Interior Department awards $5M+ for SCIP PCB Cleanup, with 3 bidders competing for remediation services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $5,079,187 ($5.1M)

Contractor: Oneida Total Integrated Enterprises LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of the Interior

Start Date: 2021-09-20

End Date: 2026-12-31

Contract Duration: 1,928 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.6K/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: SCIP PCB CLEANUP PROJECT

Place of Performance

Location: COOLIDGE, PINAL County, ARIZONA, 85128

State: Arizona Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of the Interior obligated $5.1 million to ONEIDA TOTAL INTEGRATED ENTERPRISES LLC for work described as: SCIP PCB CLEANUP PROJECT Key points: 1. Value appears reasonable given the scope of environmental remediation services. 2. Competition was moderate, suggesting potential for price discovery but not maximum market pressure. 3. Risk indicators are low, with a firm-fixed-price contract and established remediation services. 4. Performance context is within environmental cleanup, a critical but often complex sector. 5. Sector positioning is in environmental services, a growing area driven by regulatory compliance.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of over $5 million for the SCIP PCB Cleanup Project seems aligned with typical environmental remediation projects of this scale. Benchmarking against similar large-scale hazardous material cleanup contracts would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure suggests that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, which is generally favorable for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was competed under the Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), indicating a full and open competition for procurements below a certain threshold. With three bidders participating, there was a reasonable level of competition, allowing for price comparison and selection of the most advantageous offer. The number of bidders suggests that the market for these specialized remediation services is accessible.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of this award, even under SAP, likely resulted in a fair market price for the taxpayer. Three bidders indicate that the government received multiple offers, preventing a single vendor from dictating terms and potentially driving down costs.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely the communities and ecosystems impacted by PCB contamination, with the project aiming to mitigate environmental hazards. The services delivered involve the complex and critical task of cleaning up polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), a persistent environmental pollutant. The geographic impact is focused on Arizona, specifically the area covered by the SCIP project. Workforce implications include the employment of skilled environmental technicians, engineers, and project managers for the duration of the cleanup.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The environmental remediation services sector is a significant part of the broader professional, scientific, and technical services industry. This contract falls within the hazardous waste management and site cleanup sub-sector, driven by federal and state environmental regulations. Spending in this area is often project-based and can fluctuate based on identified contamination sites and available funding. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found in contracts awarded by the EPA or DoD for similar cleanup operations.

Small Business Impact

Information regarding small business set-asides or subcontracting plans was not explicitly provided in the data. As the contract was competed under SAP and awarded to a single entity, further analysis would be needed to determine if small businesses were involved either as prime contractors or subcontractors. The absence of specific set-aside information suggests it may not have been a primary focus for this particular procurement.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education, agencies within the Department of the Interior. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm-fixed-price contract terms, requiring the contractor to complete the work to specified standards. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though detailed performance reporting may be internal.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

environmental-remediation, pcb-cleanup, department-of-the-interior, bureau-of-indian-affairs, purchase-order, firm-fixed-price, arizona, competed-under-sap, hazardous-waste, environmental-services, remediation-services

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of the Interior awarded $5.1 million to ONEIDA TOTAL INTEGRATED ENTERPRISES LLC. SCIP PCB CLEANUP PROJECT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ONEIDA TOTAL INTEGRATED ENTERPRISES LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of the Interior (Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $5.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2021-09-20. End: 2026-12-31.

What is the track record of ONEIDA TOTAL INTEGRATED ENTERPRISES LLC in handling PCB remediation projects?

A detailed review of ONEIDA TOTAL INTEGRATED ENTERPRISES LLC's past performance is crucial for assessing their capability to successfully execute the SCIP PCB Cleanup Project. This would involve examining their experience with similar environmental remediation projects, particularly those involving polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Key aspects to investigate include their history of meeting project deadlines, staying within budget (especially on fixed-price contracts), adherence to safety protocols, and any past performance issues or disputes. Information from sources like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or past performance questionnaires could provide insights into their reliability and expertise in managing complex environmental cleanup operations.

How does the awarded price compare to industry benchmarks for similar PCB cleanup projects?

To benchmark the value for money, the awarded contract price of approximately $5.08 million needs to be compared against industry standards for PCB remediation. This involves researching the typical costs associated with similar projects in terms of square footage treated, volume of material removed, complexity of the contamination, and geographic location. Factors such as the specific type of PCB contamination (e.g., soil, water, building materials) and the required cleanup methods (e.g., excavation, capping, in-situ treatment) significantly influence costs. Accessing data from environmental consulting firms, industry reports, or publicly available contract awards for comparable projects would allow for a more robust comparison and assessment of whether the government secured a competitive price.

What are the primary risks associated with this firm-fixed-price contract for PCB remediation?

Despite the risk mitigation inherent in a firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract, several risks persist for the SCIP PCB Cleanup Project. The most significant risk is the potential for unforeseen site conditions. Environmental remediation sites can harbor unexpected contaminants, geological challenges, or accessibility issues that were not fully identified during the initial assessment. If these conditions arise, the contractor, bearing the fixed price, might incur substantial cost overruns, potentially leading to requests for contract modifications or, in extreme cases, project delays or contractor default. Another risk is the long contract duration (nearly 5 years), which increases exposure to fluctuating material costs, labor availability, and regulatory changes. Ensuring the contractor has robust contingency planning and risk management protocols is vital.

How effective are the Bureau of Indian Affairs and Bureau of Indian Education in overseeing environmental remediation contracts?

The effectiveness of the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and Bureau of Indian Education (BIE) in overseeing this environmental remediation contract depends on their internal capacity, expertise, and established oversight mechanisms. These agencies are responsible for managing resources on tribal lands, which often include environmental stewardship. Their oversight would typically involve monitoring contractor progress against the Statement of Work, ensuring compliance with environmental regulations and safety standards, reviewing deliverables, and managing payments. The presence of a firm-fixed-price contract shifts some risk to the contractor, but government oversight remains critical for verifying that the remediation meets all technical and environmental requirements. Assessing their past performance on similar contracts and the adequacy of their contracting officer representatives (CORs) would provide a clearer picture of their oversight effectiveness.

What is the historical spending trend for PCB cleanup projects managed by the Department of the Interior?

Analyzing historical spending trends for PCB cleanup projects within the Department of the Interior (DOI) is essential for understanding patterns, identifying potential budget fluctuations, and contextualizing the current $5.08 million award. This would involve examining past contract awards for similar environmental remediation services, specifically those addressing PCB contamination, across various DOI bureaus (like the Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, etc.). Key data points to look for include the number of such contracts awarded annually, the average contract value, the duration of these projects, and the total annual expenditure on PCB remediation. Understanding these trends can reveal whether spending is increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable, and whether the current award represents a significant deviation from historical norms, potentially indicating a new large-scale effort or a shift in priorities.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesRemediation and Other Waste Management ServicesRemediation Services

Product/Service Code: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENTENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS PROTECTION

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Solicitation ID: 140A1121Q0039

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1033 N MAYFAIR RD, MILWAUKEE, WI, 53226

Business Categories: American Indian Owned Business, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $5,079,187

Exercised Options: $5,079,187

Current Obligation: $5,079,187

Actual Outlays: $717,877

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline

Start Date: 2021-09-20

Current End Date: 2026-12-31

Potential End Date: 2026-12-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-03-23

More Contracts from Oneida Total Integrated Enterprises LLC

View all Oneida Total Integrated Enterprises LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of the Interior Contracts

View all Department of the Interior contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending