NOAA awards $2.2M for ship repairs to G I Industrial-Marine, LLC under full and open competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,213,768 ($2.2M)

Contractor: G I Industrial-Marine, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Commerce

Start Date: 2025-09-11

End Date: 2026-02-05

Contract Duration: 147 days

Daily Burn Rate: $15.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: FY26 DS REPAIRS FOR NOAA SHIP THOMAS JEFFERSON. OMAO-EXMPT-125

Place of Performance

Location: NORFOLK, NORFOLK County, MASSACHUSETTS, 02056

State: Massachusetts Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Commerce obligated $2.2 million to G I INDUSTRIAL-MARINE, LLC for work described as: FY26 DS REPAIRS FOR NOAA SHIP THOMAS JEFFERSON. OMAO-EXMPT-125 Key points: 1. Contract awarded for essential repairs to NOAA Ship Thomas Jefferson, ensuring operational readiness. 2. The contract was competed under a full and open process, suggesting a competitive bidding environment. 3. The fixed-price contract type aims to control costs and provide predictability for the government. 4. The duration of the repair work is approximately 147 days. 5. This award represents a specific investment in NOAA's fleet maintenance and operational capabilities.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The awarded amount of $2.21 million for ship repairs appears reasonable given the scope of work for a vessel like the NOAA Ship Thomas Jefferson. Benchmarking against similar vessel repair contracts would provide a more precise value assessment. The firm fixed-price structure suggests a commitment to cost control by the government, shifting some risk to the contractor.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' mechanism, indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. The presence of 6 bids suggests a healthy level of competition for this specific repair work. A competitive process generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive bidding process for this repair contract is beneficial for taxpayers as it likely resulted in a more cost-effective outcome compared to a sole-source award.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiary is NOAA, ensuring the operational capability of the NOAA Ship Thomas Jefferson for its scientific and survey missions. Services delivered include essential repairs to maintain the vessel's structural integrity and operational systems. The geographic impact is primarily related to the vessel's operational area, which supports oceanic research and charting. Workforce implications include employment for skilled trades involved in ship repair and maintenance.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if unforeseen issues arise during repairs, impacting final cost.
Dependence on contractor's ability to meet quality standards and timelines for critical repairs.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, indicating a robust bidding process.
Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
Contractor has a track record, though specific performance details require further investigation.

Sector Analysis

The ship building and repairing sector is critical for maintaining national maritime assets. This contract falls within the broader industrial marine services market, which supports government fleets. Spending in this sector is often driven by maintenance cycles, modernization efforts, and the need for operational readiness of vessels across various agencies.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses, and the contractor, G I INDUSTRIAL-MARINE, LLC, is not explicitly identified as a small business in the provided snippet. Further investigation into subcontracting opportunities would be needed to assess the impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) contracting officers and program managers. The firm fixed-price nature provides some cost control. Transparency is facilitated by the contract award notice, but detailed performance monitoring and inspector general involvement would depend on specific agency protocols and any identified issues.

Related Government Programs

NOAA Fleet Operations
Ship Maintenance and Repair Contracts
Federal Maritime Services
Government Vessel Procurement

Risk Flags

Potential for unforeseen repair issues impacting cost and schedule.
Contractor performance risk requires ongoing monitoring.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Commerce awarded $2.2 million to G I INDUSTRIAL-MARINE, LLC. FY26 DS REPAIRS FOR NOAA SHIP THOMAS JEFFERSON. OMAO-EXMPT-125

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is G I INDUSTRIAL-MARINE, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Commerce (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-09-11. End: 2026-02-05.

What is the track record of G I INDUSTRIAL-MARINE, LLC in performing similar ship repair contracts for federal agencies?

A thorough review of G I INDUSTRIAL-MARINE, LLC's past performance is crucial. This would involve examining previous federal contracts, including their value, scope, and timeliness of completion. Performance evaluations, such as Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) data, would provide insights into their reliability, quality of work, and adherence to contract terms. Understanding their experience with vessels of similar size and complexity to the NOAA Ship Thomas Jefferson is particularly important. Any history of disputes, contract modifications, or performance issues would be significant risk indicators.

How does the awarded price of $2.21 million compare to similar ship repair contracts for NOAA vessels?

To benchmark the value, we would compare this $2.21 million award against historical contracts for repairs on NOAA vessels of comparable size, age, and type. This analysis would consider the specific scope of work, such as hull repairs, engine overhauls, or system upgrades. Factors like the duration of the contract and the firm fixed-price nature also influence cost. If similar repairs on comparable vessels have cost significantly more or less, it could indicate either exceptional value or potential overpricing/underbidding for this contract. Access to detailed repair specifications and market rates for labor and materials would enhance this comparison.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Key risks include potential cost overruns if unforeseen issues arise during repairs (mitigated by the firm fixed-price structure, which shifts some risk to the contractor), schedule delays impacting NOAA's operational plans (mitigated by contract clauses for timely completion and potential penalties), and quality control issues (mitigated by government inspection and acceptance processes). The contractor's past performance and financial stability are also risk factors that should have been assessed during the procurement. The competitive nature of the award may also reduce risks associated with contractor performance, as multiple bidders were evaluated.

How effective is the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' method in ensuring fair pricing for this type of specialized repair?

The 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' method is designed to maximize competition while allowing for specific exclusions if justified. In this case, with 6 bids received, it suggests that the exclusion criteria did not unduly limit the pool of qualified bidders. This level of competition generally promotes fair pricing by allowing market forces to determine a reasonable cost. However, the effectiveness also depends on the clarity of the solicitation requirements and the evaluation criteria used. If the exclusion criteria were narrowly defined, it could potentially limit competition, but the number of bids received here indicates a reasonably broad engagement.

What is the historical spending trend for ship repair and maintenance within NOAA over the last five fiscal years?

Analyzing NOAA's historical spending on ship repair and maintenance over the past five fiscal years would reveal trends in investment in its fleet. This data could show whether spending has been increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable, and whether it aligns with the age and operational needs of the fleet. Understanding these patterns can help contextualize the current $2.21 million award, indicating if it represents a typical expenditure or a significant deviation. It also helps assess NOAA's overall commitment to fleet readiness and the adequacy of its maintenance budgets.

What specific systems or components of the NOAA Ship Thomas Jefferson are slated for repair under this contract?

The provided data does not detail the specific systems or components of the NOAA Ship Thomas Jefferson that require repair. This information would typically be found in the detailed statement of work (SOW) or specifications attached to the contract award. Understanding the scope of repairs—whether they involve hull integrity, propulsion systems, navigation equipment, scientific instrumentation, or habitability features—is crucial for assessing the contract's value, risks, and impact on the vessel's operational capabilities. Without this detail, the assessment remains at a high level.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Ship and Boat Building › Ship Building and Repairing

Product/Service Code: SHIPS, SMALL CRAFT, PONTOON, DOCKS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 1305M225R0034

Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2100 COLUMBIA ST, PORTSMOUTH, VA, 23704

Business Categories: Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, HUBZone Firm, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,213,768

Exercised Options: $2,213,768

Current Obligation: $2,213,768

Actual Outlays: $2,174,642

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 1305M223DNMAN0039

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline