for work described as: CHEMAWA MATOC PROJECT Key points: 1. Contract value of $4.4M for construction services. 2. Awarded under full and open competition. 3. Contract duration of 1414 days. 4. Firm fixed price contract type. 5. Project located in Oregon. 6. No small business set-aside noted.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $4.4 million for the CHEMAWA MATOC PROJECT appears to be a reasonable amount for a construction project of this nature, given the duration of 1414 days. Benchmarking against similar commercial and institutional building construction projects within the Department of the Interior or other federal agencies would provide a clearer picture of value for money. Without specific details on the scope of work, it is difficult to definitively assess pricing against market rates or comparable contracts.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that while the competition was broad, there may have been specific exclusions applied. The presence of 4 bidders suggests a moderate level of competition. A higher number of bidders typically leads to more competitive pricing and a wider selection of qualified contractors, potentially benefiting taxpayers through cost savings.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition, despite potential exclusions, suggests that taxpayers likely received competitive pricing. However, the exact number of bidders (4) means there's a possibility that more robust competition could have yielded even better value.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely students and staff at the Chemawa Indian School, who will benefit from improved facilities. The contract delivers essential construction and renovation services for institutional buildings. The geographic impact is concentrated in Oregon, specifically where the Chemawa Indian School is located. The project will likely create or sustain jobs in the construction sector in the local Oregon area.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep in a long-duration construction project.
Ensuring adherence to firm fixed price terms throughout the project lifecycle.
Managing contractor performance over the 1414-day period.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a broad search for qualified contractors.
Firm fixed price contract type helps control costs and provides budget certainty.
The project is managed by the Department of the Interior, a major federal agency with established oversight processes.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a significant segment of the broader construction industry. Federal spending in this area supports infrastructure development and maintenance for government facilities. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other construction contracts awarded by the Department of the Interior or similar agencies for educational or institutional facilities.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). This means that large businesses were eligible to compete and potentially win. While this contract doesn't directly benefit small businesses through a set-aside, there may be subcontracting opportunities for small businesses, depending on the prime contractor's strategy and the nature of the work.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of the Interior's established procurement and project management protocols. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed price contract type, which incentivizes the contractor to complete the work within budget. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases, though specific project oversight details may not be publicly available.

Related Government Programs

Bureau of Indian Affairs Construction Projects
Bureau of Indian Education Facilities
Federal School Construction
Institutional Building Renovation

Risk Flags

Long project duration may increase risk of cost overruns or delays.
Potential for scope creep in construction projects.
Need to verify contractor's past performance on similar federal projects.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Interior awarded $4.4 million to ROCK GAP ENGINEERING LLC. CHEMAWA MATOC PROJECT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ROCK GAP ENGINEERING LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Interior (Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $4.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-09-16. End: 2026-07-31.

What is the specific scope of work for the CHEMAWA MATOC PROJECT, and how does it align with the needs of the Chemawa Indian School?

The provided data does not detail the specific scope of work for the CHEMAWA MATOC PROJECT. However, given the contract is for 'Commercial and Institutional Building Construction' and awarded to the Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education, it is highly probable that the project involves the construction, renovation, or repair of facilities at the Chemawa Indian School. This could include academic buildings, dormitories, administrative offices, or recreational facilities. A detailed scope of work would typically be outlined in the contract's statement of work, specifying deliverables, timelines, and quality standards. Understanding this scope is crucial for assessing the project's necessity and the contractor's ability to meet the educational and operational needs of the school.

How does the $4.4 million contract value compare to similar construction projects for educational institutions managed by the Department of the Interior?

Benchmarking the $4.4 million contract value against similar construction projects for educational institutions managed by the Department of the Interior requires access to historical contract data for comparable projects. Factors such as project size, complexity, location, and duration significantly influence cost. Without specific data on other projects of similar scope and scale, it's challenging to definitively state whether this contract represents excellent, good, or fair value. However, for a project spanning 1414 days (nearly four years), $4.4 million suggests a moderate-sized undertaking. A comprehensive analysis would involve comparing cost per square foot, cost per student capacity, or cost per major renovation component across multiple projects.

What are the potential risks associated with a firm fixed price contract for a construction project of this duration (1414 days)?

Firm fixed price (FFP) contracts are designed to provide cost certainty for the buyer. However, for a long-duration construction project like this (1414 days), there are inherent risks. The primary risk for the government is that the contractor may not be able to complete the project within the fixed price if unforeseen issues arise, such as material cost escalations, labor shortages, or unexpected site conditions. Conversely, the risk for the contractor is that if costs exceed the fixed price due to their own inefficiencies or poor planning, they will absorb the loss. Effective risk mitigation for the government involves a well-defined scope of work, thorough pre-award contractor vetting, and robust contract administration to monitor progress and address potential issues proactively.

What does the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' designation imply for the bidding process and potential cost savings?

The designation 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' indicates that the solicitation was made available to all responsible prospective contractors, but certain sources were excluded from consideration. This exclusion could be based on various factors, such as specific technical requirements, past performance issues, or national security concerns. While it aims for broad competition, the exclusion of certain sources might limit the pool of bidders. Ideally, a larger number of bidders leads to greater price competition and potential cost savings for taxpayers. With 4 bidders, the competition level is moderate, suggesting that while some price pressure existed, there might have been opportunities for even greater savings if more qualified bidders had participated.

What is the track record of ROCK GAP ENGINEERING LLC in performing federal construction contracts, particularly those of similar size and scope?

Information regarding the specific track record of ROCK GAP ENGINEERING LLC in performing federal construction contracts of similar size and scope is not detailed in the provided data. To assess their track record, one would need to examine their past performance on federal contracts, including project history, client satisfaction ratings, and any instances of contract disputes or terminations. Federal procurement databases and past performance reviews are typically used for this purpose. A positive track record with similar projects would increase confidence in their ability to successfully execute the CHEMAWA MATOC PROJECT within the specified timeline and budget.

How does the geographic location in Oregon influence the cost and execution of this construction project?

The geographic location in Oregon can influence the cost and execution of this construction project in several ways. Labor costs in Oregon may differ from national averages, potentially impacting the overall price. The availability of local construction materials and subcontractors can also affect project timelines and expenses. Furthermore, specific state and local building codes, environmental regulations, and permitting processes in Oregon must be adhered to, which can add complexity and time to the project. The remoteness or accessibility of the specific site within Oregon could also present logistical challenges and influence transportation costs for materials and equipment.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 140A2322R0060

Offers Received: 4

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6759 ACADEMY RD NE, ALBUQUERQUE, NM, 87109

Business Categories: American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $4,418,802

Exercised Options: $4,418,802

Current Obligation: $4,418,802

Actual Outlays: $3,966,434

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 140A1621D0035

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline