NOAA Awards $516M Contract to Aerospace Corp for Systems Architecture and Engineering Support

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $5,163,064 ($5.2M)

Contractor: THE Aerospace Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Commerce

Start Date: 2025-05-08

End Date: 2027-05-07

Contract Duration: 729 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.1K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: R&D

Official Description: SSES TO SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING (SAE)(TO 11)

Place of Performance

Location: SILVER SPRING, MONTGOMERY County, MARYLAND, 20910

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Commerce obligated $5.2 million to THE AEROSPACE CORPORATION for work described as: SSES TO SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING (SAE)(TO 11) Key points: 1. Significant award to a single contractor for R&D services. 2. Sole-source nature raises questions about competition and potential cost efficiencies. 3. Long-term contract (729 days) suggests critical, ongoing needs. 4. Focus on systems architecture and engineering points to complex technical requirements.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $516M for 729 days is substantial. Without comparable sole-source contracts for similar R&D services, it's difficult to assess if this pricing is competitive. The Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure requires careful monitoring to ensure costs remain reasonable.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This limits price discovery and may prevent the government from obtaining the best possible price through competitive bidding. The justification for sole-source is critical for understanding the necessity.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition could lead to higher costs for taxpayers compared to a fully competed contract. Effective oversight is needed to mitigate potential overspending.

Public Impact

Impacts NOAA's ability to advance critical research and development in physical, engineering, and life sciences. Ensures continuity of essential systems architecture and engineering expertise. Potential for innovation and technological advancement within the agency. Raises concerns about taxpayer value due to the sole-source nature.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 70 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences sector. Federal spending in this area is crucial for innovation but requires careful management to ensure value. Benchmarks for similar sole-source R&D contracts are often difficult to establish.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to small businesses (ss=false, sb=false). This suggests the scope or nature of the work requires specialized capabilities typically held by larger, established firms.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this award necessitates robust oversight from the Department of Commerce and NOAA to ensure the contractor is performing effectively and that costs are reasonable and allocable. Transparency in the justification for sole-source is paramount.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

research-and-development-in-the-physical, department-of-commerce, md, delivery-order, 1m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Commerce awarded $5.2 million to THE AEROSPACE CORPORATION. SSES TO SYSTEMS ARCHITECTURE AND ENGINEERING (SAE)(TO 11)

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE AEROSPACE CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Commerce (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $5.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-05-08. End: 2027-05-07.

What is the specific justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and what steps are being taken to ensure fair pricing?

The justification for a sole-source award typically relates to unique capabilities, proprietary technology, or urgent needs where only one source can fulfill the requirement. To ensure fair pricing, the government should conduct thorough cost analyses, benchmark against similar (if available) sole-source contracts, and implement stringent monitoring of the Cost Plus Fixed Fee elements throughout the contract's life.

How will NOAA ensure the long-term effectiveness and value of this systems architecture and engineering support, given the lack of competitive pressure?

NOAA can ensure effectiveness and value through strong contract management, including detailed performance metrics, regular progress reviews, and clear deliverables. Establishing independent cost estimates and actively managing the fixed fee component will be crucial. Furthermore, periodic market research should be conducted to assess if competition might be feasible for future contract actions.

What is the potential impact on future R&D capabilities if similar contracts continue to be awarded sole-source without exploring competitive alternatives?

A continued pattern of sole-source awards in critical R&D areas could stifle innovation by limiting the pool of contractors and potentially leading to complacency among incumbent providers. It may also result in higher long-term costs for the government and taxpayers, as competitive pressures that drive efficiency and cost-effectiveness are absent.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesScientific Research and Development ServicesResearch and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences (except Nanotechnology and Biotechnology)

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: 1332KP25R0011

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2310 E EL SEGUNDO BLVD, EL SEGUNDO, CA, 90245

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Tax Exempt, Nonprofit Organization, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $5,163,064

Exercised Options: $5,163,064

Current Obligation: $5,163,064

Actual Outlays: $1,371,432

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 1332KP22DNEEG0002

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2025-05-08

Current End Date: 2027-05-07

Potential End Date: 2027-05-07 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-03-27

More Contracts from THE Aerospace Corporation

View all THE Aerospace Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Commerce Contracts

View all Department of Commerce contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending