Commerce Department awards $5.56M environmental consulting contract to LYNKER CORPORATION for NOAA

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $5,566,241 ($5.6M)

Contractor: Lynker Corporation

Awarding Agency: Department of Commerce

Start Date: 2023-09-27

End Date: 2026-09-26

Contract Duration: 1,095 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: NOS/OCS: PROVIDE CONSULTING AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES.

Place of Performance

Location: SILVER SPRING, MONTGOMERY County, MARYLAND, 20910

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Commerce obligated $5.6 million to LYNKER CORPORATION for work described as: NOS/OCS: PROVIDE CONSULTING AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES. Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract duration of 1095 days (3 years) provides a stable period for service delivery. 3. Firm Fixed Price contract type helps manage cost certainty for the government. 4. The award is a single delivery order, indicating a specific task or project. 5. The contractor, LYNKER CORPORATION, is based in Maryland, potentially impacting local economic benefits. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541620 points to environmental consulting services.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $5.56 million over three years averages to approximately $1.85 million annually. Benchmarking this against similar environmental consulting contracts requires access to a broader dataset of government procurements. However, the firm fixed-price structure suggests that the government has negotiated a set price, which can be advantageous if the scope of work is well-defined. Without specific performance metrics or detailed cost breakdowns, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging, but the competitive award process is a positive indicator.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The data indicates one award, but the initial solicitation likely attracted multiple proposals. A competitive process generally leads to better price discovery and a wider range of technical solutions. The specific number of bids received is not provided, which would offer further insight into the intensity of the competition.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is the most taxpayer-friendly approach, as it maximizes the chances of obtaining the best value through a robust bidding process and encourages competitive pricing.

Public Impact

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) will benefit from specialized environmental consulting and management services. These services are crucial for supporting NOAA's mission, likely related to environmental monitoring, research, or regulatory compliance. The contract's geographic impact is centered in Maryland, where the contractor is located, potentially creating local employment and economic activity. The delivery of these services supports the broader federal government's environmental stewardship and scientific endeavors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Positive Signals

Sector Analysis

The environmental consulting services sector is a significant part of the professional services industry, supporting government agencies in areas such as environmental impact assessments, compliance, and sustainability initiatives. Federal spending in this sector is driven by regulatory requirements and the need for specialized expertise. This contract, valued at $5.56 million over three years, represents a modest investment within the broader federal environmental consulting landscape. Comparable contracts often range from hundreds of thousands to tens of millions of dollars, depending on the scope and duration.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary contractor, LYNKER CORPORATION, is likely a larger entity or a small business that won through a full and open competition. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. Without specific subcontracting goals or reporting, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem from this particular award is unclear, though larger prime contractors often utilize small businesses for specialized tasks.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Commerce and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). As a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle (implied by 'AW': 'DELIVERY ORDER'), oversight may also be influenced by the terms of the base contract. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of financial oversight by fixing the total cost. Transparency is generally facilitated through federal procurement databases like SAM.gov, where contract awards are published. Specific Inspector General jurisdiction would depend on the agency's internal structure and any potential fraud, waste, or abuse identified.

Related Government Programs

Risk Flags

Tags

environmental-consulting, department-of-commerce, noaa, maryland, delivery-order, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, professional-services, consulting-and-management-services

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Commerce awarded $5.6 million to LYNKER CORPORATION. NOS/OCS: PROVIDE CONSULTING AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is LYNKER CORPORATION.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Commerce (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $5.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-09-27. End: 2026-09-26.

What is LYNKER CORPORATION's track record with federal contracts, particularly with NOAA or the Department of Commerce?

Assessing LYNKER CORPORATION's track record requires a review of their past federal contract awards. Information available through federal procurement databases (e.g., SAM.gov, FPDS) would detail previous contracts, their values, agencies involved, and performance history. A history of successful contract completions, positive performance reviews, and compliance with federal regulations would indicate a reliable contractor. Conversely, a history of contract disputes, performance failures, or compliance issues would raise concerns. For this specific contract, understanding their experience with environmental consulting services and NOAA's specific mission needs would be crucial for evaluating their capability.

How does the $5.56 million contract value compare to similar environmental consulting services procured by NOAA or other federal agencies?

The $5.56 million contract value over three years, averaging approximately $1.85 million annually, places this contract in the mid-range for federal environmental consulting services. Smaller, task-specific contracts can be in the tens or hundreds of thousands, while large, multi-year, comprehensive service contracts can exceed tens or even hundreds of millions. NOAA and agencies like the EPA, DOI, or DOD frequently procure similar services. A detailed comparison would involve analyzing the scope of work, duration, and specific services rendered in comparable contracts. Without that granular data, it's difficult to definitively benchmark this award, but it appears to be a standard-sized award for specialized consulting.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or deliverables expected under this contract, and how will their achievement be measured?

The specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and deliverables for this contract are not detailed in the provided summary. Typically, for environmental consulting services, KPIs might include the timely submission of environmental impact assessments, adherence to regulatory compliance standards, accuracy of data analysis, effectiveness of recommended solutions, and client satisfaction. Measurement would likely involve regular progress reports, review meetings between NOAA and LYNKER CORPORATION, acceptance of deliverables, and potentially post-project reviews. The contract document itself would outline these specific metrics and the methodology for assessing performance against them.

What is the historical spending pattern for environmental consulting services by NOAA over the past five years?

Analyzing NOAA's historical spending on environmental consulting services over the past five years would reveal trends in procurement volume, types of services sought, and primary contractors. This data, accessible through federal spending databases, would show whether spending has increased, decreased, or remained stable. It would also highlight any shifts in focus, such as increased demand for climate change adaptation services or renewable energy consulting. Understanding this historical context helps in evaluating whether the current $5.56 million award is consistent with past investment levels or represents a significant change in NOAA's approach to acquiring these services.

Are there any identified risks associated with LYNKER CORPORATION's performance or the nature of the environmental consulting services required?

Potential risks associated with this contract include performance-related issues, such as delays in deliverables, quality concerns, or failure to meet specific environmental standards. The complexity of environmental regulations and the potential for unforeseen environmental challenges can also pose risks. Furthermore, reliance on a single contractor for critical services introduces a dependency risk. Mitigation strategies would involve robust contract management, clear performance expectations, regular monitoring, and contingency planning. The firm fixed-price nature helps mitigate financial risk for the government, but performance risk remains a key area for oversight.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical ServicesManagement, Scientific, and Technical Consulting ServicesEnvironmental Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT)PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 1305M223QNCNJ0155

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5485 CONESTOGA CT STE 220, BOULDER, CO, 80301

Business Categories: Category Business, HUBZone Firm, Limited Liability Corporation, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $7,303,209

Exercised Options: $5,566,241

Current Obligation: $5,566,241

Actual Outlays: $4,303,260

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 1305M419DNCNA0018

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2023-09-27

Current End Date: 2026-09-26

Potential End Date: 2027-09-26 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-02-18

More Contracts from Lynker Corporation

View all Lynker Corporation federal contracts →

Other Department of Commerce Contracts

View all Department of Commerce contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending